Argumentation for Decision Support
In this paper we describe an application based on a general approach towards modelling practical reasoning through defeasible argumentation. The purpose of the paper is to show how the incorporation of an argumentation component can add value to a collection of existing information agents. The example application is a system for reasoning about the medical treatment of a patient. An agent, called the Drama agent, orchestrates a number of information sources to supply a set of arguments on the basis of which the decision regarding treatment can be taken. We describe the general approach and its instantiation for this application, and illustrate the operation of the system with a running example.
- 1.Atkinson, K.: What Should We Do?: Computational Representation of Persuasive Argument in Practical Reasoning. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK (2005)Google Scholar
- 4.Doutre, S., Bench-Capon, T., Dunne, P.E.: Explaining preferences with argument position. In: Proceedings of the Ninteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2005), pp. 1560–1561 (2005)Google Scholar
- 6.Perelman, C., Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.: The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (1969)Google Scholar
- 7.Searle, J.R.: Rationality in Action. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
- 8.Tu, S.W., Musen, M.A.: Representation formalisms and computational methods for modeling guideline-based patient care. In: Mussen, M., Stefanelli, M., Heller, B., Loffler, M. (eds.) Proceedings of First European Workshop on Computer-based Support for Clinical Guidelines and Protocols, Leipzig, Germany. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000)Google Scholar
- 9.Walton, D.N.: Argument Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1996)Google Scholar