User Behavior Analysis of the Open-Ended Document Classification System

  • Yang Sok Kim
  • Byeong Ho Kang
  • Young Ju Choi
  • SungSik Park
  • Gil Cheol Park
  • Seok Soo Kim
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4304)

Abstract

Real-world document classification is an open-ended problem, rather than a close-ended problem, because the document classification domain continually evolves as the time passes. Unlike the close-ended document classification, the participants in the open-ended problem actively take part in the problem solving process. For this reason, it is important to understand the problem solver’s behavioral characteristics. This paper proposes a thorough analysis of them. We found that the problem solving strategies are significantly different among participants because of individual differences in cognition among participants.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Apte, C., Damerau, F., Weiss, S.M.: Automated learning of decision rules for text categorization. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 12(3), 233–251 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hirsch, L., Saeedi, M., Hirsch, R.: Evolving Rules for Document Classification. In: Keijzer, M., Tettamanzi, A.G.B., Collet, P., van Hemert, J.I., Tomassini, M. (eds.) EuroGP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3447, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goel, V.: Comparison of Well-Structured & Ill-Structured Task Environments and Problem Spaces. In: Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1992)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cook, J.: Bridging the Gap Between Empirical Data on Open-Ended Tutorial Interactions and Computational Models. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12, 85–99 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andriessen, J., Sandberg, J.: Where is Education Heading and How About AI? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 10, 130–150 (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shaw, M.L.G., Woodward, J.B.: Modeling expert knowledge. Knowledge Acquisition 2(3), 179–206 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dillon, R.F., Schmeck, R.R.: Individual Differences in Cognition, vol. 1, p. 1983. Academic Press, Inc., New York (1983)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hong, N.S.: The Relationship Between Well-Structured and Ill-Structured Problem Solving in Multimedia Simulation, in The Graduate School, College of Education, The Pennsylvania State University (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Byeong Ho, K.: Validating Knowledge Acquisition: Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules, in School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kang, B., Compton, P., Preston, P.: Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules: Evaluation and Possibilities. In: 9th AAAI-Sponsored Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, Banff, Canada, University of Calgary (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park, S.S., Kim, Y.S., Kang, B.H.: Web Document Classification: Managing Context Change. In: IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet 2004, Madrid, Spain (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim, Y.S., et al.: Adaptive Web Document Classification with MCRDR. In: International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing ITCC 2004, Orleans, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Compton, P., Richards, D.: Generalising ripple-down rules. In: Dieng, R., Corby, O. (eds.) EKAW 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1937, pp. 380–386. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yang Sok Kim
    • 1
  • Byeong Ho Kang
    • 1
  • Young Ju Choi
    • 1
  • SungSik Park
    • 1
  • Gil Cheol Park
    • 2
  • Seok Soo Kim
    • 2
  1. 1.School of ComputingUniversity of Tasmania, Sandy BayTasmaniaAustralia
  2. 2.School of Information & MultimediaHannam UniversityDaejeonKorea

Personalised recommendations