Input-output conformance test theory for discrete systems has established itself in research and industry already. A couple of years ago also input-output conformance test theories for timed systems were defined. The next step is to develop conformance test theory for hybrid systems as well. In this paper we present a conformance relation for model-based testing of hybrid systems and we formalize tests for hybrid systems.


Hybrid System Test Generation Output Action Input Action Brake System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Alur, R., Dang, T., Esposito, J., Fierro, R., Hur, Y., Ivancic, F., Kumar, V., Lee, I., Mishra, P., Pappas, G., Sokolsky, O.: Hierarchical Hybrid Modeling of Embedded Systems. In: Henzinger, T.A., Kirsch, C.M. (eds.) EMSOFT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2211, p. 14. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Briones, L.B., Brinksma, E.: A test generation framework for quiescent real-time systems. In: Grabowski, J., Nielsen, B. (eds.) FATES 2004. LNCS, vol. 3395, pp. 64–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cuijpers, P.J.L., Reniers, M.A., Heemels, W.P.M.H.: Hybrid transition systems. Computer Science Reports 02-12, TU/e Department of Computer Science (December 2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Henzinger, T.A., Ho, P.H., Wong-Toi, H.: Hytech: A model checker for hybrid systems. In: Software Tools for Transfer Technology, vol. Transfer 1 (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kirchen, M., Tripakis, S.: Black-Box Conformance Testing for Real-Time Systems. In: Graf, S., Mounier, L. (eds.) SPIN 2004. LNCS, vol. 2989, pp. 109–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Larsen, K., Mikucionis, M., Nielsen, B.: Online Testing of Real-time Systems. In: Grabowski, J., Nielsen, B. (eds.) FATES 2004. LNCS, vol. 3395, pp. 79–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tan, L., Sokolsky, O., Lee, I.: Specification-based Testing with Linear Temporal Logic. In: IEEE Internation Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI 2004) (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tretmans, J.: Test Generation with Inputs, Outputs and Repetitive Quiescence. Software—Concepts and Tools 17(3), 103–120 (1996)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tretmans, J.: Testing Concurrent Systems: A Formal Approach. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Mauw, S. (eds.) CONCUR 1999. LNCS, vol. 1664, pp. 46–65. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tretmans, J., Brinksma, E.: TorX: Automated Model Based Testing. In: Hartman, A., Dussa-Ziegler, K. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Model-Driven Software Engineering (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Beek, D.A., Man, K.L., Reniers, M.A., Rooda, J.E., Schiffelers, R.R.H.: Syntax and Consistent Equation Semantics of Hybrid Chi. Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming, special issue on hybrid systems (to appear)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    van Osch, M.: Hybrid input-output conformance and test generation. Technical report, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michiel van Osch
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceTechnische Universiteit EindhovenEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations