Advertisement

Feature Selection and Activity Recognition from Wearable Sensors

  • Susanna Pirttikangas
  • Kaori Fujinami
  • Tatsuo Nakajima
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4239)

Abstract

We describe our data collection and results on activity recognition with wearable, coin-sized sensor devices. The devices were attached to four different parts of the body: right thigh and wrist, left wrist and to a necklace on 13 different testees. In this experiment, data was from 17 daily life examples from male and female subjects. Features were calculated from triaxial accelerometer and heart rate data within different sized time windows. The best features were selected with forward-backward sequential search algorithm. Interestingly, acceleration mean values from the necklace were selected as important features. Two classifiers (multilayer perceptrons and kNN classifiers) were tested for activity recognition, and the best result (90.61 % aggregate recognition rate for 4-fold cross validation) was achieved with a kNN classifier.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bao, L., Intille, S.S.: Activity Recognition from User-Annotated Acceleration Data. In: Ferscha, A., Mattern, F. (eds.) PERVASIVE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3001, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fujinami, K., Nakajima, T.: Sentient artefacts: Acquiring user’s context through daily objects. In: Enokido, T., Yan, L., Xiao, B., Kim, D.Y., Dai, Y.-S., Yang, L.T. (eds.) EUC-WS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3823, pp. 335–344. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fujinami, K., Pirttikangas, S., Nakajima, T.: Who opened the door?: Towards the implicit user identification for sentient artefacts. In: Fishkin, K.P., Schiele, B., Nixon, P., Quigley, A. (eds.) PERVASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3968, pp. 107–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fukunaga: Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition. Academic Press, London (1990)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huynh, T., Schiele, B.: Analyzing features for activity recognition. In: Proc. Joint Conf. Smart Objects and Ambient Intelligence (sOc-EUSAI 2005), pp. 159–163 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kukolich, L., Lippmann, R.: Lnknet user’s guide (August 1999) (Available, 18.4.2006), http://www.ll.mit.edu/IST/lnknet/
  7. 7.
    Kern, N., Schiele, B., Schmidt, A.: Multi-sensor Activity Context Detection for Wearable Computing. In: Aarts, E., Collier, R.W., van Loenen, E., de Ruyter, B. (eds.) EUSAI 2003. LNCS, vol. 2875, pp. 220–232. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yamabe, T., Takagi, A., Nakajima, T.: Citron: A context information acquisition framework for personal devices. In: Proc. the 11th IEEE Int. Conf. Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications (RTCSA 2005), pp. 489–495 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanna Pirttikangas
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kaori Fujinami
    • 2
  • Tatsuo Nakajima
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Information EngineeringUniversity of OuluFinland
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceWaseda UniversityJapan

Personalised recommendations