Guidelines and Usability Principles to Design and Test Shared-Knowledge Awareness for a CSCL Interface

  • María Paula González
  • César A. Collazos
  • Toni Granollers
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4154)


Shared Knowledge Awareness is defined as the consciousness on the shared knowledge that a particular student has when carrying out a collaborative learning activity in a CSCL environment. In fact, an adequate level of Shared Knowedge Awareness can be promoted by including in the interface of this environment some specific features that improve the student perception related to such knowedge. This paper proposes some basic design guidelines that should be taken into account when designing a CSCL interface in order to promote an adecuate user’s behavior with respect to his/her Shared Knowledge Awareness. Besides, a set of usability principles is identified and linked to every suggested guideline to evaluate its quality (in terms of “easiness to use and learnability”) in an actual interface. Two different experiments are included as real-life examples that are analized within the proposed approach.


Shared Knowledge Design Guideline Computer Support Collaborative Learn Computer Support Collaborative Learn Collaborative Learning Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Palfreyman, K.A., Rodden, T.: A protocol for user awareness on the World Wide Web. In: Procs. of CSCW 1996, pp. 130–139. ACM Press, New York (November 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fjuk, A., Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L.: Articulation of actions in distributed collaborative learning. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 9(2), 3–24 (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Collazos, C., Guerrero, L., Pino, J., Ochoa, S.: Introducing Knowledge-Shared Awareness. In: Procs. of IASTED 2002, USA, pp. 13–18 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Preece, J.: Human-computer interaction. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dillenbourg, P.: Some technical implications of the distributed cognition approach on the design of interactive learning environments. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 7(2), 161–180 (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Usability Net: International standards for HCI and usability. (retrieved March 2006), available on:
  7. 7.
    ISO Standards No. 9241-11: Guidance on usability. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO (1998) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press Professional, Boston (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bevan, N., Kirakowsky, J., Maissel, J.: What is Usability. In: Proc. of 4th Intl. HCI (September 1991)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brock, S.A., Steven, L.E.: Handbook of Usability Principles. Center for Learning, Instruction, & Performance Technologies, San Diego State University (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Norman, D.A.: Cognitive engineering. In: Norman, D.A., Draper, S.W. (eds.) User Centred System Design, Hillsdale, Erlbaum, Mahwah, N.J (1986)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Redish, J.: Are we really entering a post-usability era? ACM SIGDOC Asterisk Journal of Computer Documentation 19(1), 18–24 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shneiderman, B.: Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Constantine, L.L., Loockwood, L.A.D.: Software for Use: A Practical guide to the Models and Methods of Usage-Centered Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Quesenbery, W.: Using the 5Es to Understand Users (2006), Available in WQUsability website in:
  16. 16.
    Granollers, T.: MPlu+a. PhD Thesis (2004), avaliable in:
  17. 17.
    Lorés, J., González, M.P., Pascual, A.: Primera Etapa de la Iniciativa UsabAIPO: usabilidad de páginas de inicio de universidades españolas. In: VI Interacción 2005, pp. 217–221 (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Collazos, C., Guerrero, L., Pino, J., Ochoa, S.: A Method for Evaluating Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Processes. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology 19(3/4), 151–161 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Appelt, W., Ruland, R., Gómez Skarmeta, A., Stahl, G.: Synergeia Version 2 User Manual. (2002), available in:
  20. 20.
    Stahl, G.: Groupware Goes to School. In: 8th Workshop on Groupware, Chile, pp. 1–4 (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gutwin, C., Greeberg, S.: The mechanics of collaboration: Developing low cost usability evaluation methods for shared workspaces. In: IEEE 9th International Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET-ICE 2000) (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C.: A Review of Groupware Evaluations. In: Proceedings of 9th IEEE WETICE 2000, Gaithersburg, Maryland (2000)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C.: Groupware walkthrough: adding context to groupware usability evaluation. In: Procs of the SIGCHI 2002, pp. 455–462. ACM Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Georgiakakis, P., Retalis, S.: Demystifying the asynchronous network supported collaborative learning. Journal of Comp. App. in Tech. 25(2/3), 116–127 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fjuk, A., Smordal, O.: The computers incorporated role in work. In: Buch, N.J., et al. (eds.) IS Research in Collaboration with Industry, Aalborg University, pp. 207–221 (1997)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Paula González
    • 1
  • César A. Collazos
    • 1
    • 2
  • Toni Granollers
    • 1
  1. 1.Group GRIHO – Escola Politécnica SuperiorUniversity of LleidaLleidaSpain
  2. 2.Department of SystemsUniversidad del Cauca FIET-Sector TulcanPopayánColombia

Personalised recommendations