Modeling, Matching and Ranking Services Based on Constraint Hardness

  • Claudia d’Amato
  • Steffen Staab
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4103)

Abstract

A framework for modeling Semantic Web Service is proposed. It is based on Description Logic (DL), hence it is endowed with a formal semantics and, in addition, it allows for expressing constraints in service descriptions of different strengths, i.e. Hard and Soft Constraints. Semantic service discovery can be performed by matching DL descriptions, expressing both Hard and Soft constraints, and exploiting DL inferences. Additionally, a method for solving the problem of ranking services is proposed which is based on the use of a semantic similarity measure for DL. This method can rank (matched) service descriptions on the grounds of their semantic similarity w.r.t. the service request, by preferring those that are able to better satisfy both Hard and Soft Constraints.

References

  1. 1.
    Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bock, H.H.: Analysis of Symbolic Data: Exploratory Methods for Extracting Statistical Information from Complex Data. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Calì, A., Calvanese, D., Colucci, S., Di Noia, T., Donini, F.M.: A description logic based approach for matching user profiles. In: Description Logics (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Esposito, F.: A semantic similarity measure for expressive description logics. In: Pettorossi, A. (ed.) Proceedings of Convegno Italiano di Logica Computazionale, CILC 2005, Rome, Italy (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gonzales-Castillo, J., Trastour, D., Bartolini, C.: Description logics for matchmaking of services. In: Proc. of KI 2001 Workshop on Applications of Description Logics, vol. 44 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grimm, S., Motik, B., Preist, C.: Variance in e-business service discovery. In: Proceedings of the ISWC Workshop on Semantic Web Services (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, L., Horrocks, I.: A software framework for matchmaking based on semantic web technology. In: WWW 2003: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 331–339. ACM Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McIlraith, S.A., Martin, D.L.: Bringing semantics to web services. IEEE Intelligent Systems 18(1), 90–93 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Di Noia, T., Di Sciascio, E., Donini, F.M., Mongiello, M.: A system for principled matchmaking in an electronic marketplace. In: WWW, pp. 321–330 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paolucci, M., Kawamura, T., Payne, T.R., Sycara, K.P.: Semantic matching of web services capabilities. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, pp. 333–347. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paolucci, M., Sycara, K.P.: Autonomous semantic web services. IEEE Internet Computing 7(5), 34–41 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Preist, C.: A conceptual architecture for semantic web services. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 395–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Trastour, D., Bartolini, C., Gonzalez-Castillo, J.: A semantic web approach to service description for matchmaking of services. In: SWWS, pp. 447–461 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Trastour, D., Bartolini, C., Preist, C.: Semantic web support for the business-to-business e-commerce lifecycle. In: WWW 2002: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 89–98. ACM Press, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudia d’Amato
    • 1
  • Steffen Staab
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of BariItaly
  2. 2.ISWebUniversity of Koblenz-LandauGermany

Personalised recommendations