A Component Plug-In Architecture for the .NET Platform

  • Reinhard Wolfinger
  • Deepak Dhungana
  • Herbert Prähofer
  • Hanspeter Mössenböck
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4228)

Abstract

Plug-in architectures and platforms represent a promising approach for building software systems which are extensible and customizable to the particular needs of the individual user. For example, the Eclipse platform, as the most prominent representative of plug-in systems, is based on a unique plug-in and extensibility concept and has succeeded in establishing itself as the leading platform for the development of tool environments. This paper introduces a new plug-in architecture for the .NET platform which shows much resemblance to Eclipse. However, whereas Eclipse is a Java-based system and uses XML to describe extensions, our architecture relies on .NET concepts such as custom attributes and metadata to specify relevant information directly in the source code of an application. We argue that this approach is more readable and easier to maintain. As a case study for our plug-in architecture we present a new plug-in platform for implementation of rich client applications in .NET.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beck, K., Gamma, E.: Contributing to Eclipse. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cox, B.J.: Planning the software industrial revolution. IEEE Software 7(6) (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crnkovic, I., et al.: Special Issue: Automated Component-based Software Engineering. Journal of Systems and Software 74(1) (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dean, D.: The Security of Static Typing with Dynamic Linking. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Zurich, Switzerland (April 1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dewan, P., Choudhary, R.: Coupling the user interfaces of a multiuser program. ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dhungana, D.: CAP.NET – Client Application Platform in .NET. Master thesis, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eclipse Platform Technical Overview. Object Technology International, Inc. (February 2003), http://www.eclipse.org
  8. 8.
    Ghezzi, C., Monga, M.: Fostering component evolution with C# attributes. In: International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution (IWPSE) (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hall, R.S., Cervantes, H.: An OSGi Implementation and Experience Report. Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Löwy, J.: Programming .NET Components. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McIllroy, M.D.: Mass produced software components. In: Proceedings of the Nato Software Engineering Conference, pp. 138–155 (1968)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Microsoft: Microsoft C# Language Specifications. Microsoft Press, Redmond  (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    mozilla.org: An Introduction To Hacking Mozilla, http://www.mozilla.org/hacking/coding-introduction.html
  14. 14.
    Mössenböck, H., Beer, W., Birngruber, D., Wöß, A.: .NET Application Development. Pearson Addison Wesley, London (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    OSGi Service Platform, Release 3. The Open Services Gateway Initiative (March 2003), http://www.osgi.org
  17. 17.
    Shaver, M., Ang, M.: Inside the Lizard: A Look at the Mozilla Technology and Architecture (2000), http://www.mozilla.org/
  18. 18.
    Stallman, R.: EMACS: The Extensible, Customizable Display Editor. In: ACM Conference on Text Processing (1981)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Syperski, C.: Component Software, Beyond Object-Oriented Programming, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Udell, J.: Component Software. BYTE 19(5), 46–55 (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reinhard Wolfinger
    • 1
  • Deepak Dhungana
    • 1
  • Herbert Prähofer
    • 1
  • Hanspeter Mössenböck
    • 1
  1. 1.Christian Doppler Laboratory for Automated Software EngineeringJohannes Kepler UniversityLinzAustria

Personalised recommendations