Investigating STDP and LTP in a Spiking Neural Network

  • Daniel Bush
  • Andrew Philippides
  • Phil Husbands
  • Michael O’Shea
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4095)


The idea that synaptic plasticity holds the key to the neural basis of learning and memory is now widely accepted in neuroscience. The precise mechanism of changes in synaptic strength has, however, remained elusive. Neurobiological research has led to the postulation of many models of plasticity, and among the most contemporary are spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) and long-term potentiation (LTP). The STDP model is based on the observation of single, distinct pairs of pre- and post- synaptic spikes, but it is less clear how it evolves dynamically under the input of long trains of spikes, which characterise normal brain activity. This research explores the emergent properties of a spiking artificial neural network which incorporates both STDP and LTP. Previous findings are replicated in most instances, and some interesting additional observations are made. These highlight the profound influence which initial conditions and synaptic input have on the evolution of synaptic weights.


Firing Rate Spike Train Plasticity Model Synaptic Weight Synaptic Strength 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Abraham, W., et al.: Heterosynaptic metaplasticity in the hippocampus in vivo: A BCM-like modifiable threshold for LTP. PNAS 98(19), 10924–10929 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bekkers, J.M., et al.: Origin of variability in quantal size in cultured hippocampal neurons and hippocampal slices. PNAS 87, 5359–5362 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bi, G.-q., Poo, M.-m.: Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: de-pendence on spike timing, synaptic strength and post-synaptic cell type. Journal of Neuroscience 18, 10464–10472 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bienenstock, E., Cooper, L., Munro, P.: Theory for the development of neuron selec-tivity: Orientation specificity and binocular interaction in the visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2, 32–48 (1982)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Di Paolo, E.: Evolving spike-timing-dependent plasticity for single-trial learning in robots. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London 361, 2299–2319 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldenberg, E., Garcowski, J., Beer, R.: May we have your attention: Analysis of a selective attention task. In: Proc. Eighth Int. Conf. Sim. Adap. Behaviour, pp. 49–56 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hebb, D.: The Organisation of Behaviour: A Neuropsychological theory. Wiley, New York (1949)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Iglesias, J., Eriksson, J.L., Pardo, B., Tomassini, M., Villa, A.E.P.: Stimulus-Driven Unsupervised Synaptic Pruning in Large Neural Networks. In: De Gregorio, M., Di Maio, V., Frucci, M., Musio, C. (eds.) BVAI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3704, pp. 59–68. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Izhikevich, E., Desai, N.: Relating STDP to BCM. Letters to Neural Computation 15, 1511–1523 (2003)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Izhikevich, E.: Which model to use for Cortical spiking neurons? IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 15(5), 1063–1070 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Izhikevich, E., Gally, J., Edelman, G.: Spike timing dynamics of neuronal groups. Cerebral Cortex 14, 933–944 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lomo, T., Bliss, T.: Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. Journal Physioogy 232, 331–341 (1973)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malenka, R., Nicoll, R.: Long-term potentiation – A decade of progress? Science 285, 1870–1874 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miller, K.D., McKay, D.J.: The role of constraints in Hebbian learning. Neural Computation 6, 100–126 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miller, K.D.: Synaptic economics: competition and co-operation in synaptic plasticity. Neuron 17, 371–374 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roberts, P., Bell, C.: Spike timing dependent plasticity in biological systems. Biological Cybernetics 87, 392–403 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Song, S., Miller, K., Abbott, L.F.: Competitive Hebbian learning through spike timing dependent synaptic plasticity. Nature Neuroscience 3, 919–926 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van Rossum, M.C.W., Bi, G.Q., Turrigiano, G.G.: Stable Hebbian learning from spike timing dependent plasticity. Journal of Neuroscience 20(23), 8812–8821 (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    van Rossum, M.C.W., Turrigiano, G.G.: Correlation based learning from spike timing de-pendent plasticity. Neurocomputing 38-40, 409–415 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Bush
    • 1
  • Andrew Philippides
    • 1
  • Phil Husbands
    • 1
  • Michael O’Shea
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Computational Neuroscience and RoboticsUniversity of SussexBrighton

Personalised recommendations