A Peer-to-Peer Virtual Office for Organizational Knowledge Management

  • Enrico Le Coche
  • Carlo Mastroianni
  • Giuseppe Pirrò
  • Massimo Ruffolo
  • Domenico Talia
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4333)

Abstract

Peer-to-peer (P2P) systems enable users to build individual and cooperating autonomous communities. Recently the peer-to-peer paradigm has been proposed as a technological support for Distributed Knowledge Management (DKM). DKM solutions allow an easy sharing of knowledge created by Individual Knowledge Workers (IKWs) inside communities. In such dynamic environments peers can frequently join or leave the network and update their personal knowledge bases. In today’s ubiquitous information society where users need to continue to work at any time from everywhere it is becoming very important to support IKWs with semantic “always on” virtual workspaces providing multi-task and knowledge handling capabilities. This paper presents a semantic virtual office model and its JXTA implementation in the K-link+ system. K-link+ is an ontology based P2P system for cooperative work and knowledge management that provide users with virtual office capabilities.

Keywords

Organizational knowledge management distributed knowledge management peer- to-peer networks ontology virtual office 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bonifacio, M., Bouquet, P., Mameli, G., Nori, M.: KEEx: A Peer-to-Peer Solution for Distributed Knowledge Management. In: Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management PAKM, Vienna, Austria (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bouquet, P., Serafini, L., Zanobini, S.: Semantic coordination: A new approach and an application. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K.P., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 130–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cuel, R.: Trade off between organization and technology in the knowledge management. A case of study. Phd Thesis, University of Udine, Italy (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ehrig, M., Tempich, C., Broekstra, J., Van Harmelen, F., Sabou, M., Siebes, R., Staab, S., Stuckenschmidt, H.: SWAP: Ontology-based Knowledge Management with Peer-to-Peer Technology. In: Proc. of the 1st Workshop Ontologie-basiertes Wissensmanagement, Lucerne, Switzerland (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eiter, T., Leone, N., Mateis, C., Pfeifer, G., Scarcello, F.: A Deductive System for Non-Monotonic Reasoning. In: Fuhrbach, U., Dix, J., Nerode, A. (eds.) LPNMR 1997. LNCS, vol. 1265, pp. 364–375. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gualtieri, A., Ruffolo, M.: An Ontology-Based Framework for Representing Organizational Knowledge. In: Proc. of the I-Know - International Conference on Knowledge Management, Graz, Austria (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lave, S., Wenger, E.: Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral learning. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marshak, D.S.: Groove Virtual Office Enabling Our New Modes of Work. Report by Patricia Seybold Group (2004), http://www.groove.net/pdf/backgrounder/GV0-Marshak.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrico Le Coche
    • 1
  • Carlo Mastroianni
    • 3
  • Giuseppe Pirrò
    • 1
  • Massimo Ruffolo
    • 2
    • 3
  • Domenico Talia
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.DEISUniversità della CalabriaRendeItaly
  2. 2.EXEURA S.r.l., RendeItaly
  3. 3.Istituto di Calcolo e Reti ad Prestazioni (ICAR-CNR) 

Personalised recommendations