Single-Epoch GNSS Array Integrity: An Analytical Study

Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 142)

Abstract

In this contribution we analyze the integrity of the GNSS array model through the so-called uniformly most powerful invariant (UMPI) test-statistics and their corresponding minimal detectable biases (MDBs). The model considered is characterized by multiple receivers/satellites with known coordinates where the multi-frequency carrier-phase and pseudo-range observables are subject to atmospheric (ionospheric and tropospheric) delays, receiver and satellite clock biases, as well as instrumental delays. Highlighting the role played by the model’s misclosures, analytical multivariate expressions of a few leading test-statistics together with their MDBs are studied that are further accompanied by numerical results of the three GNSSs GPS, Galileo and BeiDou.

Keywords

Array model GNSS misclosures Integrity Minimal detectable bias (MDB) Uniformly most powerful invariant (UMPI) test-statistic 

References

  1. Arnold SF (1981) The theory of linear models and multivariate analysis, vol 2. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Baarda W (1968) A testing procedure for use in geodetic networks. Technical Report, Publications on Geodesy, New Series, vol 2, no. 5. Netherlands Geodetic Commission, DelftGoogle Scholar
  3. Euler HJ, Goad CC (1991) On optimal filtering of GPS dual frequency observations without using orbit information. J Geod 65(2):130–143Google Scholar
  4. Giorgi G, Henkel P, Gunther C (2012) Testing of a statistical approach for local ionospheric disturbances detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE-ION Position Location and Navigation Symp (PLANS), 2012. IEEE, USA, pp 167–173Google Scholar
  5. de Jonge PJ (1998) A processing strategy for the application of the GPS in networks. PhD Thesis, Publication on Geodesy, 46, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands Geodetic Commission, DelftGoogle Scholar
  6. Khanafseh S, Pullen S, Warburton J (2012) Carrier phase ionospheric gradient ground monitor for GBAS with experimental validation. Navigation 59(1):51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Odijk D, Teunissen PJG, Khodabandeh A (2014) Single-frequency PPP-RTK: theory and experimental results. IAG Symp 139:167–173Google Scholar
  8. Schaffrin B, Bock Y (1988) A unified scheme for processing GPS dual-band phase observations. Bull Géod 62(2):142–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Teunissen PJG (1997) GPS double difference statistics: with and without using satellite geometry. J Geod 71(3):137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Teunissen PJG (1998) Minimal detectable biases of GPS data. J Geod 72(4):236–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Teunissen PJG (2000) Testing theory: an introduction. Series on Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning. Delft University Press, DelftGoogle Scholar
  12. Teunissen PJG (2010) Integer least-squares theory for the GNSS compass. J Geod 84(7):433–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Teunissen PJG (2012) A-PPP: Array-aided precise point positioning with global navigation satellite systems. IEEE Trans Signal Process 60(6):2870–2881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Teunissen PJG, de Bakker PF (2012) Single-receiver single-channel multi-frequency GNSS integrity: outliers, slips, and ionospheric disturbances. J Geod 87(2):161–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Spatial SciencesGNSS Research Centre, Curtin University of TechnologyPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Geoscience and Remote SensingDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations