Advertisement

Comparative Analysis Among Different Monitoring Functions in a Bandwidth Renegotiation Scheme for Packet Switched Cellular Networks

  • Hermes Irineu Del Monego
  • Luiz Nacamura Junior
  • Richard Demo Souza
  • Anelise Munaretto Fonseca
  • Marcelo Eduardo Pellenz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4217)

Abstract

In this paper we present a comparison among three different monitoring functions to be used in a dynamic bandwidth renegotiation scheme. These functions aim at detecting the amount of unused resources in the network, which can be allocated to low priority data flows. These applications are not delay-sensitive and can be admitted by the call admission control with a bandwidth smaller than the nominal one. Simulation results comparing the performance of the three monitoring functions are presented, as well as an overhead analysis. Finally, we discuss the performance/complexity trade-off considering the three functions and determine the most viable one.

Keywords

Resource Management QoS in Mobile and Wireless Networks Packet Switched Cellular Networks Bandwidth Renegotiation 

References

  1. 1.
    Del Monego, H.I., Bodanese, E.L., Nacamura Jr, L., Souza, R.D.: A Dynamic Resource Allocation Scheme for Providing QoS in Packet-Switched Cellular Networks. In: Magedanz, T., Karmouch, A., Pierre, S., Venieris, I.S. (eds.) MATA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3744, pp. 117–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Halonen, T., Romero, J., Meleto, J.: GSM, GPRS, and EDGE Performance Evolution Towards 3G/UMTS, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liang, X., Xuemin, S., Mark, J.W.: Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation With Fair Scheduling for Wcdma Systems. IEEE Personal Communications 9(2), 26–32 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    3GPP TS 23.107.: UMTS Universal Mobile Telecommunications System. Quality of Service 5.7.0, 1–41 (2003), http://www.etsi.org
  5. 5.
    Kochem, A.C.B., Bodanese, E.L.: A quality of service management scheme over GPRS. In: IEEE SoutheastCon, 74–80 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Levine, D.M., Berenson, M.L., Stephan, D.: Statistics for Managers using Microsoft Excel, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    NS-2.: Documentation. UC Berkeley (2004), http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/ns-documentation.html
  8. 8.
    Trace.: Trace Files (2004), http://trace.eas.asu.edu/TRACE/ltvt.htm
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Oliveira, C., Kim, J.B., Suda, T.: An adaptive bandwidth reservation scheme for high speed multimedia wireless networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 16(6), 858–874 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Staehle D., et al.: Source Traffic Modeling of Wireless Applications(2005), www3.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/TR/tr261.pdf
  12. 12.
    IEEE 802.20.: Traffic Model for MBWA System Simulations (2003), http://www.ieee.org
  13. 13.
    Pang, Q., Bigloo, A., Leung, V.C.M., et al.: Service Scheduling for General Packet Radio Service Classes. IEEE WNC 3, 1229–1233 (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Staehle, D., et al.: QoS of Internet Access with GPRS. Research Report (2002), http://www3.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/TR/tr283.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hermes Irineu Del Monego
    • 1
  • Luiz Nacamura Junior
    • 1
  • Richard Demo Souza
    • 1
  • Anelise Munaretto Fonseca
    • 1
  • Marcelo Eduardo Pellenz
    • 2
  1. 1.LASD – CPGEI – UTFPRCuritibaBrazil
  2. 2.PPGIA – PUC-PRCuritibaBrazil

Personalised recommendations