This paper discusses the evolution of the INCA demonstrator through a number of re-implementations that have investigated the applicability of various aspects of multi-agent technology to the management of Community Care. The latest experiences are described, making full use of the latest developments in semantic agents to provide a richer, more rigorous and highly scalable implementation than the previous demonstrators. This is presented in the context of a simulated real-world environment, based on knowledge of the actual operational environment within which the fully deployed agents would be expected to work. In particular the grouping of different communities of agents so that scalable solutions can be fully implemented and rigorously tested. So for example the agents that one would normally expect within a single household, including the home unit and the associated sensors, alarms etc. are treated as one group, and a care provider and the associated carers also. Not only does this reduce the communications overhead but also leads to simplifications in implementation as each class of agent only needs to be implemented once and individual instances are characterized by initial configurations and their interactions with their peers.


Care Provider Informal Carer Carer Agent Care Coordinator Home Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Beer, M.D., Bench-Capon, T., Sixsmith, A.: The Delivery of Effective Integrated Community Care with the Aid of Agents. In: Hui, L.C.-K., Lee, D.-L. (eds.) ICSC 1999. LNCS, vol. 1749, pp. 393–398. Springer, Heidelberg (1999b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beer, M.D., Huang, W., Sixsmith, A.: Using Agents to Build a Practical Implementation of the INCA (Intelligent Community Alarm) System. In: Jain, L.C., Chen, Z., Ichalkaranje, N. (eds.) Intelligent Agents & their Applications, pp. 320–345. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beer, M.D., Hill, R., Sixsmith, A.: Building an Agent Based Community Care Demonstrator on a Worldwide Agent Platform. In: Agents and Healthcare, Barcelona, February 2003, pp. 19–34 (2003) (published in the Witterstein series on Multi-agent Systems)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hill, R., Polovina, S., Beer, M.: Managing Community Health-care Information in a Multi-Agent System Environment. In: Multi-Agent Systems for Medicine, Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (MAS*BIOMED), AAMAS 2005, Utrecht, Netherlands, pp. 35–49 (July 2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Louis, V., Martinez, T.: An operational model for the FIPA-ACL semantics. In: AAMAS 2005 Agent Communication Workshop, Utrecht, NL (July 2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lunn, K., Sixsmith, A., Lindsay, A., Vaarama, M.: Traceability in requirements through process modelling, applied to social care applications. Information & Software Technology 45(15), 1045–1052 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Preece, A.D., Hui, K.-Y., Gray, W.A., Marti, P., Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Jones, D.M., Cu, Z.: The KRAFT Architecture for Knowledge Fusion and Transformation. In: 19th SGES International Conference on Knowledge-based Systems and Applied Artificial Intelligence (ES 1999), Springer, Berlin (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Willmott, S., et al.: Agentcities Network Architecture. In: Proceedings of the first International Workshop on Challenges in Open Agent Systems (July 2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin D. Beer
    • 1
  • Richard Hill
    • 1
  1. 1.Web & Multi-Agents Research Group, Faculty of Arts, Computing, Engineering & SciencesSheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations