Community-Driven Ontology Evolution Based on Folksonomies

  • Domenico Gendarmi
  • Filippo Lanubile
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4277)

Abstract

The Semantic Web mission is to enable a better organization of the Web content to improve the searching, navigation and integration of the available information. Although the Semantic Web is intended for machines, the process of creating and maintaining it is a social one: only people, for example, have necessary skills to create and maintain ontologies. While most existing ontologies are designed by single individuals or small groups of experts, actual ontology users are not involved in the development process. Such an individual approach in creating ontologies, lead to a weak community grounding. On the other hand, Social Software is becoming increasingly popular among web users, giving opportunities to exploit the potential of collaboration within a community. Tools like wikis and folksonomies allow users to easily create new content and share contributions over a social network. Social Software tools can go beyond their current limits, by exploiting the power provided by semantic technologies. Conversely, Semantic Web tools can benefit from the ability of Social Software in fostering collaboration among users, by lowering entry barriers. In this paper we propose a new approach for ontology evolution, considering collaborative tagging systems as an opportunity to complement classic approaches used in maintaining ontologies.

Keywords

folksonomy collaborative tagging ontology evolution social software semantic web semantic collaboration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Begelman, G., Keller, P., Smadja, F.: Automated Tag Clustering: Improving search and exploration in the tag space. In: Proc. of WWW 2006, Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davies, J., Fensel, D., van Harmelen, F.: Towards the Semantic Web: Ontology-driven Knowledge Management. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., Gomez, L.M., Dumais, S.T.: The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Communications of the ACM 30(11), 964–971 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Golder, S., Huberman, B.: Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science 32(2), 198–208 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gruber, T.: Folksonomy of Ontology: A Mash-up of Apples and Oranges. In: First on-Line conference on Metadata and Semantics Research (MTSR 2005) (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gruber, T.: Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. International Journal Human-Computer Studies 43, 907–928 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haase, P., Volker, J., Sure, Y.: Management of dynamic knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management 9(5), 97–107 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heymann, P., Garcia-Molina, H.: Collaborative Creation of Communal Hierarchical Taxonomies in Social Tagging Systems. Technical Report InfoLab 2006-10, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mathes, A.: Folksonomies-Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata. Technical Report LIS590CMC, Computer Mediated Communication, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCulloch, E., Macgregor, G.: Collaborative Tagging as a Knowledge Organisation and Resource Discovery Tool. Library Review 55(5) (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Merholz, P.: Clay Shirky’s Viewpoints are Overrated (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    O’Reilly, T.: What is Web 2.0 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schmitz, P.: Inducing Ontology from Flickr Tags. In: Proc. of WWW 2006, Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shirky, C.: Ontology is Overrated: Categories, Links, and Tags (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vander Wal, T.: Folksonomy Definition and Wikipedia (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu, X., Zhang, L., Yu, Y.: Exploring social annotations for the semantic web. In: Proc. of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 417–426 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xu, Z., Fu, Y., Mao, J., Su, D.: Towards the Semantic Web: Collaborative Tag Suggestions. In: Proc. of WWW 2006, Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Domenico Gendarmi
    • 1
  • Filippo Lanubile
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversity of BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations