Viewing Scenes Occluded by Smoke

  • Arturo Donate
  • Eraldo Ribeiro
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4292)

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the problem of reconstructing images of scenes occluded by thick smoke. We propose a simple and effective algorithm that creates a single clear image of the scene given only a video sequence as input. Our method is based on two key observations. First, an increase in smoke density induces a decrease in both image contrast and color saturation. Measuring the decay of the high-frequency content in each video frame provides an effective way of quantifying the amount of contrast reduction. Secondly, the dynamic nature of the smoke causes the scene to be partially visible at times. By dividing the video sequence into subregions, our method is able to select the subregion-frame containing the least amount of smoke occlusion over time. Current experiments on different data sets show very promising results.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Efros, A., Isler, V., Shi, J., Visontai, M.: Seeing through water. In: Saul, L.K., Weiss, Y., Bottou, L. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 17, pp. 393–400. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Treyin, B.U., Dedeoglu, Y., Cetin, A.E.: Wavelet based real-time smoke detection in video. In: European Signal Processing Conference (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li, Z., Khananian, A., Fraser, R.H., Cihlar, J.: Automatic detection of fire smoke using artificial neural networks and threshold approaches applied to avhrr imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 39, 1859–1870 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chung, Y.S., Le, H.V.: Detection of forest-fire smoke plumes by satellite imagery. Atmos. Environ. 18, 2143–2151 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Narasimhan, S.G., Nayar, S.K.: Contrast restoration of weather degraded images. IEEE PAMI 25, 713–724 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Narasimhan, S.G., Nayar, S.K.: Interactive deweathering of an image using physical models. In: IEEE Workshop on Color and Photometric Methods in Computer Vision, Conjunction with ICCV (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garg, K., Nayar, S.K.: Detection and removal of rain from videos. In: International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 528–535 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nayar, S.K., Narasimhan, S.G.: Vision in bad weather. In: International Conference on Computer Vision (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schechner, Y.Y., Narasimhan, S.G., Nayar, S.K.: Polarization-based vision through haze. Applied Optics 42, 511–525 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shwartz, S., Namer, E., Schechner, Y.Y.: Blind haze separation. In: International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fedkiw, R., Stam, J., Jensen, H.W.: Visual simulation of smoke. In: SIGGRAPH 2001: Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pp. 15–22. ACM Press, New York (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: Digital Image Processing. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Field, D., Brady, N.: Visual sensitivity, blur and the sources of variability in the amplitude spectra of natural scenes. Vision Research 37, 3367–3383 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, Z., Simoncelli, E.P.: Local phase coherence and the perception of blur. In: Thrun, S., Saul, L., Schölkopf, B. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 16. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arturo Donate
    • 1
  • Eraldo Ribeiro
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer SciencesFlorida Institute of TechnologyMelbourneUSA

Personalised recommendations