Individual Discrimination Capability and Collective Choice in Social Insects

  • Jesus Millor
  • José Halloy
  • Jean-Marc Amé
  • Jean-Louis Deneubourg
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4150)


In an ant society individuals coming from different groups (lines, strains) bear it own chemical identity and those individuals present discrimination capabilities between different chemical profiles. However, at the collective level these groups may cooperate and act together. To understand this apparent contradiction we have to keep in mind that amplification is the main component of many collective phenomena in social and gregarious insects. We use a model of food recruitment where each group of foragers have its own blend of pheromone trail that is partly recognized by the others groups. We found that a low level of recognition between signals is sufficient to produce a collaborative pattern between groups and that beyond a critical value of recognition. The aggregation of all the groups around the same food source is observed. Such collective response is a generic property of social phenomena governed by amplification processes.


Social Insect Aggregative State Cuticular Hydrocarbon Trail Pheromone Collective Choice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Vander Meer, R.K., Morel, L.: Nestmate recognition in ants. In: Vander Meer, R.K., Breed, M., Winston, M., Espelie, K.E. (eds.) Pheromone Communication in Social Insects, pp. 79–103. Westview Press, Boulder (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breed, M., Diaz, P.H., Lucero, K.D.: Olfactory information processing in honeybee, Apis mellifera, nestmate recognition. Anim. Behav. 68, 921–928 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Estoup, A., Solignac, M., Cornuet, J.M.: Precise assessment of the number of patrillines and of genetic relatedness in the honeybee colonies. P. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 258, 1–7 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arnold, G., Quenet, B., Cornuet, J.M., Masson, C., De Schepper, B., Estoup, A., Gasqui, P.: Kin recognition in honeybees. Nature 379, 498 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rivault, C., Cloarec, A., Sreng, L.: Cuticular extracts inducing aggregation in the German cockroach, Blattella germanica. Anim. Behav. 55, 177–184 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kryger, P., Moritz, R.F.A.: Lack of kin recognition in swarming honeybees (Apis mellifera). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 40, 271–276 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kirchner, W.H., Arnold, G.: Intracolonial kin discrimination in honey bees: do bees dance with their super-sisters. Anim. Behav. 61, 597–600 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heinze, J., Elsishans, C., Hölldobler, B.: No evidence for kin assortment during colony propagation in a polygynous ant. Naturwissenschaften 84, 249–250 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Amé, J.M., Rivault, C., Deneubourg, J.L.: Cockroach aggregation based on strain odour recognition. Anim. Behav. 68, 793–801 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Everaerts, C., Farine, J.P., Brossut, R.: Changes of specific cuticular hydrocarbon profiles in the cockroaches Nauphoeta cinera and Leucophaea maderae reared in heteropsecific groups. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 85, 145–150 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deneubourg, J.L., Goss, S.: Collective patterns and decision making. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 1, 295–311 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Camazine, S., Deneubourg, J.L., Franks, N.R., Sneyd, J., Theraulaz, G., Bonabeau, E.: Self-organization in Biological Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Millor, J., Pham-Delegue, M., Deneubourg, J.L., Camazine, S.: Self-organized defensive behaviour in honeybees. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 12611–12615 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Visscher, P.K., Camazine, S.: Collective decisions and cognition in bees. Nature 397, 400 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lucas, C., Pho, D.B., Fresneau, D., Jallon, J.M.: Hydrocarbon circulation and colonial signature in Pachycondyla villosa. J. Insect. Physiol. 50, 595–607 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lucas, C.: Etudes des bases chimiques et comportementales de la formation du “visa” colonial chez les Ponérines du genre Pachycondyla. Phd University of Paris XI (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Crozier, R.H.: Genetic aspects of kin recognition: concepts, models, and synthesis. In: Fletcher, D.J.C., Michener, C.D. (eds.) Kin Recognition in Animals, pp. 55–73. John Wiley, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lahav, S., Soroker, V., Hefetz, A., Vander Meer, R.K.: Direct behavioral evidence for hydrocarbons as ant recognition discriminators. Naturwissenschaften 86, 246–249 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dahbi, A., Lenoir, A., Tinaut, A., Taghizadeh, T., Francke, W., Hefetz, A.: Chemistry of the postpharyngeal gland secretion and its implication for the phylogeny of Iberian Cataglyphis species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Chemoecology 7, 163–171 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nielsen, J., Boomsma, J.J., Oldham, N.J., Petersen, H.C., Morgan, E.D.: Colony-level and season-specific variation in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of individual workers in the ant Formica truncorum. Insect. Soc. 46, 58–65 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hölldobler, B.: The chemistry of social regulation: multicomponent signals in ant societies. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 19–22 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hölldobler, B., Wilson, E.O.: The Ants. Harvard University Press Cambridge Massachusetts, Cambridge Massachusetts (1990)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Attygalle, A.B., Morgan, E.D.: Ant trail pheromones. Adv. Insect. Physiol. 18, 1–30 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Camazine, S., Sneyd, S.: A model of collective nectar source selection by honeybees: self-organization through simple rules. J. Theor. Biol. 149, 547–571 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Devigne, C., Renon, A.J., Detrain, C.: Out of sight but not out of mind: modulation of recruitment according to home range marking in ants. Anim. Behav. 67, 1023–1029 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jesus Millor
    • 1
  • José Halloy
    • 1
  • Jean-Marc Amé
    • 1
  • Jean-Louis Deneubourg
    • 1
  1. 1.Service d’Ecologie SocialeUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations