The Proper Fiducial Argument

  • F. Hampel
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4123)

Abstract

The paper describes the proper interpretation of the fiducial argument, as given by Fisher in (only) his first papers on the subject. It argues that far from being a quaint, little, isolated idea, this was the first attempt to build a bridge between aleatory probabilities (the only ones used by Neyman) and epistemic probabilities (the only ones used by Bayesians), by implicitly introducing, as a new type, frequentist epistemic probabilities. Some (partly rather unknown) reactions by other statisticians are discussed, and some rudiments of a new, unifying general theory of statistics are given which uses upper and lower probabilities and puts fiducial probability into a larger framework. Then Fisher’s pertaining 1930 paper is being reread in the light of present understanding, followed by some short sections on the (legitimate) aposteriori interpretation of confidence intervals, and on fiducial probabilities as limits of lower probabilities.

Keywords

Fiducial argument fiducial probability R.A. Fisher foundations of statistics statistical inference aleatory probabilities epistemic probabilities structure of epistemic probabilities upper and lower probabilities frequentist statistics axiom of frequentist epistemic probability Bayesian statistics intersubjective statistics bets odds fair bets successful bets confidence interval aposteriori interpretation of confidence intervals Neyman-Pearson statistics Behrens-Fisher problem 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bartlett, M.S.: Complete simultaneous fiducial distributions. Ann. Math. Statist. 10, 129–138 (1939)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bayes, T.: An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A 53, 370–418 (1763); Reprinted in Biometrika, 45, 293–315 (1958); Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability. In: Pearson, E.S., Kendall, M.G. (eds.), Griffin, London, pp. 131–153 (1970)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bennett, J.H.: Collected Papers of R.A. Fisher, vol. II (1925-1931), The University of Adelaide (1972)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bernoulli, J.: Ars Conjectandi, Thurnisiores, Basel (1713); Reprinted in Werke von Jakob Bernoulli, vol. 1. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel (1975)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brönnimann, D.: Die Entwicklung des Wahrscheinlichkeitsbegriffs von 1654 bis 1718, Diplomarbeit, Seminar für Statistik, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Choquet, G.: Theory of capacities. Ann. Inst. Fourier 5, 131–295 (1953/1954)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cox, D.R., Hinkley, D.V.: Theoretical Statistics. Chapman and Hall, London (1974)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann. Math. Statist. 38, 325–339 (1967)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dempster, A.P.: A generalization of Bayesian inference. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 30, 205–245 (1968)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Efron, B.: R.A. Fisher in the 21st Century: Invited paper presented at the 1996 R. Statistical Science 13(2), 95–122 (1998)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fine, T.L.: Theories of Probability. Academic, New York (1973)MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fisher, R.A.: Inverse probability. Proc. of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 26, 528–535 (1930); Reprinted in Collected Papers of R.A. Fisher, Bennett, J.H. (ed.) vol. 2, pp. 428–436, University of Adelaide (1972)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fisher, R.A.: The concepts of inverse probability and fiducial probability referring to unknown parameters. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A 139, 343–348 (1933)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fisher, R.A.: The fiducial argument in statistical inference. Annals of Eugenics 6, 391–398 (1935)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fisher, R.A.: Statistical methods and scientific induction. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 17, 69–78 (1955)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fisher, R.A.: Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference, Oliver and Boyd, London (1956); 2nd ed. 1959, reprinted (1967)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fraser, D.A.S.: The Structure of Inference. Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. Wiley, New York (1968)MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Good, I.J.: Subjective probability as the measure of a non-measurable set. In: Nagel, E., Suppes, P., Tarski, A. (eds.) Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, pp. 319–329. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford (1962)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hampel, F.: Fair bets, successful bets, and the foundations of statistics. In: Abstract, Second World Congress of the Bernoulli Society, Uppsala (1990)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hampel, F.: Some thoughts about the foundations of statistics. In: Morgenthaler, S., Ronchetti, E., Stahel, W.A. (eds.) New Directions in Statistical Data Analysis and Robustness, pp. 125–137. Birkhäuser, Basel (1993)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hampel, F.: On the philosophical foundations of statistics: Bridges to Huber’s work, and recent results. In: Rieder, H. (ed.) Robust Statistics, Data Analysis, and Computer Intensive Methods, in Honor of Peter Huber’s 60th Birthday. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 109, pp. 185–196. Springer, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hampel, F.: What can the foundations discussion contribute to data analysis? And what may be some of the future directions in robust methods and data analysis? J. Statist. Planning Infer. 57, 7–19 (1997)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hampel, F.: How different are frequentist and Bayes solutions near total ignorance? In: Proc. 51th Session of the ISI, Contrib. Papers, Book 2, Istanbul, pp. 25–26 (1997)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hampel, F.: On the foundations of statistics: A frequentist approach. In: de Miranda, M.S., Pereira, I. (eds.) Estatística: a diversidade na unidade, pp. 77–97. Edições Salamandra, Lda., Lisboa, Portugal (1998)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hampel, F.: Is statistics too difficult? Canad. J. Statist. 26(3), 497–513 (1998)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hampel, F.: An outline of a unifying statistical theory. In: de Cooman, G., Fine, T.L., Seidenfeld, T. (eds.) Proc. of the 2nd Internat. Symp. on Imprecise Probabilities and their Applications, Cornell University, June 26-29, pp. 205–212. Shaper Publishing, Maastricht (2000)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hampel, F.: Why is statistics still not unified? In: Proc. 53rd Session of the ISI, Contrib. Papers, Book 1, Seoul, pp. 73–74 (2001)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Huber, P.J.: The use of Choquet capacities in statistics. Bull. Internat. Statist. Inst. 45, 181–188 (1973)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Huber, P.J.: Kapazitäten statt Wahrscheinlichkeiten? Gedanken zur Grundlegung der Statistik. Jber. Deutsch. Math. Verein. 78(2), 81–92 (1976)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Huber, P.J.: Robust Statistics. Wiley, New York (1981)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Huber, P.J., Strassen, V.: Minimax tests and the Neyman–Pearson lemma for capacities. Ann. Statist. 1(2), 251–263 (1973); Corr.: 2, 223–224Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kolmogoroff, A.: Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. Springer, Berlin (1933)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kolmogorov, A.N.: The estimation of the mean and precision of a finite sample of observations. Section 5: Fisher’s fiducial limits and fiducial probability. Bull. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., Math. Ser. 6, 3–32 (1942) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Koopman, B.O.: The bases of probability. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 46, 763–774 (1940)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kyburg, H.E.: Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown (1961)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lambert, J.H.: Neues Organon, oder Gedanken über die Erforschung und Be- zeichnung des Wahren und dessen Unterscheidung von Irrtum und Schein, Leipzig (1764); Reprinted by Olms of Hildesheim as the first two volumes of LAMBERT’s Philosophische Schriften (1965)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Morgenstern, C.: Gesammelte Werke. R. Piper & Co., München (1965); Selected translations in: M. Knight, Christian Morgenstern’s Galgenlieder. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles (1963)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Neyman, J.: Inductive behavior as a basic concept of philosophy of science. Rev. Internat. Statist. Inst. 25, 7–22 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Neyman, J.: Foundations of behavioristic statistics, Foundations of Statistical Inference. In: Godambe, V.P., Sprott, D.A. (eds.) Holt, Rinehart and Winston of Canada, Toronto (1971)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pearson, E.S., Wishart, J.: Student’s Collected Papers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1958)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pitman, E.J.G.: Statistics and science. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 52, 322–330 (1957)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rao, C.R.: Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications. Wiley, London (1965) (2nd edition 1973)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)MATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shafer, G.: Non-Additive Probabilities in the Work of Bernoulli and Lambert. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 19(4), 309–370 (1978)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Smith, C.A.B.: Consistency in statistical inference and decision. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 23, 1–37 (1961)MATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Strassen, V.: Messfehler und Information, Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Geb. 2, 273–305 (1964)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Student: The probable error of a mean. Biometrika 6, 1–25 (1908)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tukey, J.W.: A smooth invertibility theorem. Ann. Math. Statist. 29, 581–584 (1958)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tukey, J.W.: Handouts for the Wald Lectures (1958); Tukey, J.W.: The Collected Works. More Mathematical, vol. VI (1938–1984); Mallows, C.L. (ed.), Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software, ch. 10, Pacific Grove, CA, pp. 119–148 (1990)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Walley, P.: Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. Chapman and Hall, London (1991)MATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zabell, S.L.: R.A. Fisher and the fiducial argument. Statistical Science 7(3), 369–387 (1992)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Hampel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations