Next Generation Semantic Web Applications

  • Enrico Motta
  • Marta Sabou
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4185)

Abstract

In this short paper, we examine current Semantic Web application and we highlight what we see as a shift away from first generation Semantic Web applications, towards a new generation of applications, designed to exploit the large amounts of heterogeneous semantic markup, which are increasingly becoming available. Our analysis aims both to highlight the main features that can be used to compare and contrast current Semantic Web applications, as well as providing an initial blueprint for characterizing the nature of Semantic Web applications. Indeed, our ultimate goal is to specify a number of criteria, which Semantic Web applications ought to satisfy, if we want to move away from conventional semantic systems and develop a new generation of Semantic Web applications, which can succeed in applying semantic technology to the challenging context provided by the World-Wide-Web.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284(5), 34–43 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee, J., Goodwin, R.: The Semantic Webscape: a View of the Semantic Web. In: WWW 2005: Special interest tracks and posters of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1154–1155. ACM Press, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schraefel, M.C., Shadbolt, N.R., Gibbins, N., Glaser, H., Harris, S.: CS AKTive Space: Representing Computer Science in the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of the 13th International World Wide Web Conference. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hyvönen, E., Mäkelä, E., Salminen, M., Valo, A., Viljanen, K., Saarela, S., Junnila, M., Kettula, S.: MuseumFinland - Finnish Museums on the Semantic Web. Journal of Web Semantics 3(2), 25 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guha, R., McCool, R.: Tap: a semantic web platform. Computer Networks 42(5), 557–577 (2003)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dzbor, M., Motta, E., Domingue, J.B.: Opening Up Magpie via Semantic Services. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 635–649. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Popov, B., Kiryakov, A., Kirilov, A., Manov, D., Ognyanoff, D., Goranov, M.: KIM – A Semantic Annotation Platform. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 834–849. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lopez, V., Motta, E., Uren, V.S.: PowerAqua: Fishing the semantic web. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 393–410. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huynh, D., Mazzocchi, S., Karger, D.: Piggy bank: Experience the semantic web inside your web browser. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 413–430. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Lopez, V., Motta, E.: Ontology-driven question answering in aquaLog. In: Meziane, F., Métais, E. (eds.) NLDB 2004. LNCS, vol. 3136, pp. 89–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schreiber, G., Akkermans, H., Anjewierden, A., de Hoog, R., Shadbolt, N., Van de Velde, W., Wielinga, B.: Knowledge Engineering and Management - The CommonKADS Methodology. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mika, P.: Flink: SemanticWeb Technology for the Extraction and Analysis of Social Networks. Journal of Web Semantics 3(2) (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrico Motta
    • 1
  • Marta Sabou
    • 1
  1. 1.Knowledge Media InstituteThe Open UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations