History of Monitoring Earth Orientation, and Re-analyses of Old Data

Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 147)

Abstract

The history of monitoring Earth orientation goes back to the end of nineteenth century, when polar motion was discovered. Description of international efforts in organizing coordinated observations to determine Earth’s orientation is presented. The services, such as International Latitude Service (ILS), Bureau International de l’Heure (BIH), International Polar Motion Service (IPMS) and, finally, International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS), are described, as well as the observational techniques used by them. Each improvement of the techniques and their accuracies led to new discoveries and corresponding improvements of the theory of Earth’s rotation. From the very beginning of these efforts, classical astrometric observations were used for almost one century. Later on, as more precise modern data obtained by space geodesy appeared, new and more accurate theories of precession-nutation became necessary. Finally, to explain the differences between the observations and theory, more and more data from other sources (mainly of geophysical origin) became necessary to be considered. These data and their effects are also shortly commented. Here we concentrate on optical astrometry that dominated throughout the twentieth century; namely we present some important re-analyses of these observations. Special attention is devoted to the re-analyses done in 1998–2012 at the Astronomical Institute, Czech Academy of Sciences. Data covering 1899.7–1992.0 were used to derive Earth orientation parameters and to improve star positions and proper motions in the Hipparcos celestial reference frame.

Keywords

History Optical astrometry Rotation of the Earth Space geodesy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the project RVO: 67985815.

References

  1. Capitaine N, Wallace PT, Chapront J (2003) Expressions for IAU 2000 precession quantities. Astron Astrophys 412. Doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031539Google Scholar
  2. Dick SJ (2000) Polar motion: a historical overview on the occasion of the centennial of the International Latitude Service. In: Dick S, McCarthy DD, Luzum B (eds) Polar motion: historical and scientific problems. Proceedings of the IAU colloquium No. 178. ASP conference series, pp 3–26Google Scholar
  3. ESA (1997) The Hipparcos and Tycho catalogues, ESA SP-1200Google Scholar
  4. Fedorov EP, Korsuń AA, Mayor SP, Panchenko NI, Tarady VK, Yatskiv YaS (1972) Dvizhenie polyusa Zemli 1890.0–1969.0. Naukova Dumka, KievGoogle Scholar
  5. Guinot B (2000) History of the Bureau International de l’Heure. In: Dick S, McCarthy DD, Luzum B (eds) Polar motion: historical and scientific problems. Proceedings of the IAU colloquium No. 178. ASP conference Series, pp 175–184Google Scholar
  6. Lieske JH, Lederle T, Fricke W, Morando B (1977) Expression for the precession quantities based upon the IAU (1976) system of astronomical constants. Astron Astrophys 58:1–16Google Scholar
  7. Mathews PM, Herring TA, Buffet BA (2002) Modeling of nutation and precession: new nutation series for nonrigid Earth and insights into the Earth’s interior. J Geophys Res 107:B4. Doi:10.1029/2001JB000390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Melbourne W, Anderle R, Feissel M, King R, McCarthy D et al (1983) Project MERIT standards, USNO Circ. 167Google Scholar
  9. Melchior P (1978) The tides of the planet Earth. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Melchior P, Dejaiffe R (1969) Calcul des déclinaisons et mouvement propres des étoiles du Service International des Latitudes à partir des catalogues méridiens. Ann Obs R Belgique 10:63–339Google Scholar
  11. Newcomb S (1898) Tables of the Sun. Astronomical papers prepared for the use of the American ephemeris and nautical almanac, vol 6. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 1–169Google Scholar
  12. Pavel F, Uhink W (1935) Die Quarzuhren des geodätischen Institutes in Potsdam. Astron Nachr 257:365–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Petit G, Luzum B (eds) (2010) IERS conventions (2010). IERS Technical Note 36Google Scholar
  14. Ron C, Vondrák J (2004) Earth orientation parameters in 1899–1992 based on the new Earth orientation catalogue. In: Finkelstein A, Capitaine N (eds) Journées 2003 systèmes de réferénce spatio-temporels, IAA St. Petersburg and Observatoire de Paris, pp 144–149Google Scholar
  15. Stoyko N (1936) Sur l’irregularité de la rotation de la Terre. C R Acad Sci 203:29Google Scholar
  16. Vondrák J, Ron C (2000) Survey of observational techniques and Hipparcos reanalysis. In: Dick S, McCarthy DD, Luzum B (eds) Polar motion: historical and scientific problems. Proceedings of the IAU colloquium No. 178. ASP Conference Series, pp 206–213Google Scholar
  17. Vondrák J, Ron C (2005) Solution of Earth orientation parameters in the frame of new Earth orientation catalogue. Kinematika i fizika nebesnykh tel, Suppl Ser No. 5, pp 305–310Google Scholar
  18. Vondrák J, Štefka V (2007) Combined astrometric catalogue EOC-3: an improved reference frame for long-term Earth rotation studies. Astron Astrophys 463:783–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vondrák J, Štefka V (2010) The Earth orientation catalog 4: an optical reference frame for monitoring Earth’s orientation in the 20th century. Astron Astrophys 509:A3. Doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vondrák J, Feissel M, Essaïfi, N (1992) Expected accuracy of the 1900–1990 Earth orientation parameters in the Hipparcos reference frame. Astron Astrophys 262:329–340Google Scholar
  21. Vondrák J, Pešek I, Ron C, Čepek A (1998) Earth orientation parameters 1899.7–1992.0 in the ICRS based on the HIPPARCOS reference frame. Publication of the Astronomical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, No. 87, pp 1–56Google Scholar
  22. Vondrák J, Ron C, Štefka V (2008) Solution of Earth orientation parameters in 20th century based on optical astrometry and new catalog EOC-3. In: Jin WJ, Platais I, Perryman MAC (eds) Proceedings of the IAU symposium. 248. A Giant step: from milli- to micro-arcsecond astrometry, pp 89–92Google Scholar
  23. Vondrák J, Ron C, Štefka V (2010) Earth orientation parameters based on EOC-4 astrometric catalog. Acta Geodyn Geomater 7:245–251Google Scholar
  24. Vondrák J, Ron C, Štefka V, Chapanov Ya (2012) New solution of Earth orientation parameters 1900–1992 from optical astrometry, and its linking to ICRF and ITRF. In: Tsvetkov MK, Dimitrijević MS, Tsvetkova K, Kounchev O, Mijajlović Zh (eds) Proceedings of the VII Bulgarian-Serbian astronomical conference, Publ. Astron. Soc ‘Rudjer Bošković’, pp 63–74Google Scholar
  25. Wahr JM (1981) The forced nutations of an elliptical, rotating, elastic and oceanless Earth. Geophys J R Astron Soc 64:705–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yokoyama K, Manabe S, Sakai S (2000) History of the international polar motion service/international latitude service. In: Dick S, McCarthy DD, Luzum B (eds) Polar motion: historical and scientific problems. Proceedings of the IAU colloquium No. 178. ASP conference series, pp 147–162Google Scholar
  27. Yumi S, Yokoyama K (1980) Results of the international latitude service in a homogeneous system 1899.9–1979.0. Central Bureau IPMS, MizusawaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Astronomical InstitutePrague 4Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations