Scheme for Improving Transmission Performance of Realtime Traffic in Handover Between HMIPv6 Intermap Domains

  • Wongil Park
  • Jonghyoun Choi
  • Byunggi Kim
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4217)


Many studies have been performed to improve the efficiency of mobile IP. Hierarchical MIPv6 (HMIPv6) was proposed due to the lack of MIPv6. The new protocol, that is, Mobility Anchor Point (MAP) receives all packets in place of Mobile Node (MN) and MAP services are transferred to Care of Address (CoA) of MN . However, it can affect the whole network owing to concentration phase of registration occurred in hierarchical MAP structure. We propose the scheme that selects different MAP according to the traffic characteristic. The quantitative  result and performance analysis presented in this paper show that our proposal can reduce the cost of location update by 5% and total cost of MN that moves frequently by 34%.


Mobile Node Home Agent Correspondent Node Mobile IPv6 Mobility Anchor Point 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Johnson, D., Perkins, C., Arrko, J.: Mobility support in IPv6 Internet Draft, IETF, draft-ietf-mobileip-ipv6-20.txt(work in progress) (January 2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xie, J., Akyildiz, F.: A novel distributed dynamic location management scheme for minimizing signaling costs in Mobile IP. IEEE Trans. on Mobile Computing 1(3), 163–175 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Soliman, H., Castelluccia, C., Malki, K.E., Bellier, L.: Hierarchical MIPv6 (HMIPv6) mobility management, Internet Draft (November 2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pack, S., Lee, B., Choi, Y.: Load Control Scheme at Local Mobility Agent in Mobile IPv6 Networks. In: Pack, S., Lee, B., Choi, Y. (eds.) WWC 2004 (May 2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deering, S., Hinden, B.: Internet Protocol version6 (IPv6) specification, IETF, RFC2460 (December 1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reinbold, P., Bonaventure, O.: A Comparison of IP Mobility Protocol, Tech. Rep. Infonet-TR-2001-07, University of Namur, Infonet Group (June 2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jamalipour, A.: The Wireless Mobile Internet. Wiley, Chichester (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ho, J.S.M., Akyildiz, I.F.: Mobile user location update and paging under delay constrainsts. ACM-Baltzer J. Wireless Networks 1, 413–425 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Akyildiz, I.F., Wang, W.: A dynamic location management scheme for next-generation multitier PCS systems. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 1(1), 178–189 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pack, S., Choi, Y.: A Study on performance of hierarchical mobile IPv6 in IP-based cellular networks. IEICE Transactions on Communications E87-B(3), 462–469 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Woo, M.: Performance analysis of mobile IP regional registration. IEICE Trans. Commun. E86-B(2), 472–478 (2003)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang, X., Castellanos, J.G., Capbell, A.T.: P-MIP: Paging extensions for mobile IP. ACM Mobile Networks and Applications 7(2), 127–141 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wongil Park
    • 1
  • Jonghyoun Choi
    • 1
  • Byunggi Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceSoongsil University 

Personalised recommendations