Abstract

The theoretical results achieved in the ontology engineering field in the last fifteen years are of incontestable value for the prospected large scale take-up of semantic technologies. Their range of application in real-world projects is, however, so far comparatively limited, despite the growing number of ontologies online available. This restricted impact was confirmed in a three month empirical study, in which we examined over 34 contemporary ontology development projects from a process- and costs-oriented perspective. In this paper we give an account of the results of this study. We conclude that ontology engineering research should strive for a unified, lightweight and component-based methodological framework, principally targeted at domain experts, in addition to consolidating the existing approaches.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Benjamins, V.R., Fensel, D., Decker, S., Gómez-Pérez, A: (KA)2: Building Ontologies for the Internet. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 51(1), 687–712 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernaras, A., Laresgoiti, I., Corera, J.: Building and Reusing Ontologies for Electrical Network Applications. In: European Confernce on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 1996) (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Corcho, O., Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A.: Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies: where is their meeting point? Data & Knowledge Engineering 46(1), 41–64 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Euzenat, J.: Building Consensual Knowledge Bases: Context and Architecture. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conference on Building and Sharing Very Large-Scale Knowledge Bases (KBKS), Enschede, the Netherlands, pp. 143–155 (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Sierra, J.P., Sierra, A.P.: Building a Chemical Ontology Using Methontology and the Ontology Design Environment. Intelligent Systems 14(1) (January/February 1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gangemi, A., Pisanelli, D.M., Steve, G.: Ontology Integration: Experiences with Medical Terminologies. In: Formal Ontology in Information Systems. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology and Information Systems. In: Proc. of the 1st Int. Conf. on Formal Ontologies in Information Systems (FOIS) (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Henderson-Sellers, B.: Method engineering for OO system development. Commmunications of the ACM 46(10), 73–78 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hristozova, M., Sterling, L.: Experiences with Ontology Development for Value-Added Publishing. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ontologies in Agent Systems OAS03 co-located with the AAMAS (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones, D., Bench-Capon, T., Visser, P.: Methodologies for Ontology Development. In: Proc of the IT&KNOWS Conference of the 15th IFIP World Computer Congress (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koenderink, N.J.J.P., Top, J.L., van Vliet, L.J.: Expert-Based Ontology Construction: A Case-Study in Horticulture. In: Proceedings of the International Database and Expert Systems Applications Workshops DEXA 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laresgoiti, I., Anjewierden, A., Bernaras, A., Corera, J., Schreiber, A.T., Wielinga, B.J.: Ontologies as vehicles for reuse: a mini-experiment. In: Proceedings of the 10th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop K-CAP 1996, pp. 1–21 (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lau, T., Sure, Y.: Introducing Ontology-based Skills Management at a large Insurance Company. In: Modellierung in der Praxis - Modellierung für die Praxis, Tutzing, Deutschland, March 25-27, pp. 123–134 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lenat, D.B., Guha, R.V.: Building large knowledge-based systems. Representation and inference in the CYC project. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1990)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maedche, A.: Ontology Learning for the Semantic Web. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paslaru Bontas, E.: Practical Experiences in Building Ontology-Based Retrieval Systems. In: Proceedings of the 1st International ISWC Workshop on Semantic Web Case Studies and Best Practices for eBusiness SWCASE (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paslaru Bontas, E., Mochol, M., Tolksdorf, R.: Case Studies in Ontology Reuse. In: Proc. of the 5th International Conference on Knowledge Management IKNOW 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pinto, H.S., Martins, J.: Reusing ontologies. In: AAAI 2000 Spring Symposium on Bringing Knowledge to Business Processes, pp. 77–84 (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pinto, H.S., Tempich, C., Staab, S.: DILIGENT: Towards a fine-grained methodology for DIstributed, Loosely-controlled and evolvInG Engingeering of oNTologies. In: Proc. of the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2004), pp. 393–397 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dip European Project. Financial Ontology (Deliverable 10.3 DIP FP6 - 507483) (2005), http://dip.semanticweb.org/documents/D10.3.pdf
  22. 22.
    Russ, T., Valente, A., MacGregor, R., Swartout, W.: Practical Experiences in Trading Off Ontology Usability and Reusability. In: Proc. of the Knowledge Acquisition Workshop KAW 1999 (1999)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sudman, S., Bradburn, N.M.: Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design, 1st edn. Jossey-Bass (1982)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sure, Y., Bloehdorn, S., Haase, P., Hartmann, J., Oberle, D.: The SWRC Ontology - Semantic Web for Research Communities. In: Bento, C., Cardoso, A., Dias, G. (eds.) EPIA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3808, pp. 218–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sure, Y., Tempich, C., Vrandecic, D.: Ontology Engineering Methodologies. In: Semantic Web Technologies: Trends and Research in Ontology-based Systems. Wiley, UK (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tautz, C., Althoff, K.D.: A Case Study on Engineering Ontologies and Related Processes for Sharing Software Engineering Experience. In: Proc. of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering SEKE 2000 (2000)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tempich, C., Pinto, H.S., Staab, S.: Ontology Engineering Revisited: An Iterative Case Study. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 110–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Uschold, M., Healy, M., Williamson, K., Clark, P., Woods, S.: Ontology Reuse and Application. In: Int. Conference on Formal Ontology and Information Systems FOIS 1998 (1998)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Uschold, M., King, M., Moralee, S., Zorgios, Y.: The Enterprise Ontology. Knowledge Engineering Review 13(1), 31–89 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhao, G., Kingston, J., Kerremans, K., Coppens, F., Verlinden, R., Temmerman, R., Meersman, R.: Towards an Ontology of Forensics covering Financial Securities Fraud. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Regulatory Ontologies WORM 2004 co-located with the OTM Conferences (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elena Paslaru Bontas Simperl
    • 1
  • Christoph Tempich
    • 2
  1. 1.Free University of BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Institute AIFBUniversity of KarlsruheKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations