Advertisement

Fuzzy pattern classification of hemodynamic data can be used to determine noninvasive intracranial pressure

  • B. SchmidtEmail author
  • S. F. Bocklisch
  • M. Päßler
  • M. Czosnyka
  • J. J. Schwarze
  • J. Klingelhöfer
Part of the Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum book series (NEUROCHIRURGICA, volume 95)

Summary

Objective

The authors previously introduced a method in which intracranial pressure (ICP) was estimated using parameters (TCD characteristics) derived from cerebral blood flow velocity (FV) and arterial blood pressure (ABP). Some results suggested that this model might be influenced by the patient’s state of cerebral autoregulation and other clinical parameters. Hence, it was the aim of the present study to improve the method by modifying the previously used global procedure in certain subgroups of patients.

Methods

In 103 traumatic brain injured patients (3–76 years, mean: 31 ±16 years) signal data of FV, ABP and ICP were used to generate samples of TCD characteristics together with time corresponding ICP. Fuzzy Pattern Classification was used to identify cluster subsets (classes) of the sample space. On each class a local estimator of ICP was defined. This approach provides a non-invasive assessment of ICP (nICP) as follows: Using FV and ABP the TCD characteristics were computed and related to the matching classes. nICP was calculated as a weighted sum of local ICP estimations.

Results

ICP A and B waves and long-term trends could be visibly assessed. The median absolute difference between ICP and nICP was 5.7 mmHg.

Conclusions

The class structure of the model facilitates nICP assessment in heterogeneous patient groups and supports a stepwise extension of the target patient group without affecting the former validity.

Keywords

Intracranial pressure cerebral autoregulation cerebral blood flow transcranial Doppler ultrasonography fuzzy pattern classification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aaslid R, Lundar T, Lindegaard KF, Nornes H (1993) Estimation of cerebral perfusion pressure from arterial blood pressure and transcranial Doppler recordings. In: Miller JD, Teasdale GM, Rowan JO, Galbraith SL, Mendelow AD (eds) Intracranial pressure VI. Springer, Berlin, pp 226–229Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baur M, Bocklisch SF (2001) Similarity based local model approach for nonlinear modelling. In: Proc 6th European Control Conference. ECC01, Porto, Portugal, pp 3905–3910Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bocklisch SF, Päßler M (2000) Fuzzy time series analysis. In: Hampel et al (eds) Fuzzy control — theory and practice. Physica-Verlag, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chan KH, Miller JD, Dearden NM, Andrews PJ, Midgley S (1992) The effect of changes in cerebral perfusion pressure upon middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity and jugular bulb venous oxygen saturation after severe brain injury. J Neurosurg 77: 117–130Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Menon DK, Pickard JD (1996) Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation in head-injured patients. Stroke 27: 1829–1834PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Czosnyka M, Matta BF, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Pickard JD (1998) Cerebral perfusion pressure in head-injured patients: a noninvasive assessment using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. J Neurosurg 88(5): 802–808PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klingelhöfer J, Conrad B, Benecke R, Sander D (1987) Relationship between intracranial pressure and intracranial flow patterns in patients suffering from cerebral diseases. J Cardiovasc Ultrasonogr 6: 249–254Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klingelhöfer J, Conrad B, Benecke R, Sander D, Markakis E (1988) Evaluation of intracranial pressure from transcranial Doppler studies in cerebral disease. J Neurol 235: 159–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lundberg N (1960) Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice. Acta Psych Neurol Scand [Suppl] 149: 1–193Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Newell DW, Aaslid R, Stooss R, Reulen HJ (1992) The relationship of blood flow velocity fluctuations to intracranial pressure B waves. J Neurosurg 76: 415–421PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schmidt B, Klingelhöfer J, Schwarze JJ, Sander D, Wittich I (1997) Noninvasive prediction of intracranial pressure curves using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography and blood pressure curves. Stroke 28: 2465–2472PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmidt B, Schwarze JJ, Czosnyka M, Sander D, Wittich I, Klingelhöfer J (1998) A method for a simulation of continuous intracranial pressure curves. Comp Biomed Res 31(4): 231–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schmidt B, Czosnyka M, Schwarze JJ, Sander D, Gerstner W, Lumenta CB, Pickard JD, Klingelhöfer J (1999) Cerebral vasodilatation causing acute intracranial hypertension — a method for non-invasive assessment. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 19: 990–996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schmidt B, Czosnyka M, Schwarze JJ, Sander D, Gerstner W, Lumenta CB, Klingelhöfer J (2000) Evaluation of a method for noninvasive intracranial pressure assessment during infusion studies in patients with hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 92: 793–800PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schmidt B, Czosnyka M, Raabe A, Yahya H, Schwarze JJ, Sackerer D, Sander D, Klingelhöfer J (2003) Adaptive noninvasive assessment of cerebral autoregulation and ICP. Stroke 34: 84–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zabolotny W, Czosnyka M, Smielewski P (1994) Portable software for intracranial pressure recording and waveform analysis. In: Nagai H, Kamiya K, Ishii S (eds) Intracranial Pressure IX. Springer, Berlin, pp 439–440Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Schmidt
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. F. Bocklisch
    • 2
  • M. Päßler
    • 2
  • M. Czosnyka
    • 3
  • J. J. Schwarze
    • 1
  • J. Klingelhöfer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyMedical Centre ChemnitzChemnitzGermany
  2. 2.Department of Systems TheoryTechnical University ChemnitzChemnitzGermany
  3. 3.Academic Neurosurgical UnitAddenbrooke’s HospitalCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations