Advertisement

Social Visualization Encouraging Participation in Online Communities

  • Lingling Sun
  • Julita Vassileva
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4154)

Abstract

In order to encourage users to participate more actively and bring more contributions to peer-to-peer (p2p) online communities, we propose to create a motivational community visualization based on the social comparison theory. This paper describes the design of static version and a dynamic version of this visualization developed in our lab, explains the advantages and the disadvantages of the static version and the reason why we decided to develop the dynamic version. This paper also gives a detailed evaluation on the dynamic version.

Keywords

participation online communities social visualization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Asch, S.E.: Effects of Group Pressure upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments. In: Groups, Leadership, and Men, pp. 177–190 (1951)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., King, I.-F., Angel, S.: A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Constructions. Oxford University Press, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bretzke, H., Vassileva, J.: Motivating Cooperation on Peer to Peer Networks. In: Brusilovsky, P., Corbett, A.T., de Rosis, F. (eds.) UM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2702, pp. 218–227. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cosley, D., Lam, S.K., Albert, I., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.: Is Seeing Believing? How Recommender Interfaces Affect Users’ Opinions. In: CHI 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA, April 5 – 10 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eick, S.G., Wills, G.J.: Navigating Large Networks with Hierarchies. In: IEEE Visualization 1993 Conference, pp. 204–210 (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Erickson, T.: Designing Visualizations of Social Activity: Six Claims. In: ACM CHI Proceedings, Ft. Lauderdale Florida, USA, April 5 – 10 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erickson, T., Huang, W., Danis, C., Kellogg, W.A.: A Social Proxy for Distributed Tasks: Design and Evaluation of a Working Prototype. In: ACM Proceedings CHI 2004, Vienna, Austria, April 24-29 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Erickson, T., Kellogg, W.A.: Social Translucence: Using Minimalist Visualizations of Social Activity to Support Collective Interaction. In: Hook, K., Benyon, D., Munroe, A. (eds.) Designing Information Spaces: The Social Navigation Approach, pp. 17–41. Springer, London (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Festinger, L.: A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations 7, 117–140 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Humphrey, M.C.: Creating Reusable Visualizations with the Relational Visualization Notation. In: 11th IEEE Visualization 2000 Conference (VIS 2000), Salt Lake City, UT, October 08 – 13 (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lamme, V.A.F.: Why Visual Attention and Awareness are Different. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 7(1) (January 2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    LimeWire. The Gnutella Protocol Specification v0.4 – Document Revision 1.2.: http://www9.limewire.com/developer/gnutella_protocol_0.4.pdf
  14. 14.
    MetaMachine. eDonkey, and Overnet (2000), http://www.edonkey2000.com/
  15. 15.
    Pattison, T., Vernik, R., Phillips, M.: Information Visualization Using Composable Layouts and Visual Sets. In: Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, Commonwealth of Australia, vol. 9 (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Sharman Networks Ltd. KaZaA, Media Desktop (2001), http://www.kazaa.com/
  18. 18.
    Shepherd, M.M., Briggs, R.O., Reinig, B.A., Yen, J., Nunamaker Jr., J.F.: Invoking Social Comparison to Improve Electronic Brainstorming: Beyond Anonymity. Journal of MIS 12(3), 155–170 (1996)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sprenger, T.C., Brunella, R., Gross, M.H.: H-BLOB: A Hierarchical Visual Clustering Method Using Implicit Surfaces. In: 11th IEEE Visualization 2000 Conference (VIS 2000), Salt Lake City, UT, October 08–13 (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Uther, J., Kay, J.: VlUM, a Web-Based Visualization of Large User Models. In: Brusilovsky, P., Corbett, A.T., de Rosis, F. (eds.) UM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2702, pp. 198–202. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vassileva, J.: Motivating Participation in Peer to Peer Communities. In: Petta, P., Tolksdorf, R., Zambonelli, F. (eds.) ESAW 2002. LNCS, vol. 2577, pp. 141–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2003), available on line at: http://www.ai.univie.ac.at/%7Epaolo/conf/esaw02/preproc/E0029.pdf CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Viegas, F.B., Donath, J.S.: Chat Circles. In: Proceedings of the SIG CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lingling Sun
    • 1
  • Julita Vassileva
    • 2
  1. 1.Solutions AB TELUS Business TransformationEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of SaskatchewanCanada

Personalised recommendations