The Proper Fiducial Argument
Abstract
The paper describes the proper interpretation of the fiducial argument, as given by Fisher in (only) his first papers on the subject. It argues that far from being a quaint, little, isolated idea, this was the first attempt to build a bridge between aleatory probabilities (the only ones used by Neyman) and epistemic probabilities (the only ones used by Bayesians), by implicitly introducing, as a new type, frequentist epistemic probabilities. Some (partly rather unknown) reactions by other statisticians are discussed, and some rudiments of a new, unifying general theory of statistics are given which uses upper and lower probabilities and puts fiducial probability into a larger framework. Then Fisher’s pertaining 1930 paper is being reread in the light of present understanding, followed by some short sections on the (legitimate) aposteriori interpretation of confidence intervals, and on fiducial probabilities as limits of lower probabilities.
Keywords
Fiducial argument fiducial probability R.A. Fisher foundations of statistics statistical inference aleatory probabilities epistemic probabilities structure of epistemic probabilities upper and lower probabilities frequentist statistics axiom of frequentist epistemic probability Bayesian statistics intersubjective statistics bets odds fair bets successful bets confidence interval aposteriori interpretation of confidence intervals Neyman-Pearson statistics Behrens-Fisher problemPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Bartlett, M.S.: Complete simultaneous fiducial distributions. Ann. Math. Statist. 10, 129–138 (1939)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Bayes, T.: An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A 53, 370–418 (1763); Reprinted in Biometrika, 45, 293–315 (1958); Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability. In: Pearson, E.S., Kendall, M.G. (eds.), Griffin, London, pp. 131–153 (1970)Google Scholar
- 3.Bennett, J.H.: Collected Papers of R.A. Fisher, vol. II (1925-1931), The University of Adelaide (1972)Google Scholar
- 4.Bernoulli, J.: Ars Conjectandi, Thurnisiores, Basel (1713); Reprinted in Werke von Jakob Bernoulli, vol. 1. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel (1975)Google Scholar
- 5.Brönnimann, D.: Die Entwicklung des Wahrscheinlichkeitsbegriffs von 1654 bis 1718, Diplomarbeit, Seminar für Statistik, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich (2001)Google Scholar
- 6.Choquet, G.: Theory of capacities. Ann. Inst. Fourier 5, 131–295 (1953/1954)Google Scholar
- 7.Cox, D.R., Hinkley, D.V.: Theoretical Statistics. Chapman and Hall, London (1974)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 8.Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann. Math. Statist. 38, 325–339 (1967)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 9.Dempster, A.P.: A generalization of Bayesian inference. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 30, 205–245 (1968)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 10.Efron, B.: R.A. Fisher in the 21st Century: Invited paper presented at the 1996 R. Statistical Science 13(2), 95–122 (1998)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 11.Fine, T.L.: Theories of Probability. Academic, New York (1973)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 12.Fisher, R.A.: Inverse probability. Proc. of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 26, 528–535 (1930); Reprinted in Collected Papers of R.A. Fisher, Bennett, J.H. (ed.) vol. 2, pp. 428–436, University of Adelaide (1972)Google Scholar
- 13.Fisher, R.A.: The concepts of inverse probability and fiducial probability referring to unknown parameters. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A 139, 343–348 (1933)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Fisher, R.A.: The fiducial argument in statistical inference. Annals of Eugenics 6, 391–398 (1935)Google Scholar
- 15.Fisher, R.A.: Statistical methods and scientific induction. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 17, 69–78 (1955)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 16.Fisher, R.A.: Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference, Oliver and Boyd, London (1956); 2nd ed. 1959, reprinted (1967)Google Scholar
- 17.Fraser, D.A.S.: The Structure of Inference. Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. Wiley, New York (1968)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 18.Good, I.J.: Subjective probability as the measure of a non-measurable set. In: Nagel, E., Suppes, P., Tarski, A. (eds.) Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, pp. 319–329. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford (1962)Google Scholar
- 19.Hampel, F.: Fair bets, successful bets, and the foundations of statistics. In: Abstract, Second World Congress of the Bernoulli Society, Uppsala (1990)Google Scholar
- 20.Hampel, F.: Some thoughts about the foundations of statistics. In: Morgenthaler, S., Ronchetti, E., Stahel, W.A. (eds.) New Directions in Statistical Data Analysis and Robustness, pp. 125–137. Birkhäuser, Basel (1993)Google Scholar
- 21.Hampel, F.: On the philosophical foundations of statistics: Bridges to Huber’s work, and recent results. In: Rieder, H. (ed.) Robust Statistics, Data Analysis, and Computer Intensive Methods, in Honor of Peter Huber’s 60th Birthday. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 109, pp. 185–196. Springer, New York (1996)Google Scholar
- 22.Hampel, F.: What can the foundations discussion contribute to data analysis? And what may be some of the future directions in robust methods and data analysis? J. Statist. Planning Infer. 57, 7–19 (1997)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 23.Hampel, F.: How different are frequentist and Bayes solutions near total ignorance? In: Proc. 51th Session of the ISI, Contrib. Papers, Book 2, Istanbul, pp. 25–26 (1997)Google Scholar
- 24.Hampel, F.: On the foundations of statistics: A frequentist approach. In: de Miranda, M.S., Pereira, I. (eds.) Estatística: a diversidade na unidade, pp. 77–97. Edições Salamandra, Lda., Lisboa, Portugal (1998)Google Scholar
- 25.Hampel, F.: Is statistics too difficult? Canad. J. Statist. 26(3), 497–513 (1998)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Hampel, F.: An outline of a unifying statistical theory. In: de Cooman, G., Fine, T.L., Seidenfeld, T. (eds.) Proc. of the 2nd Internat. Symp. on Imprecise Probabilities and their Applications, Cornell University, June 26-29, pp. 205–212. Shaper Publishing, Maastricht (2000)Google Scholar
- 27.Hampel, F.: Why is statistics still not unified? In: Proc. 53rd Session of the ISI, Contrib. Papers, Book 1, Seoul, pp. 73–74 (2001)Google Scholar
- 28.Huber, P.J.: The use of Choquet capacities in statistics. Bull. Internat. Statist. Inst. 45, 181–188 (1973)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 29.Huber, P.J.: Kapazitäten statt Wahrscheinlichkeiten? Gedanken zur Grundlegung der Statistik. Jber. Deutsch. Math. Verein. 78(2), 81–92 (1976)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 30.Huber, P.J.: Robust Statistics. Wiley, New York (1981)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Huber, P.J., Strassen, V.: Minimax tests and the Neyman–Pearson lemma for capacities. Ann. Statist. 1(2), 251–263 (1973); Corr.: 2, 223–224Google Scholar
- 32.Kolmogoroff, A.: Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. Springer, Berlin (1933)Google Scholar
- 33.Kolmogorov, A.N.: The estimation of the mean and precision of a finite sample of observations. Section 5: Fisher’s fiducial limits and fiducial probability. Bull. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., Math. Ser. 6, 3–32 (1942) (in Russian)Google Scholar
- 34.Koopman, B.O.: The bases of probability. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 46, 763–774 (1940)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 35.Kyburg, H.E.: Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown (1961)Google Scholar
- 36.Lambert, J.H.: Neues Organon, oder Gedanken über die Erforschung und Be- zeichnung des Wahren und dessen Unterscheidung von Irrtum und Schein, Leipzig (1764); Reprinted by Olms of Hildesheim as the first two volumes of LAMBERT’s Philosophische Schriften (1965)Google Scholar
- 37.Morgenstern, C.: Gesammelte Werke. R. Piper & Co., München (1965); Selected translations in: M. Knight, Christian Morgenstern’s Galgenlieder. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles (1963)Google Scholar
- 38.Neyman, J.: Inductive behavior as a basic concept of philosophy of science. Rev. Internat. Statist. Inst. 25, 7–22 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Neyman, J.: Foundations of behavioristic statistics, Foundations of Statistical Inference. In: Godambe, V.P., Sprott, D.A. (eds.) Holt, Rinehart and Winston of Canada, Toronto (1971)Google Scholar
- 40.Pearson, E.S., Wishart, J.: Student’s Collected Papers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1958)Google Scholar
- 41.Pitman, E.J.G.: Statistics and science. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 52, 322–330 (1957)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Rao, C.R.: Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications. Wiley, London (1965) (2nd edition 1973)Google Scholar
- 43.Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 44.Shafer, G.: Non-Additive Probabilities in the Work of Bernoulli and Lambert. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 19(4), 309–370 (1978)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 45.Smith, C.A.B.: Consistency in statistical inference and decision. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 23, 1–37 (1961)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 46.Strassen, V.: Messfehler und Information, Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Geb. 2, 273–305 (1964)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 47.Student: The probable error of a mean. Biometrika 6, 1–25 (1908)Google Scholar
- 48.Tukey, J.W.: A smooth invertibility theorem. Ann. Math. Statist. 29, 581–584 (1958)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 49.Tukey, J.W.: Handouts for the Wald Lectures (1958); Tukey, J.W.: The Collected Works. More Mathematical, vol. VI (1938–1984); Mallows, C.L. (ed.), Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software, ch. 10, Pacific Grove, CA, pp. 119–148 (1990)Google Scholar
- 50.Walley, P.: Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. Chapman and Hall, London (1991)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 51.Zabell, S.L.: R.A. Fisher and the fiducial argument. Statistical Science 7(3), 369–387 (1992)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar