Endoscopic carpal tunnel release surgery: retrospective study of 390 consecutive cases
Endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) surgery was developed by Okutsu and Chow in 1989. Many reports indicated that the endoscopic technique reduces postoperative morbidity with minimal incision, minimal pain and scarring, a shortened recovery period and high level of patient satisfaction. To evaluate these reports, a retrospective study was conducted with 390 procedures of two-portal Chow technique for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Follow-up was performed at 1, 3 and 6 months and overall results were backed up by telephone questionnaire (Health Outcomes Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, Health Outcomes, Bloomington, MN, USA). Results were favourable in 98% and 2% unfavorable for persistent pain. Rate of satisfaction of the patients was 90%. Average time of patient’s return to work was 20 days. Eleven procedures (2.8%) were converted to open release. There was one case (0.2%) of incompleted section of the perineurium due to failure of endoscopic visualization of the ligament. In this case the procedure was converted to open and was completed with perineurium sutura. In six cases (1.5%) there were injury to superficial palmar arch. During the follow-up period there were no recurrences and no re-exploration. The mean preoperatively obtainable distal motor latency (DML) and sensory conduction velocity (SCV) values were 6.7 m/s and 29.2 m/s, respectively. The mean DML and SVC values at final follow-up were 3.8 msec and 42.3 m/s, respectively. In conclusion, ECTR can be used in the carpal tunnel syndrome and is a reliable alternative to the open procedure with excellent self-report of patient satisfaction. Reduced recovery period with minimal tissue violation and incisional pain can be expected.
KeywordsCarpal tunnel syndrome endoscopic release electromyographic evaluation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Agee JM, McCaroll HR Jr, Tortosa RD, Berry DA, Szabo RM, Peimer CA (1992) Endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel: a randomized prospective multicenter study. J Hand Surg 17A: 987–995Google Scholar
- 4.Atroshi I, Johnson R, Ornstein E (1998) Patient satisfaction and return to work after endoscopic carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg 23: 58–65Google Scholar
- 6.Brief R, Brief LP (2000) Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: report of 146 cases. Mount Sinai J Med 67: 274–277Google Scholar
- 7.Bromely GS (1994) Minimal-incision open carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg 19A: 119–120Google Scholar
- 8.Brown RA, Gelberman RH, Seiler JG III, Abrahamsson S-O, Weiland AJ, Urbaniak JR, Schoenfeld DA (1993) Carpal tunnel release: a prospective, randomized assessment of open and endoscopic methods. J Bone Joint Surg 75A: 1265–1275Google Scholar
- 9.Brown MG, Rothenberg ES, Reyser B, Woloszyn TT, Wolford A (1993) Results of l,236 endoscopic carpal tunnel release procedures using the Brown technique. Ctemp Orthop 27: 251–262Google Scholar
- 10.Chang MH (2002) Usefulness of sensory and motor conduction testing in carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurology 58: 1597–1607 (abstr)Google Scholar
- 21.Okutsu I, Ninomiya S, Natsuyama M et al (1987) Subcutaneous operation and examination under universal endoscope. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 61: 491–498Google Scholar
- 27.Thurston A, Lam N (1997) Results of open carpal tunnel release: A comprehensive, retrospective study of 188 hands. Aust NZ J Surg 67: 282–288Google Scholar