The Advantages of the Signaling Strategy in a Dynamic Environment: Cognitive Modeling Using RoboCup

  • Sanjay Chandrasekharan
  • Babak Esfandiari
  • Tarek Hassan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4020)

Abstract

We report a cognitive modeling experiment where the RoboCup simulation environment was used to study the advantages provided by signals. We used the passing problem in RoboCup as our test problem and soccer-players’ ’yells’ of their ’passability’ values as the task-specific signals. We found that yells improve pass completion – using yells to decide the best player (to pass the ball) led to a 8-17 percentage points increase in performance compared to a centralized calculation of best pass. However, the passability values themselves did not make a difference, indicating that the advantage of signals come from their different perspective in identifying a pass, the actual content of signals do not matter. We present some problems we faced in using Robocup as a modeling environment, and suggest features that would help promote the use of RoboCup in cognitive modeling.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stopka, P., Macdonald, D.W.: Way-marking Behaviour: An Aid to Spatial Navigation in the Wood Mouse (Apodemus Sylvaticus). BMC Ecology (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Henry, J.D.: The Use of Urine Marking in the Scavenging Behaviour of the Red Fox (Vulpes Vulpes). Behaviour 62, 82–105 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zahavi, A., Zahavi, A.: The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bradbury, J.W., Vehrencamp, S.L.: Principles of Animal Communication. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chandrasekharan, S., Stewart, T.: Reactive agents learn to add epistemic structures to the world. In: Forbus, K.D., Gentner, D., Regier, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci. 2004, Chicago, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brooks, R.A.: Intelligence without Representation. Artificial Intelligence 47, 139–160 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kirsh, D.: Adapting the Environment Instead of Oneself. Adaptive Behavior 4(3/4), 415–452 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kirsh, D.: The Intelligent Use of Space. Artificial Intelligence 73, 31–68 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kok, J.R.: UvA TriLearn 2002 Source Code, University of Amsterdam (UvA), Faculty of Science Intelligent Autonomous Systems Group (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanjay Chandrasekharan
    • 1
  • Babak Esfandiari
    • 2
  • Tarek Hassan
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Cognitive Science 
  2. 2.Department of Systems and Computer EngineeringCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations