Understanding Interdependence in Enterprise Systems: A Model and Measurement Formalism

  • Ronald E. Giachetti
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4103)


Interdependence between the subsystems of an enterprise is one of the driving reasons for integrating the enterprise. Integration attempts to manage those interdependencies so all subsystems work harmoniously together to achieve the enterprise goals. Prior to embarking on an enterprise integration project the interdependencies need to be analyzed. Unfortunately, interdependence between subsystems is still poorly conceptualized. This paper develops a modeling and measurement formalism to analyze interdependence in the enterprise. The model defines interdependence and characterizes the strength of the interdependence through relational measurement theory. The model is supported by empirical findings and illustrated through a case study. Limitations of current conceptualizations of interdependence are discussed and remedies are proposed. The primary contribution is a formal model to define and analyze interdependence in an enterprise, an activity that should occur as part of all enterprise integration projects.


Enterprise Systems modeling measurement 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Harris, M., Raviv, A.: Organization design. Management Science 48, 852–866 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vernadat, F.D.: Enterprise modeling and integration. Chapman and Hall, London (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Simon, H.A.: Complex systems: The interplay of organizations and markets in contemporary society. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 7, 79–85 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sutherland, J., van den Heuval, W.J.: Enterprise application integration and complex adaptive systems. Communications of the ACM 45, 59–64 (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Malone, T.W., Yates, J., Benjamin, R.I.: Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Communications of the ACM 30, 484–497 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rockart, J.F., Short, J.E.: IT in the 1990s: Managing Organizational Interdependence. Sloan Management Review 30, 7–18 (1989)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malone, T.W., Crowston, K.: The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys 26, 87–119 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giachetti, R.: Enterprise Integration: An information integration perspective. International Journal of Production Research 42, 1147–1166 (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brunnermeier, S.B., Martin, S.A.: Interoperability costs in the US automotive supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 7, 71–82 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frohlich, M.T., Westbrook, R.: Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. Journal of Operations Management 19, 185–200 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumar, K., Van Hillesgersberg, J.: ERP: Experiences and evolution. Communications of the ACM 43, 23–26 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sulon, B.: Pennsylvania-based Hersey Foods’ distribution problems to continue. In: Knight-Ridder/Tribune Business News (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Osterland, A.: Blaming ERP, CFO Magazine (January 2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Albino, V., Pontrandolfo, P., Scozzi, B.: Analysis of information flows to enhance the coordination of production processes. International Journal of Production Economics 75, 7–19 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van de Ven, A., Delbecq, A.L., Koenig, R.: Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review 41, 32–338 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fayol, H.: General and Industrial Management. Pitman, London (1949)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thompson, J.D.: Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    McCann, J.E., Ferry, D.L.: An approach to assessing and managing inter-unit interdependence. Academy of Management Review 4, 113–119 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Victor, B., Blackburn, R.S.: Interdependence: An alternative conceptualization. Academy of Management Review 12, 486–498 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sahin, F., Robinson, E.P.: Flow coordination and information sharing in supply chains: Review, implications, and directions for further research. Decision Sciences 33, 505–536 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Crowston, K.: A coordination theory approach to organizational process design. Organizational Science 8, 157–175 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kunz, L.J.: The Virtual Design Team: A Computational Simulation Model of Project Organizations. Simulation 64, 160–174 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wybo, M., Goodhue, D.: Using interdependence as a predictor of data standards: theoretical and measurement issues. Information & Management 29, 317–329 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dean, J.W., Snell, S.A.: Integrated manufacturing and job design: moderating effects of organizational inertia. Academy of Management Journal 34, 776–804 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Scheer, A.W.: Business process engineering. In: Reference models for industrial enterprises, Springer, Berlin (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald E. Giachetti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial & Systems EngineeringFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations