A Photographic Composition Assistant for Intelligent Virtual 3D Camera Systems

  • William Bares
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4073)

Abstract

A human photographer can frame an image and enhance its composition by visualizing how elements in the frame could be better sized or positioned. The photographer resizes elements in the frame by changing the zoom lens or by varying his or her distance to the subject. The photographer moves elements by panning. An intelligent virtual photographer can apply a similar process. Given an initial 3D camera view, a user or application specifies high-level composition goals such as Rule of Thirds or balance. Each objective defines either a One-D interval for image scaling or a Two-D interval for translation. Two-D projections of objects are translated and scaled in the frame according to computed optima. These Two-D scales and translates are mapped to matching changes in the 3D field of view (zoom), dolly-in or out varying subject distance, and rotating the aim direction to improve the composition.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Banerjee, S., Evans, B.L.: Unsupervised Automation of Photographic Composition Rules in Digital Still Cameras. In: Proc. IS&T/SPIE Conf. on Sensors, Color, Cameras, and Systems for Digital Photography, San Jose, CA, January 18–22, vol. 5301, pp. 364–373 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bares, W., McDermott, S., Boudreaux, C., Thainimit, S.: Virtual 3D Camera Composition from Frame Constraints. In: ACM Multimedia, Los Angeles, California, October 30–November 4, pp. 177–186 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blinn, J.: Where am I? what am I looking at? IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 76–81 (1988)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Christie, M., Normand, J.-M.: A Semantic Space Partitioning Approach to Virtual Camera Control. In: Proceedings of the Annual Eurographics Conference, Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 24(3), pp. 247–256 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christie, M., Languénou, E., Granvilliers, L.: Modelling camera control with constrained hypertubes. In: Van Hentenryck, P. (ed.) CP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2470, pp. 618–632. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Courty, N., Marchand, E.: Computer animation: A new application for image-based visual servoing. In: Proceedings of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2001, vol. 1, pp. 223–228 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drucker, S.M., Zeltzer, D.: Intelligent camera control for virtual environments. In: Graphics Interface 1994, pp. 190–200. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gleicher, M., Witkin, A.: Through-the-lens camera control. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 1992, pp. 331–340 (1992)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gooch, B., Reinhard, E., Moulding, C., Shirley, P.: Artistic Composition for Image Creation. In: Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, pp. 83–88 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Halper, N., Helbing, R., Strothotte, T.: A camera engine for computer games: Managing the trade-off between constraint satisfaction and frame coherence. In: Proceedings of the Eurographics 2001 Conference, vol. 20, pp. 174–183 (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Halper, N., Olivier, P.: CAMPLAN: A Camera Planning Agent. In: Smart Graphics. Papers from the 2000 AAAI Spring Symposium, Stanford, March 20-22, pp. 92–100. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jardillier, F., Languénou, E.: Screen-space constraints for camera movements: The virtual cameraman. In: Eurographics 1998. Computer Graphics, vol. 17, pp. 174–186 (1998) (special issue)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    He, L.-w., Cohen, M.F., Salesin, D.H.: The virtual cinematographer: A paradigm for automatic realtime camera control and directing. Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1996), 217–224 (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Brien, M., Sibley, N.: The Photographic Eye: Learning to See with a Camera. Davis Publications, Inc., Worchester (1995)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Olivier, P., Halper, N., Pickering, J., Luna, P.: Visual composition as optimisation. In: AISB Symposium on AI and Creativity in Entertainment and Visual Art, Edinburgh, pp. 22–30 (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Phillips, C.B., Badler, N., Granieri, J.: Automatic viewing control for 3D direct manipulation. In: Zeltzer, D. (ed.) Computer Graphics (1992 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics), vol. 25, pp. 71–74 (March 1992)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ward, P.: Picture Composition for Film and Television. Focal Press, Woburn (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Bares
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceMillsaps CollegeJacksonUSA

Personalised recommendations