Theory of defect complexes

  • Sokrates T. Pantelides
Part II. Theory
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 175)

Abstract

Most methods that are used to describe point defects become cumbersome and impractical for defect complexes. Here, we review these methods and describe a simple alternative, which can provide both qualitative and semiempirical quantitative descriptions of the localized states associated with defect complexes. It is similar in spirit with the “defect-molecule” model which has sometimes been used for qualitative work, but is defined in a way that allows quantitative calculations. The method is particularly powerful for classes of complexes such as aggregates of identical point defects when the electronic structure of the primary point defect is known and for defects in wide-gap materials. lie review results obtained for multivacancies in Si and for several defects in SiO2.

Keywords

Matrix Element Point Defect Defect Complex Dangling Bond Basis Orbital 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    For a review and critique of cluster methods, see S.T. Pantelides, Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, 797 (1978)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.G. Louie, M. Schlüter, J.R. Chelikowsky and M.L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 13, 1654 (1976)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    See, e.g., T.L. Reinecke and P.J. Lin-Chung, Solid State Comm. 42, 623 (1981)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Jaros, Adv. in Phys.59 (1980), and references thereinGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Bernholc, N.O. Lipari and S.T. Pantelides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 895 (1978); Phys. Rev. B 21, 3545 (1980)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G.A. Baraff and M. Schlütér, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 892 (1978); Phys. Rev. B 19, 4965 (1979)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    U. Lindefelt and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 24, 5913 (1981)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Scheffler, S.T. Pantelides, N.O. Lipari and J. Bernholc, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 413 (1981); Phys. Rev. B, to be publishedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Bernholc, N.O. Lipari, S.T. Pantelides and M. Scheffler, Phys. Rev. 26, Nov. 15 (1982)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G.O. Baraff, E.O. Kane and M. Schlüter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 601 (1981); G.B. Bachelet, G.A. Baraff and M. Schlüter, Phys. Rev. B 24, 915 (1981)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Bernholc and S.T. Pantelides, Phys. Rev. 18, 1780 (1978)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. Ivanov and S.T. Pantelides, to be published; S.T. Pantelides, I. Ivanov, M. Scheffler and J.P. Vigneron, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Defects in Semiconductors, Amsterdam, 1982 (in press)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    See, e.g., the review article by J.W. Corbett and J.C. Bourgoin, in Point Defects in Solids, edited by J.H. Crawford, Jr. and L.M. Slifkin (Plenum, New York, 1975)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    E.G., R.P. Messmer and G.D. Watkins, Phys. Rev. B 7, 1568 (1973)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    S.T. Pantelides, Thin Sol. Films 89, 103 (1982)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    For example, the gap-region localized states of the single vacancy in Si calculated by L.A. Hemstreet (Phys.Rev.B 15, 834 (1977)) are in good agreement with the results of Green's-function calculations.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    See, e.g., S.T. Pantelides and J. Pollmann, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 16, 1354 (1979)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S.T. Pantelides and W.A. Harrison, Phys. Rev. B 13, 2667 (1976)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sokrates T. Pantelides
    • 1
  1. 1.IBM Thomas J. Watson Research CenterYorktown HeightsUSA

Personalised recommendations