Tracking Point-Curve Critical Distances

  • Xianming Chen
  • Elaine Cohen
  • Richard F. Riesenfeld
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4077)

Abstract

This paper presents a novel approach to continuously and robustly tracking critical (geometrically, perpendicular and/or extremal) distances from a moving plane point \(p \in \mathbb R^2\) to a static parametrized piecewise rational curve γ(s) (\(s \in \mathbb R\)). The approach is a combination of local marching, and the detection and computation of global topological change, both based on the differential properties of a constructed implicit surface. Unlike many techniques, it does not use any global search strategy except at initialization.

Implementing the mathematical idea from singularity community, we encode the critical distance surface as an implicit surface \(\mathcal{I}\) in the augmented parameter space. A point ps = (p,s) is in the augmented parametric space \(\mathbb R^3 = \mathbb R^2 \times \mathbb R\), where p varies over \(\mathbb R^2\). In most situations, when p is perturbed, its corresponding critical distances can be evolved without structural change by marching along a sectional curve on \(\mathcal{I}\). However, occasionally, when the perturbation crosses the evolute of γ, there is a transition event at which a pair of p’s current critical distances is annihilated, or a new pair is created and added to the set of p’s critical distances. To safely eliminate any global search for critical distances, we develop robust and efficient algorithm to perform the detection and computation of transition events.

Additional transition events caused by various curve discontinuities are also investigated. Our implementation assumes a B-spline representation for the curve and has interactive speed even on a lower end laptop computer.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arnold, V.: Catastrophe Theory, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blum, H.: A transformation for extracting new descriptors of shape. In: Models for the perception of speech and visual forms, pp. 362–380. MIT Press, Cambridge (1967)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, X.: Dynamic Geometric Computation by Singularity Detection and Shape Analysis, Ph.D. Thesis Manuscript (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, X., Riesenfeld, R., Cohen, E.: Degree Reduction Strategies for NURBS Symbolic Computation. In: SMI 2006 (to appear, 2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, X., Riesenfeld, R., Cohen, E.: Extended Curve Evolute as the Transition Set of Distance Functions (under submission, 2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chou, J.J.: Voronoi diagrams for planar shapes. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 15(2), 52–59 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elber, G.: Free Form Surface Analysis using a Hybrid of Symbolic and Numeric Computation, Ph.D. thesis, University of Utah, Computer Science Department (1992)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elber, G., Kim, M.-S.: Geometric constraint solver using multivariate rational spline functions. In: Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications, pp. 1–10 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gregory, A., Lin, M.C., Gottschalk, S., Taylor, R.: A Framework for Fast and Accurate Collision Detection for Haptic Interaction. In: IEEE VR 1999 (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thompson, T.V., Cohen, I.E.: Direct Haptic Rendering Of Complex Trimmed NURBS Models. In: ASME Proc. 8th Annual Symp. on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (November 1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnson, D., Cohen, E.: A framework for efficient minimum distance computations. In: Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. Robotics and Automation, May 1998, pp. 3678–3684 (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnson, D., Cohen, E.: Bound Coherence for Minimum Distance Computations. In: IEEE Proc. International Conference on Robotics and Automation (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johnson, D.E., Willemsen, P., Cohen, E.: A Haptic System for Virtual Prototyping of Polygonal Models. In: DETC 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bruce, J.W., Giblin, P.J.: Curves And Singularities, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koenderink, J.J.: Solid Shape. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Koparlar, P., Mudur, S.P.: A new class of algorithms for the processing of parametric curves. Computer-Aided Design 15, 41–45 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lane, J.M., Riesenfeld, R.F.: A theorectical development for the computer generation and display of piecewise polynomial surfaces. IEEE Trans. PAMI 2, 35–46 (1980)MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lin, M.C.: Efficient Collision Detection for Animation and Robotics, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley (1993)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lin, M.C., Manocha, D.: Collision and proximity queries. In: Handbook of discrete and computational geometry, pp. 787–807 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McNeely, W.A., Puterbaugh, K.D., Troy, J.J.: Six Degree-of-Freedom Haptic Rendering Using Voxel Sampling. In: SIGGRAPH 1999, pp. 401–408 (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nelson, D.D., Johnson, D., Cohen, E.: Haptic Rendering of Surface-to-Surface Sculpted Model Interaction. In: ASME Proc. 8th Annual Symp. on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (November 1999)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Porteous, I.R.: Geometric Differentiation: For the Intelligence of Curves and Surfaces, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saunders, P.T.: An Introduction to Catastrophe Theory, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1980)MATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sederberg, T.W., Nishita, T.: Curve intersection using Bézier clipping. Computer-Aided Design 22, 538–549 (1990)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sederberg, T.W., Parry, S.R.: A comparison of curve-curve intersection algorithms. Computer-Aided Design 18, 58–63 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sherbrooke, E.C., Patrikalakis, N.M.: Computation of the solutions of nonlinear polynomial systems. Computer Aided Geometric Design 10(5), 379–405 (1993)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shirley, P., Morley, R.K.: Realistic Ray Tracing, 2nd edn. A K Peters Ltd. (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xianming Chen
    • 1
  • Elaine Cohen
    • 1
  • Richard F. Riesenfeld
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ComputingUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations