A Machine Learning Framework Using SOMs: Applications in the Intestinal Motility Assessment

  • Fernando Vilariño
  • Panagiota Spyridonos
  • Jordi Vitrià
  • Carolina Malagelada
  • Petia Radeva
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4225)

Abstract

Small Bowel Motility Assessment by means of Wireless Capsule Video Endoscopy constitutes a novel clinical methodology in which a capsule with a micro-camera attached to it is swallowed by the patient, emitting a RF signal which is recorded as a video of its trip throughout the gut. In order to overcome the main drawbacks associated with this technique -mainly related to the large amount of visualization time required-, our efforts have been focused on the development of a machine learning system, built up in sequential stages, which provides the specialists with the useful part of the video, rejecting those parts not valid for analysis. We successfully used Self Organized Maps in a general semi-supervised framework with the aim of tackling the different learning stages of our system. The analysis of the diverse types of images and the automatic detection of intestinal contractions is performed under the perspective of intestinal motility assessment in a clinical environment.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ali, A., Santisi, J.M., Vargo, J.: Video capsule endoscopy: A voyage beyond the end of the scope. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 71(5), 415–424 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anzali, S., Gasteiger, S.: The use of self-organizing neural networks in drug design. Perspectives 11, 273–299 (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    TEC Assessments. Wireless capsule endoscopy. Technical Report 17, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Biesen, W., Sieben, G.: Application of Kohonen neural networks fort the non-morphological distinction between glomerular and tubular renal disease. Neph. Dial Transp. 13, 59–66 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christodoulo, C.I., Pattichis, C.S.: Unsupervised pattern recognition for the classification of EMG signals. IEEE Trans. on Biom. Eng. 46(2), 169–178 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eliakim, R.: Wireless capsule video endoscopy: three years of experience. Wd. Journ. Gastro. 10, 1238–1239 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fireman, Z., Glukhovsky, A.: W. capsule endoscopy. IMAJ 4, 717–719 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fireman, Z., Mahanja, E.: Diagnosing small bowel crohn’s disease with wireless capsule endoscopy. Gut 52, 390–392 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glass, J.O., Reddick, W.E.: Hybrid artificial neural network segmentation and classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DEMRI) of osteosarcoma. Magn. Res. Im. 16(9), 1075–1083 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: Digital Image Processing, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gostout, C., Adler, D.G.: State of the art, wireless capsule endoscopy. Hospital Physician 39(5), 14–22 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kohonen, T.: Self-Organized Maps. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lux, C.L., Atellzig, A.: A neural network approach to the analysis and classification of human craniofacial growth. Grow. Devel. Asign 62(3), 95–106 (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Quigley, E.M.: Gastric and small intestinal motility in health and disease. Gastroenterology Clinics of North America 25, 113–145 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rey, J.F.: European society of gastroenterology. Guideline for video capsule endoscopy 36, 656–658 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Russ, J.C.: The Image Processing Handbook, 2nd edn. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1994)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schulmann, K., Hollerbach, S.: Feasibility and diagnostic utility of video capsule endoscopy for the detection of small bowel polyps in patients with hereditary polyposis syndromes. Am. Jour. Gastro. 100(1), 27 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spyridonos, P., Vilariño, F., et al.: Identification of intestinal motility events of capsule endoscopy video analysis. In: Blanc-Talon, J., Philips, W., Popescu, D.C., Scheunders, P. (eds.) ACIVS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3708, pp. 531–537. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vapnik, V.: The nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vilariño, F., Kuncheva, L., et al.: ROC curves and video analysis optimization in intestinal capsule endoscopy. Pat. Recog. Let. 27(8), 875–881 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vilariño, F., Spyridonos, P., et al.: Experiments with SVM and stratified sampling with an imbalanced problem: Detection of intestinal contractions. In: Singh, S., Singh, M., Apte, C., Perner, P. (eds.) ICAPR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3687, pp. 783–791. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Walker, A.J., Cross, S.S.: Visualisation of biomedical datasets by use of growing cell structure networks: A novel diagnostic classification technique. Lancet 354, 1518–1521 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando Vilariño
    • 1
  • Panagiota Spyridonos
    • 1
  • Jordi Vitrià
    • 1
  • Carolina Malagelada
    • 2
  • Petia Radeva
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Vision CenterUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBellaterraSpain
  2. 2.Hospital Vall d’HebronBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations