“I Keep Collecting”: College Students Build and Utilize Collections in Spite of Breakdowns

  • Eunyee Koh
  • Andruid Kerne
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4172)


As people become more and more involved with digital information, they grow proportionally involved in situated practices of collecting. They put together large sets of information elements. However, their attention to those information elements is limited. They use whatever means are at hand in order to form representations of their collections. They need to keep track of the elements in these collections, so they can use them later. We conducted a study with 20 college students. A major concern for the students during collection building was collection management and utilization, particularly as the size and number of their collections grows. They experienced breakdowns in these processes, yet continued to engage in collecting. They developed strategies such as informal metadata schemas and hierarchical organization to try to cope with their problems. We consider the practices observed, and their implications for the development of tools to support digital collection building and utilization. Collection representations that support cognition, collaboration, and semantic schemas are prescribed.


Collection Tool Information Element Human Attention Collection Representation Digital Collection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Abrams, D., Baecker, R., Chignell, M.: Information archiving with bookmarks: personal Web space construction and organization. In: Proc. SIGCHI, April 18-23, pp. 41–48 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baddeley, A.D.: Is working memory working? Quarterly Journal of Exp Psych 44A, 1–31 (1992)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bälter, O.: Strategies for Organizing Email. In: Proc. of HCI on People and Computers, vol. XII, pp. 21–38 (January 1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barreau, D.: Context as a factor in personal information management systems. JASIS 46(5), 327–339 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barreau, D., Nardi, B.: Finding and reminding: file organization from the desktop. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 27(3), 39–43 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Billsus, D., Hilbert, D., Maynes-Aminzade, D.: Improving Proactive Information Systems. In: Proc. IUI 2005, January 9, pp. 159–166 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boardman, R., Sasse, M.A.: Stuff goes into the computer and doesn’t come out: a crosstool study of personal information management. In: Proc. SIGCHI 2004, pp. 583–590 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carney, R.M., Levin, J.R.: Pictorial Illustrations Still Improve Students’ Learning From Text. Educational Psychology Review 14(1) (March 2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davis, M., King, S., Good, N., Sarvas, R.: From context to content: leveraging context to infer media metadata. ACM Multimedia, 188–195 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Glenberg, A.M., Langston, W.E.: Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory & Language 31(2), 129–151 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hawkey, K., Inkpen, K.M.: Privacy gradients: exploring ways to manage incidental information during co-located collaboration. In: Proc. CHI 2005, pp. 1431–1434 (April 2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones, W., Dumais, S., Bruce, H.: Once found, what then?: a study of ”keeping” behaviors in personal use of Web information. In: Proc. ASIST 2002, November 18-21, pp. 391–402 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malone, T.: How do people organize their desks?: Implications for the design of office information systems. TOIS 1(1), 99–112 (1983)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pew Internet & American Life Project, Internet: The Mainstreaming of Online Life (2005),
  15. 15.
    Pew Internet & American Life Project, The Internet Goes to College (2002),
  16. 16.
    Pew Internet & American Life Project, Content Creation Online,
  17. 17.
    Schachter, J.:
  18. 18.
    Shipman, F., Marshall, C.: Formality Considered Harmful: Experiences, Emerging Themes, and Directions on the Use of Formal Representations in Interactive Systems. In: Proc. CSCW 1999, pp. 333–352 (1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Simon, H.: Computers, Communications and the Public Interest. In: Greenberger, M. (ed.), pp. 40–41. The Johns Hopkins Press, Boltimore (1971)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Suchman, L.: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Whittaker, S., Sidner, C.: Email overload: exploring personal information management of email. In: Proc. SIGCHI, April 13-18, pp. 276–283 (1996)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding Computers and Cognition. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1986)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eunyee Koh
    • 1
  • Andruid Kerne
    • 1
  1. 1.Interface Ecology Lab, Center for Study of Digital Libraries, Computer Science DepartmentTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations