A Tool to Facilitate Agent Deliberation

  • Daniel Bryant
  • Paul Krause
  • Sotiris Moschoyiannis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4160)


In this paper we present a prototype of a tool that demonstrates how existing limitations in ensuring an agent’s compliance to an argumentation-based dialogue protocol can be overcome. We also present the implementation of compliance enforcement components for a deliberation dialogue protocol, and an application that enables two human participants to engage in an efficiently moderated dialogue, where all inappropriate utterances attempted by an agent are blocked and prevented from inclusion within the dialogue.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Guilfoyle, C., Jeffcoate, J., Stark, H.: Agents on the Web: Catalyst for E-Commerce. Ovun Ltd., London (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Papazoglou, M.P.: Service-Oriented Computing: Concepts, characteristics and directions. In: WISE 2003: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, Washington, DC, USA, p. 3. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Artikis, A., Pitt, J., Sergot, M.: Animated specifications of computational societies. In: AAMAS 2002: Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp. 1053–1061. ACM Press, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amgoud, L., Caminada, M., McBurney, P., Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.: Final Review and Report on Argumentation System. Technical Report ASPIC Deliverable 2.6 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Singh, M.P.: Agent communication languages: Rethinking the principles. IEEE Computer 31(12), 40–47 (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wooldridge, M.: Verifiable Semantics for Agent Communication Languages. In: Demazeau, Y. (ed.) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1998), Paris, France, pp. 349–356. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hitchcock, D., McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: A Framework for Deliberation Dialogues. In: Proc. of 4th Biennial Conf. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OOSA) (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alberti, M., Daolio, D., Torroni, P., Gavanelli, M., Lamma, E., Mello, P.: Specification and verification of agent interaction protocols in a logic-based system. In: SAC 2004: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM symposium on Applied computing, pp. 72–78. ACM Press, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wells, S., Reed, C.: Formal dialectic specification. In: Rahwan, I., Moraïtis, P., Reed, C. (eds.) ArgMAS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3366, pp. 31–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Minsky, N.H., Ungureanu, V.: Law-governed interaction: a coordination and control mechanism for heterogeneous distributed systems. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 9(3), 273–305 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moschoyiannis, S.K.: Specification and Analysis of Component-Based Software in a Concurrent Setting. PhD thesis, University of Surrey (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Bryant
    • 1
  • Paul Krause
    • 1
  • Sotiris Moschoyiannis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ComputingUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations