Depth Perception – A Major Issue in Medical AR: Evaluation Study by Twenty Surgeons
The idea of in-situ visualization for surgical procedures has been widely discussed in the community [1,2,3,4]. While the tracking technology offers nowadays a sufficient accuracy and visualization devices have been developed that fit seamlessly into the operational workflow [1,3], one crucial problem remains, which has been discussed already in the first paper on medical augmented reality . Even though the data is presented at the correct place, the physician often perceives the spatial position of the visualization to be closer or further because of virtual/real overlay.
This paper describes and evaluates novel visualization techniques that are designed to overcome misleading depth perception of trivially superimposed virtual images on the real view. We have invited 20 surgeons to evaluate seven different visualization techniques using a head mounted display (HMD). The evaluation has been divided into two parts. In the first part, the depth perception of each kind of visualization is evaluated quantitatively. In the second part, the visualizations are evaluated qualitatively in regard to user friendliness and intuitiveness. This evaluation with a relevant number of surgeons using a state-of-the-art system is meant to guide future research and development on medical augmented reality.
KeywordsAugmented Reality Volume Rendering Depth Perception Virtual Image Triangle Mesh
- 5.Sauer, F., Khamene, A., Bascle, B., Vogt, S., Rubinob, G.J.: Augmented reality visualization in imri operating room: System description and pre-clinical testing. In: Proceedings of SPIE, Medical Imaging, vol. 4681, pp. 446–454 (2002)Google Scholar
- 6.King, A., Edwards, P., Maurer, et al.: Stereo augmented reality in the surgical microscope. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual. Env. 9, 360–368 (2000)Google Scholar
- 7.Johnson, L.G., Edwards, P., Hawkes, D.: Surface transparency makes stereo overlays unpredictable: The implications for augmented reality. In: Medicine Meets Virtual Reality (MMVR), pp. 131–136. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
- 8.Cutting, J.E., Vishton, P.M.: Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In: Epstein, W., Rogers, S. (eds.) Perception of Space and Motion, pp. 69–117 (1995)Google Scholar
- 9.Hastreiter, P., Rezk-Salama, C., Tomandl, B., Eberhardt, K.E.W., Ertl, T.: Fast analysis of intracranial aneurysms based on interactive direct volume rendering and CTA. In: Wells, W.M., Colchester, A.C.F., Delp, S.L. (eds.) MICCAI 1998. LNCS, vol. 1496, pp. 660–669. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)Google Scholar