Fish’n’Steps: Encouraging Physical Activity with an Interactive Computer Game

  • James J. Lin
  • Lena Mamykina
  • Silvia Lindtner
  • Gregory Delajoux
  • Henry B. Strub
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4206)

Abstract

A sedentary lifestyle is a contributing factor to chronic diseases, and it is often correlated with obesity. To promote an increase in physical activity, we created a social computer game, Fish’n’Steps, which links a player’s daily foot step count to the growth and activity of an animated virtual character, a fish in a fish tank. As further encouragement, some of the players’ fish tanks included other players’ fish, thereby creating an environment of both cooperation and competition. In a fourteen-week study with nineteen participants, the game served as a catalyst for promoting exercise and for improving game players’ attitudes towards physical activity. Furthermore, although most player’s enthusiasm in the game decreased after the game’s first two weeks, analyzing the results using Prochaska’s Transtheoretical Model of Behavioral Change suggests that individuals had, by that time, established new routines that led to healthier patterns of physical activity in their daily lives. Lessons learned from this study underscore the value of such games to encourage rather than provide negative reinforcement, especially when individuals are not meeting their own expectations, to foster long-term behavioral change.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Orzano, A.J., Scott, J.G.: Diagnosis and Treatment of Obesity in Adults: An Applied Evidence-Based Review. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 17, 359–369 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Purnell, J.Q., Knopp, R.H., Brunzell, J.D.: Diatary fat and obesity. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 70–108 (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bacon, L., Keim, N.L., Van Loan, M.D., Derricte, M., Gale, B., Kazaks, A., Stern, J.S.: Evaluating a non-diet wellness intervention for improvement of metabolic fitness, psychological well-being and eating and activity behaviors. International Journal of Obesity 26, 854–865 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bissell, P.: Compliance, Concordance and Respect for the Patient’s Agenda. The Pharmaceutical Journal 271, 498–500 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tudor-Locke, C.E., Myers, A.M., Bell, R.C., Harris, S.B., Rodger, N.W.: Preliminary Outcome Evaluation of the First Step Program: a daily physical activity intervention for individuals with type 2 diabetes. Patient Education and Counseling 47, 23–28 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grimley, D., Prochaska, J.O., Velicer, W.F., Vlais, L.M., DiClemente, C.C.: The transtheoretical model of change. In: Brinthaupt, T.M., Lipka, R.P. (eds.) Changing the self: Philosophies, techniques, and experiences. SUNY series, studying the self, pp. 201–227. State University of New York Press, Albany (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist 37(2), 122–147 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    DiClemente, C.C., Prochaska, J.O., Fairhurst, S.K., Veliceer, W.F., Velasquez, M.M., Rossi, J.S.: The process of smoking cessation: An analysis of precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 59, 295–304 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dallow, C.B., Anderson, J.: Using self-efficacy and a transtheoretical model to develop a physical activity intervention for obese women. American Journal of Health Promotion 17, 373–381 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marshall, S., Biddle, S.: The transtheoretical model of behavior change: A meta-analysis of applications to physical activity and exercise. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 23, 229–246 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Riebe, D., Blissmer, B., Greene, G., Caldwell, M., Ruggiero, L., Stillwell, K., Nigg, C.: Long-term maintenance of exercise and healthy eating behaviors in overweight adults. Preventive Medicine 40, 769–778 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lieberman, D.: Dance Dance Revolution: The Most Researched Serious Game Ever. Why, and What Have We Learned? Serious Games Summit DC 2005 Sessions (2005), https://www.cmpevents.com/GDsg05/a.asp?option=C&V=11&SessID=1075
  13. 13.
    Mokka, S., Väätänen, A., Heinilä, J., Välkkynen, P.: Fitness computer game with a bodily user interface. In: Proc ICEC 2003, pp. 1–3 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Björk, S., Holopainen, J., Ljungstrand, P., Akesson, K.P.: Designing Ubiquitous Computing Games – A Report from a Workshop Exploring Ubiquitous Computing Entertainment. In: Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 443–458 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chan, C., Ryan, D., Tudor-Locke, C.: Health benefits of a pedometer-based physical activity intervention in sedentary workers. Preventive Medicine 39, 1215–1222 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Consolvo, S., Everitt, K., Smith, I., Landay, J.A.: Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, pp. 457–466 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hardeman, W., Griffin, S., Johnston, M., Kinmonth, A.L., Wareham., N.J.: Interventions to prevent weight gain: A systematic review of psychological models and behaviour change methods. International Journal of Obesity 24, 131–143 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Langer, E.J., Rodin, J.: The Effects of Choice and Enhanced Personal Responsibility for the Aged: A Field Experiment in an Institutional Setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34, 191–198 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lieberman, D.: Interactive Video Games for Health Promotion: Effects on Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, Social Support, and Health, Health Promotion and Interactive Technol-ogy: Theoretical Applications and Future Directions. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1997)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McLean, N., Griffin, S., Toney, K., Hardeman, W.: Family involvement in weight control, weight maintenance and weight-loss interventions: A systematic review of randomized trials. International Journal of Obesity 27, 987–1005 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Intille, S.S.: Ubiquitous Computing Technology for Just-in-Time Motivation of Behavior Change (Position Paper). In: Proceedings of the UbiHealth Workshop (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jafarinaimi, N., Forlizzi, J., Hurst, A., Zimmerman, J.: Breakaway: an ambient display designed to change human behavior. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, OR, USA, April 02 - 07, 2005, pp. 1945–1948 (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2002)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Konkel, M., Leung, V., Ullmer, B., Hu, C., Tagaboo,: A collaborative children’s game based upon wearable RFID technology. Pers Ubiquit Comput., 382–384 (2004)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Croteau, K.: A preliminary study on the impact of a pedometer-based intervention on daily steps. American Journal of Health Promotion 18, 217–220 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • James J. Lin
    • 1
  • Lena Mamykina
    • 1
  • Silvia Lindtner
    • 1
  • Gregory Delajoux
    • 1
  • Henry B. Strub
    • 1
  1. 1.Siemens Corporate ResearchPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations