Ambient Interfaces for Elderly People at Home

  • Fausto J. Sainz Salces
  • Michael Baskett
  • David Llewellyn-Jones
  • David England
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3864)


The elderly population in the world is increasing rapidly and consequently so is demand for new technologies that allow them to live independently. Facilitating the control of household appliances and the home environment through various devices that encompass multimodal and ambient interfaces seems a way to achieve this. In this paper, we lay out the theoretical principles relating to the accommodation of technology for use in the home among older people, followed by a report supporting these principles based on experiments we have carried out. Three modalities of output – audio, visual and multimodal – were tested using two different devices – palmtop and laptop – as realistic prototypes of household appliance controllers. Through experimental design, the applicability of using icons and musical earcons as a medium to transmit information to the user and its suitability to the home was investigated. The use of musical earcons allowed the potential for an ambient interface to be compared with a traditional visual interface for older people. Results showed participants performed markedly better using the multimodal and visual interfaces than with the audio interface. In addition, both groups performed better using the palmtop as compared to the laptop.


Hearing Loss Elderly People Ubiquitous Computing Disable People Assistive Technology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Edwards, W.K., Grinter, R.E.: At home with ubiquitous computing: seven challenges. In: Abowd, G.D., Brumitt, B., Shafer, S. (eds.) UbiComp 2001. LNCS, vol. 2201, pp. 256–272. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jacobson, D.R.: Representing Spatial Information through Multimodal Interfaces. In: Sixth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV 2002), pp. 730–736. IEEE, London (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reeves, L.M.: Guidelines for multimodal user interface design. Communications of the ACM 47, 57–59 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alm, N., Arnott, J.L., Dobinson, L., Massie, P., Hewines, I.: Cognitive prostheses for elderly people, pp. 806–810 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hawthorn, D.: Possible implications of aging for interface designers. Interacting with Computers 12, 507–528 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edwards, W.K.: Enabling technology for users with special needs. IHM-HCI, vol. Tutorial 10, Lille, France, pp. 1–83 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arnold, M., Hopewell, P., Parry, P., Sustache, N., Paddison, C.: User Centred Design - How to Design Accesible Products. In: Maguire, M.A.K. (ed.) European Usability Professionals Association Conference, vol. 3, pp. 22–31. British Computer Society, London (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Statistics, N.: Social and welfare. National Statistics, vol. 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kalache, A., Lunenfeld, B.: Health and the ageing male. World Health Organisation, Geneva (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tinker, A.: Older people in modern society. Longman, London (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jorge, J.: Adaptive Tools for the Elderly New Devices to cope with Age-Induced Cognitive Disabilities. In: WUAUC 2001, vol. 2003 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Whitney, G.: Sensory augmentation system. The use of technology to provide complementary information for people who have a sensory impairment to enable them to travel safely and confortably. vol. 2002. UK Computing Research Committee (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fozard, J.L., Gordon-Salant, S., Scheiber, F., Weiffenbach, J.M.: Sensory and perceptual considerations in designing environments for the elderly. In: AARP (ed.): Life-Span Design for Residential Environments for an Aging Population. vol. 2001. HMRC, Washington, D.C (1993)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    INCLUDE: Inclusion of Disabled and Elderly people in telematics, vol. 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhao, Y., Tyugu, E.: Towards a personalized browser for elderly users. In: Waern, S. (ed.) Workshop on user interfaces for all, towards an accesible Web, Långholmen, Stokolhm (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Motluk, A.: Infinite sensation. New Scientist, 24–28 (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shiffman, H.R.: Sensation and perception. An integrated approach. John Wiley & Sons, INC., New York (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Freeland, A.P.: Deafness: the facts. Oxford U.P., Oxford (1989)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lysons, K.: Understanding hearing loss, Jessica Kingsley (1996)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stevens, J.C., Cruz, L.A.: Spatial acuity of touch: ubiquitous decline with aging revealed by repeated threshold testing. Somatosensory & Motor Research 13, 1–10 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sathian, K., Zangaladze, A., Green, J., Vitek, J.L., DeLong, M.R.: Tactile spatial acuity and roughness discrimination: impairments due to aging and Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 49, 168–177 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sharps, M.J.: Age-related change in visual information processing: toward a unified theory of aging and visual memory. Current Psychology: Developmental Learning Personality Social 16, 284–307 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hawthorn, D.: Cognitive and human computer interface design. In: IEEE (ed.) Australasian Computer Human Interaction Conference, pp. 270–281. IEEE, Adelaide (1998)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brewster, S.A., Wright, P.C., Edwards, A.D.N.: Experimentally derived guidelines for the creation of earcons. In: HCI 1995, Huddersfield (1995)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vickers, P., Alty, J.L.: Towards some organising principles for musical program auralisations. In: ICAD 1998, Glasgow (1998)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dong, H., Keates, S., Clarkson, P.J.: Accomodating older users’ functional capabilities. In: Brewster, S., Zajicek, M. (eds.) HCI BCS 2002, London, pp. 10–11 (2002)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dewsbury, G., Taylor, B., Edge, M.: Designing safe smart home systems for vulnerable people. In: Rouncefield, R.P.a.M. (ed.) Dependability in Healthcare Informatics, Lancaster Unicersity, Edinburg, pp. 65–70 (2001)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hanson, V.L.: Web ACcess for elderly citizens. In: WUAUC 2001, pp. 14–18. ACM, Alcacer do Sal (2001)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dewsbury, G.: The social and psychological aspects of smart home technology within the care sector. New Technology in Human-services 14, 9–17 (2001)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mynatt, E.D., Essa, I., Rogers, W.: Increasing the opportunities for aging in place. In: ACM Proceedings of the 2000 Conference on Universal Usability, pp. 65–71 (2000)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Baldock, J., Hadlow, J.: Housebound Older people: the links between identity, self-esteem and the use of care services. In: ESRC, Growing Older Programme., Sheffield, pp. 1–4 (2002)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Peace, S., Holland, C., Kellaher, L.: Environment and Identity in later Life: a cross-setting study. In: ESRC, Growing Older Programme., Sheffield, pp. 1–4 (2003)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Regnier, V.: Design principles and research issues in housing for the elderly. In: AARP (ed.) Life-Span Design for Residential Environments for an Aging Population, vol. 2001. HMRC, Washington (1993)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Allen, B., Ekberg, J., Willems, C.: Smart houses: how can they help people with disabilities? In: Roe, R.W.P. (ed.) Telecomunications for all, ECSC-EC-EAEC, Brussels (1995)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chan, M., Hariton, C., Ringeard, P.E.C.: Smart house Automation system for the elderly and the disabled (1995)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Monk, A.F., Baxter, G.: Would you trust a computer tu run your home? Dependability issues in smart homes for older adults. In: Brewster, S., Zajicek, M. (eds.) BCS HCI 2002. A new research agenda for older adults, London, pp. 21–22 (2002)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sainz Salces, F.J.: Multimodal human-computer interaction. In: HCI 2002, South Bank University, London (2002)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Barrass, S., Kramer, G.: Using sonification. Multimedia Systems 7, 23–31 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Brewster, S.: Providing a structured method for integrating non-speech audio into human-computer interfaces. vol. 2000 (1994)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Arroyo, E., Selker, T., Stouffs, A.: Interruption as multimodal outputs: which are the less disruptive? In: International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2002)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fraser, J., Gutwin, C.: The Effects of Feedback on Targeting Performance in Visually Stressed Conditions. In: Graphics Interface 2000. Graphics Interface, pp. 19–26 (2000)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hoogeveen, M.: Towards a new multimedia paradigm: is multimedia assisted instruction really effective? vol. 2001 (1995)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Makris, P.: Accessibility of Ubiquitous Computing: Providing for the Elderly. In: Workshop on Universal Accessibility of Ubiquitous Computing: Providing for the Elderly, vol. 2003 (2001)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Savitch, N., Freeman, E., Clarke, L., Zaphiris, P.: Learning from people with dementia to improve accessibility of website interfaces. In: Dearden, A., Watts, L. (eds.) HCI 2004, vol. 2, pp. 185–186. British HCI Group, Leeds (2004)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wilson, C.M., Lodha, S.K.: Listen: a data sonification toolkit. In: ICAD 1996, vol. 2001 (1996)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ng-A-Tham: Equality service accessible for all citizens, in particular elderly and disabled. In: TIDE (1998)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Richter, K., Enge, M.: Multimodal framework to support users with special needs in Interaction with public information systems. In: Chittaro, L. (ed.) The human computer interaction handbook, Oviatt, S. pp. 286–301 (2003)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Venkatesh, A.: Computers and other interactive technologies for the home. Communications of the ACM 39, 47–54 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bien, Z.Z., Park, K., Bang, W., Stefanov, D.H.: An intelligent sweet home for assisting the elderly and the handicapped. In: CWUAAT (2002)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ifukube, T.: A neuroscience-based design of intelligent tools for the elderly and disabled. In: WUAUC 2001. ACM, Alcacer do Sal (2001)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Blackwell, A.F., Hague, R.: AutoHAN: an architecture for programing the home. In: IEEE Symposia on Human-Centric Computing Languages and Environments, pp. 150–157 (2001)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Park, S.H., Won, S.H., Lee, J.B., Kim, S.W.: Smart home – digitally engineered domestic life. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 7, 189–196 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wan, D.: Magig Medicine cabinet:a situated portal fo rconsumer healthcare. In: Gellersen, H.-W. (ed.) HUC 1999. LNCS, vol. 1707, p. 352. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mann, W.C., Ottenbacher, K.J., Fraas, L., Tomita, M., Granger, C.V.: Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental interventions in maintaining independence and reducing home care cost for the frail elderly. Arch. Fam. Med. 8, 210–217 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bonner, S.: Assisted Interactive Dwelling house. In: TIDE, vol. 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Linden, v.d.: Present Practices. In: European Union, vol. 2003 (2001)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    van Berlo, A.: A “Smart” house as research and demonstration tool for telematics development. In: STAKES, vol. 2002 (1998)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Chan, M., Bocquet, H., Campo, E., Pous, J.: Remote Monitoring System to Measure Indoors Mobility and Transfer of the Elderly. In: Technology for Inclusive Design and Equality. TIDE, Helsinki, vol. 2002 (1998)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sainz Salces, F.J., England, D., Llewellyn-Jones, D.: Designing Ambient Home Interfaces for Elderly People. In: Lazkano, E., Sierra, B. (eds.) Workshop on Ambient Intelligence and (Everyday) Life, pp. 205–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kohler, M.: A vision based hand gesture recognition system for controlling appliances in the intelligent house. vol. 2002Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Vallés, M., Manso, F., Arredondo, M.T., Del Pozo, F.: Multimodal envoronmental control system for elderly and disabled people. In: IEEE (ed.): 18th Annual Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Amsterdam (1996)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Chan, M., Bocquet, H., Campo, E., Pous, J.: Remote Monitoring System to Measure Indoors Mobility and Transfer of the Elderly. In: Technology for Inclusive Design and Equality.TIDE., Helsinki (1998)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Bühler, C., Clemens, D., Heck, H., Wallbruch, R.: The KommAS Communication Aid for the Elderly people with aphasia. In: TIDE, Helsinki, Finland (1998)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    CNN: Panasonic banks on digital for the elderly. CNN (11/03/2002) (2002)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Czaja, S., Clark, C., Weber, R., Nachbar, D.: Computer communications among older adults. In: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (ed.): Proceedings of the Human factors and ergonomics society, 34th Annual Meeting, pp. 146–148 (1990)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Brownsell, S., Williams, G., Bradley, D.A.: Information strategies in achieving an integrated home care environment. In: IEEE (ed.): Serving Humanity, Advancind technology, Atlanta, p. 1224 (1999)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Shao, J., Tazine, N., Lamel, L., Prouts, B., Shröter, S.: An open system architecture for a multimedia and multimodal user interface. vol. 2002Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lines, L.: Designing spoken dialogue for intelligent home system. In: Vanderdonckt, J., Derycke, A.B.A. (eds.) IHM-HCI 2001, Interaction without frontiers- Interaction sans fontièrs, Cèpaduès-Editions, Lille, France, vol. II, pp. 187–188 (2001)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Zajicek, M., Morrisey, W.: Spoken message length for older adults. In: INTERACT, The Speech Project, Tokyo, Japan (2001)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Morrissey, W., Zajicek, M.: Can sound output enhance graphical computer interfaces? In: Hanson, M. (ed.) Contemporary Ergonomics. Taylor and Francis, London (2000)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Jedamzik, M.: Smart House. A usable dialog system for the control of technical system by gesture recognition in home environments. Technical Possibilities, State of the Art in Technique and Research, vol. 2003 (1995)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Keates, S., Clarckson, P.J., Robinson, P.: Developing a practical inclusive interface design approach. Interacting with computers 14, 271–299 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Sainz Salces, F.J., England, D., Vickers, P.: Household appliances control device for the elderly. In: Brazil, E., Shinn-Cunningham, B. (eds.) ICAD, pp. 224–227. Boston University Publications, Boston (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fausto J. Sainz Salces
    • 1
  • Michael Baskett
    • 1
  • David Llewellyn-Jones
    • 1
  • David England
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computing & Mathematical SciencesLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations