Improvement of the Arctic Ocean Bathymetry and Regional Tide Atlas: First Result on Evaluating Existing Arctic Ocean Bathymetric Models
- 22 Downloads
The quality of existing bathymetry models for the Arctic Ocean is evaluated through visual comparison and the response of modelled tides. The high resolution ArcTide 2017 hydrodynamic model was used to evaluate the bathymetry in selected shallow water regions where tides are significant. The Southern Barents Sea was identified as a problematic region where inconsistencies were identified, resulting from methods used to patch in regional models and incorrect definitions of coastlines and depths. More generally, the investigation shows that careful verifications are needed to ensure seamless transitions between bathymetry datasets.
More accurate bathymetry in the Arctic Ocean is needed and we outline the development of a new Arctic bathymetry using bathymetry inversion which uses a combination of the existing Arctic bathymetry and topography inverted from a band-pass filtered version of the most recent DTU17 gravity field. We also illustrate the regions where we find adequate spatial correlation to perform such inversion.
KeywordsArctic Ocean, Bathymetry, Ocean tide, Satellite altimetry
The authors would like to acknowledge the ESA contribution to the research, through the Cryosat Plus for Oceans program supported under the ESA Support to Science Element Programme (contract 4000106169/12/I-NB).
- Becker JJ, Sandwell DT, Smith WHF, Braud J, Binder B, Depner J, Fabre D, Factor J, Ingalls S, Kim S-H, Ladner R, Marks K, Nelson S, Pharaoh A, Trimmer R, Rosenberg JV, Wallace G, Weatherall P (2009) Global bathymetry and elevation data at 30 arc seconds resolution: SRTM30_PLUS. Mar Geod 32:355–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490410903297766 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carrère L, Lyard F, Cancet M, Guillot A, Roblou L (2012) FES2012: a new global tidal model taking advantage of nearly twenty years of altimetry. In: Proceeding of the 20 years of progress in radar altimetry symposium, Venice, ItalyGoogle Scholar
- Carrère L, Lyard F, Cancet M, Guillot A, Picot N, Dupuy S (2015) FES2014: A new global tidal model. Presented at the Ocean Surface Topography Science Team meeting, Reston, USAGoogle Scholar
- Jakobsson M, Mayer L, Coakley B, Dowdeswell JA, Forbes S, Fridman B, Hodnesdal H, Noormets R, Pedersen R, Rebesco M, Schenke HW, Yarayskaya Z, Accettella D, Armstrong A, Anderson RM, Bienhoff P, Camerlenghi A, Church I, Edwards M, Gardner JV, Hall JK, Hell B, Hestvik O, Kristoffersen Y, Marcussen C, Mohammed R, Mosher D, Nghiem SV, Pedrosa MT, Travaglini PG, Weatherall P (2012) The International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean (IBCAO) version 3.0. Geophys Res Lett 39:L12609. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Laske G, Masters G (1997) A global digital map of sediment thickness. EOS Trans AGU 78:F483Google Scholar
- Sandwell DT, Gille ST, Smith WHF (2002) Bathymetry from space: oceanography, geophysics, and climate, Bethesda, MD, USA, pp 1–24Google Scholar
- Timmermann R, Le Brocq A, Deen T, Domack E, Dutrieux P, Galton-Fenzi B, Hellmer H, Humbert A, Jansen D, Jenkins A, Lambrecht A, Makinson K, Niederjasper F, Nitsche F, Nøst OA, Smedsrud LH, Smith WHF (2010) A consistent data set of Antarctic ice sheet topography, cavity geometry, and global bathymetry. Earth Syst Sci Data 2:261–273. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2-261-2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar