Spatio-temporal Proximities for Multimedia Document Adaptation

  • Sébastien Laborie
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4183)

Abstract

The multiplication of execution contexts for multimedia documents requires the adaptation of the document specification to the particularities of the contexts. In this paper, we propose to apply a semantic approach for multimedia document adaptation to the spatio-temporal dimension of documents. To guarantee that the adapted document is close to the initial one respecting adaptation constraints, we define proximities for adapting static documents (i.e., documents without animations) and animated documents. Moreover, we show that these proximities can be refined according to multimedia object properties (e.g., images, videos...). The approach is illustrated by an example.

Keywords

Knowledge representation and reasoning semantic adaptation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Euzenat, J., Layaïda, N., Dias, V.: A semantic framework for multimedia document adaptation. In: Proc. of IJCAI 2003, pp. 31–36. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Laborie, S., Euzenat, J., Layaïda, N.: Adaptation spatiale efficace de documents SMIL. In: 15e congrès francophone AFRIF-AFIA Reconnaissance des Formes et Intelligence Artificielle (RFIA), Tours (France) (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roisin, C.: Authoring structured multimedia documents. In: Rovan, B. (ed.) SOFSEM 1998. LNCS, vol. 1521, pp. 222–239. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    W3C: Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 2.0) Specification (2001), http://www.w3.org/TR/smil20/
  5. 5.
    Jourdan, M., Layaïda, N., Roisin, C., Sabry-Ismaïl, L., Tardif, L.: Madeus, an authoring environment for interactive multimedia documents. In: 6th ACM Multimedia conference, Bristol, UK, pp. 267–272 (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marriott, K., Moulder, P., Stuckey, P.J., Borning, A.: Solving disjunctive constraints for interactive graphical applications. In: Walsh, T. (ed.) CP 2001. LNCS, vol. 2239, pp. 361–376. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W3C: Composite Capability/Preference Profiles (CC/PP): Structure and Vocabularies (2001), http://www.w3.org/TR/CCPP-struct-vocab/
  8. 8.
    Lemlouma, T., Layaïda, N.: The negotiation of multimedia content services in heterogeneous environments. In: Proc. 8th International Conference on Multimedia Modeling (MMM 2001), Amsterdam (NL), pp. 187–206 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Allen, J.: Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of the ACM 26(11), 832–843 (1983)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Randell, D.A., Cui, Z., Cohn, A.: A spatial logic based on regions and connection. In: Nebel, B., Rich, C., Swartout, W. (eds.) KR 1992 Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Third International Conference, pp. 165–176. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1992)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Freksa, C.: Temporal reasoning based on semi-intervals. Artificial Intelligence 54(1–2), 199–227 (1992)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nebel, B.: Solving hard qualitative temporal reasoning problems: Evaluating the efficiency of using the ORD-horn class. In: European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 38–42 (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ma, J., Knight, B., Petridis, M.: A revised theory of action and time based on intervals and points. The Computer Journal 37(10), 847–857 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sébastien Laborie
    • 1
  1. 1.INRIA Rhône-AlpesSaint IsmierFrance

Personalised recommendations