Dynamic Reconfiguration and Access to Services in Hierarchical Component Models

  • Petr Hnětynka
  • František Plášil
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4063)


This paper addresses the unavoidable problem of dynamic reconfig-uration in component-based system with a hierarchical component model. The presented solution is based on (1) allowing several well defined patterns of dynamic reconfiguration and on (2) introducing a utility interface concept, which allows using a service provided under the SOA paradigm from a component-based system. The paper is based on our experience with non-trivial case studies written for component-based systems SOFA and Fractal.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Aldrich, J., Chambers, C., Notkin, D.: ArchJava: Connecting Software Architecture to Implementation. In: Proceedings of ICSE 2002, Orlando, USA (May 2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen, R.: A Formal Approach to Software Architecture, PhD thesis, CMU (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baumeister, H., Hacklinger, F., Hennicker, R., Knapp, A., Wirsing, M.: A Component Model for Architectural Programming. In: Proceedings of FACS 2005, Macao (October 2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruneton, E., Coupaye, T., Leclercq, M., Quema, V., Stefani, J.B.: An Open Component Model and Its Support in Java. In: Crnković, I., Stafford, J.A., Schmidt, H.W., Wallnau, K. (eds.) CBSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3054, pp. 7–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chappell, D.A.: Enterprise Service Bus. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Enterprise Java Beans specification, version 2.1, Sun Microsystems (November 2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hnětynka, P., Píše, M.: Hand-written vs. MOF-based Metadata Repositories: The SOFA Experience. In: Proceedings of ECBS 2004, Brno, Czech Republic. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hnětynka, P., Plášil, F., Bureš, T., Mencl, V., Kapová, L.: SOFA 2.0 metamodel, Tech. Rep. 11/2005, Dept. of SW Engineering, Charles University, Prague (December 2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Inverardi, P., Wolf, A.L.: Formal Specification and Analysis of Software Architectures Using the Chemical Abstract Machine Model. IEEE Trans. on Soft. Eng. 21(4) (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Iribarne, L.: Web Components: A Comparison between Web Services and Software Components. Colombian Journal of Computation 5(1) (June 2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Lau, K.-K., Wang, Z.: A Taxonomy of Software Component Models. In: Proceedings of EUROMICRO-SEAA 2005, Porto, Portugal (September 2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Magee, J., Kramer, J.: Dynamic Structure in Software Architectures. In: Proceedings of FSE’4, San Francisco, USA (October 1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Medvidovic, N.: ADLs and dynamic architecture changes. In: Joint Proceedings SIGSOFT 1996 Workshops. ACM Press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    OMG: CORBA Components, v 3.0, OMG document formal/02-06-65 (June 2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    OMG: Deployment and Configuration of Component-based Distributed Applications Specification, OMG document ptc/05-01-07 (January 2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Plášil, F., Bálek, D., Janeček, R.: SOFA/DCUP: Architecture for Component Trading and Dynamic Updating. In: Proceedings of ICCDS 1998, Annapolis, USA. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Szyperski, C.: Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Taylor, R.N., et al.: A Component- and Message-Based Architectural Style for GUI Software. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 22(6) (June 1996)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Wells, G.: Coordination Languages: Back to the Future with Linda. In: Proceedings of WCAT 2005, Glasgow, UK (July 2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wermelingera, M., Fiadeiro, J.L.: A graph transformation approach to software architecture reconfiguration. Science of Computer Programming 44(2) (August 2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petr Hnětynka
    • 1
  • František Plášil
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Software Engineering, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics‘Charles UniversityPrague 1Czech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of Computer ScienceAcademy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicPrague 8Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations