Advertisement

IAG 150 Years pp 477-483 | Cite as

GRACE Gravity Data to Enhance the Modeling of Coseismic Slip Distribution for the 2011 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake

  • M. J. Fuchs
  • T. Broerse
  • A. Hooper
  • J. Pietrzak
  • J. Bouman
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 143)

Abstract

The 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake with 9.0 Mw led to an enormous mass redistribution originated from large deformation due to faulting and had a massive impact on the coastal area of eastern Japan. While the satellite gravity mission GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) can detect the gravitational change caused by this tremendous event, slip distributions are usually derived from GPS, seismic and (in the more particular case) tsunami data. We evaluate the differences between measured and modeled coseismic gravity changes for three fault slip models derived from either GPS and tsunami data, GRACE data, or a combination of all three data types. The data are weighted according to their measurement accuracy in a Bayesian joint inversion approach. We perform a long term average of GRACE data, which increases sensitivity and reduces artefacts, and find that the postseismic gravity change leaks into the derived mean gravity field. We try to reduce this problem by averaging only 6 months of postseismic GRACE data, where the postseismic gravity signal, which superimposes onto the coseismic signal of ≈ 6 μGal (for a geometric based model) peaks approximately 3 months after earthquake occurrence. Consequently fault slip models merely derived from GPS (10 days avg.) and tsunami data ( < 5h time span) show deviations of ≈ 2 μGal to a GRACE 6 monthly averaged combined solution which indicates the difference accumulated from the geometric and gravimetric modelling and the postseismic gravity signal in the GRACE data.

Keywords

Fault-slip distribution GRACE Gravity change GPS data Japan Tohoku-Oki earthquake Joint inversion Tsunami data 

References

  1. Bettadpur S, and the CSR Level-2 Team (2012) Insights into the Earth System mass variability from CSR-RL05 GRACE gravity fields. Geophysical research abstracts, vol 14. EGU2012-6409, EGU General AssemblyGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouman J, Fuchs M, Broerse T, Vermeersen B, Visser P, Schrama E, Schmidt M (2014) Modelling and observing the Mw 8.8 Chile 2010 and Mw 9.0 Japan 2011 Earthquakes using GOCE. In: Chris R, Pascal W (eds) Earth on the edge: science for a sustainable planet. IAG Symposium 139, ISBN 978-3-642-37221-6. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. Broerse DBT, Vermeersen LLA, Riva REM, van der Wal W (2011a) Ocean contribution to co-seismic crustal deformation and geoid anomalies: application to the 2004 December 26 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake. Earth Planet Sci Lett 305:341–349. Doi:10.1016/ j.epsl.2011.03.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broerse DBT, Visser PNAM, Bouman J, Fuchs M, Vermeersen LLA, Schmidt M (2011b) Modelling and observing the 8.8 Chile and 9.0 Japan earthquakes using GOCE. In: Proceedings of the 4th international GOCE user workshop, ESA Publication SP-696Google Scholar
  5. Cambiotti G, Bordoni A, Sabadini R, Colli L (2011) GRACE gravity data help constraining seismic models of the 2004 Sumatran earthquake. J Geophys Res 116:B10403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fuchs M, Bouman J, Broerse T, Visser P, Vermeersen B (2013) Observing coseismic gravity change from the Japan Tohoku-Oki 2011 earthquake with GOCE gravity gradiometry. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. Doi:10.002/jgrb.50381Google Scholar
  7. Fujie G, Ito A, Kodaira S, Takahashi N, Kaneda Y (2006) Confirming sharp bending of the Pacific plate in the northern Japan trench subduction zone by applying a travel time mapping method. Phys Earth Planet Inter 157:72–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fujita M, Ishikawa T, Mochizuki M, Sato M, Toyama S, Katayama M, Kawai K, Matsumoto Y, Yabuki T, Asada A, Colombo O (2006) GPS/Acoustic seafloor geodetic observation: method of data analysis and its application. Earth Planets Space 58:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Han S, Sauber J, Luthcke S, Ji C, Pollitz F (2008) Implications of postseismic gravity change following the great 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake from the regional harmonic analysis of GRACE intersatellite tracking data. J Geophys Res 113(B11):B11413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Han SC, Sauber J, Riva R (2011) Contribution of satellite gravimetry to understanding seismic source processes of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Geophy Res Lett 38:L24312. Doi: 10.1029/2011GL049975Google Scholar
  11. Han SC, Sauber J, Riva R, Okal E (2013) Source parameter inversion for recent great earthquakes from decade-long observation of global gravity fields. J Geophys Res. Doi: 10.1002/jgrb.50116Google Scholar
  12. Hoechner A, Sobolev S, Einarsson I, Wang R (2011) Investigation on after- slip and steady state and transient rheology based on postseismic deformation and geoid change caused by the Sumatra 2004 earthquake. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 12:Q07010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hooper A, Pietrzak J, Simons W, Cui H, Riva R, Naeije M, Terwisscha van Scheltinga A, Schrama E, Stelling G, Socquet A (2012) Importance of horizontal seafloor motion on tsunami height for the Mw=9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Earth Planet Sci Lett 361:469–479. Doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.11.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kido M, Osada Y, Fujimoto H, Hino R, Ito Y (2011) Trench-normal variation in observed seafloor displacements associated with the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Geophys Res Lett 38:L24303. Doi:10.1029/2011GL050057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kodaira S, No T, Nakamura Y, Fujiwara T, Kaiho Y, Miura S, Takahashi N, Kaneda Y, Taira A (2012) Coseismic fault rupture at the trench axis during the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake. Nature Geosci 5:646–650. Doi:10.1038/ngeo1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lay T, Yamazaki Y, Ammon CJ, Cheung KF, Kanamori H (2011) The 2011 Mw 9.0 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake: Comparison of deep-water tsunami signals with finite-fault rupture model predictions. Earth Planets Space 63:797–801. Doi:10.5047/eps.2011.05.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Matsuo K, Heki K (2011) Coseismic gravity changes of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake from satellite gravimetry. Geophys Res Lett 38:L00G12. Doi:10.1029/2011GL049018, 2011Google Scholar
  18. Nishimura T, Munekane H, Yarai H (2011) The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake and its aftershocks observed by GEONET. Earth Planets Space 63:631–636. Doi:10.5047/eps.2011.06.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ogawa R, Heki K (2007) Earthquake-induced gravity field changes slowly recover to initial conditions. Geophys Res Lett (GRL) paper. Doi:10.1029/2007GL029340Google Scholar
  20. Okada Y (1992) Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a halfspace. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75:1135–1154Google Scholar
  21. Ozawa S, Nishimura T, Suito H, Kobayashi T, Tobita M, Imakiire T (2011) Coseismic and postseismic slip of the 2011 magnitude-9 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Nature 475:373–376. Doi:10.1038/nature10227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ozawa S, Nishimura T, Munekane H, Suito H, Kobayashi T, Tobita M, Imakiire T (2012) Preceding, coseismic, and postseismic slips of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake, Japan. J Geophys Res 117:B07404. Doi:10.1029/2011JB009120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Panet I, Pollitz F, Mikhailov V, Diament M, Banerjee P, Grijalva K (2010) Upper mantle rheology from GRACE and GPS postseismic deformation after the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 11(6):Q06008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rodell M, Houser PR, Jambor UEA, Gottschalck J, Mitchell K, Meng CJ, Toll D (2004) The global land data assimilation system. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 85:381–394. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-85-3-381
  25. Sabadini R, Vermeersen B (2004) Global dynamics of the earth: applications of normal mode relaxation theory to solid-earth geophysics. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sakumura C, Bettadpur S Bruinsma S (2014) Ensemble prediction and intercomparison analysis of GRACE time-variable gravity field models. Geophys Res Lett. Doi:10.1002/2013GL058632Google Scholar
  27. Sun W, Okubo S (1993) Surface potential and gravity changes due to internal dislocations in a spherical Earth. II. Application to a finite fault. Geophys J Int 132:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Ries JC, Thompson PF, Watkins MM (2004) GRACE Measurements of mass variability in the earth system. Science 305(5683):503–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang L, Shum CK, Simons FJ, Tapley B, Dai C(2012a) Coseismic and postseismic deformation of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake constrained by GRACE gravimetry. Geophys Res Lett 39:L07301. Doi: 10.1029/2012GL051104Google Scholar
  30. Wang K, Hu Y, He J (2012b) Deformation cycles of subduction earthquakes in a viscoelastic earth. Nature 484:327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. J. Fuchs
    • 1
  • T. Broerse
    • 2
  • A. Hooper
    • 3
  • J. Pietrzak
    • 4
  • J. Bouman
    • 5
  1. 1.Alfons-Goppel-Straße 11MünchenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Geosciences and Remote SensingDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  3. 3.School of Earth and EnvironmentUniversity LeedsLeedsUK
  4. 4.TU DelftDelftThe Netherlands
  5. 5.German Geodetic Research InstituteTechnical University Munich (TUM)MunichGermany

Personalised recommendations