Using Semantic Constraints to Improve Question Answering

  • Jamileh Yousefi
  • Leila Kosseim
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3999)

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss our experience in using semantic constraints to improve the precision of a reformulation-based question-answering system. First, we present a method for acquiring semantic-based reformulations automatically. The goal is to generate patterns from sentences retrieved from the Web based on syntactic and semantic constraints. Once these constraints have been defined, we present a method to evaluate and re-rank candidate answers that satisfy these constraints using redundancy. The two approaches have been evaluated independently and in combination. The evaluation on about 500 questions from TREC-11 shows that the acquired semantic patterns increase the precision by 16% and the MRR by 26%, the re-ranking using semantic redundancy as well as the combined approach increase the precision by about 30% and the MRR by 67%. This shows that no manual work is now necessary to build question reformulations; while still increasing performance

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Soubbotin, M., Soubbotin, S.: Patterns of potential answer expressions as clues to the right answers. In: [3], 175–182Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brill, E., Lin, J., Banko, M., Dumais, S., Ng, A.: Data-Intensive Question Answering. In: Proceedings of The Tenth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-X), Gaithersburg, Maryland, pp. 393–400 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    NIST: Proceedings of TREC-10, Gaithersburg, Maryland, NIST (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aceves-Pérez, R.M., Villaseñor-Pineda, L., Montes-y-Gómez, M.: Towards a Multilingual QA System Based on the Web Data Redundancy. In: Szczepaniak, P.S., Kacprzyk, J., Niewiadomski, A. (eds.) AWIC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3528, pp. 32–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Agichtein, E., Lawrence, S., Gravano, L.: Learning search engine specific query transformations for question answering. In: Proceedings of WWW10, Hong Kong, pp. 169–178 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agichtein, E., Gravano, L.: Snowball: Extracting Relations from Large Plain-Text Collections. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lawrence, S., Giles, C.L.: Context and Page Analysis for Improved Web Search. IEEE Internet Computing 2, 38–46 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ravichandran, D., Hovy, E.H.: Learning surface text patterns for a question answering system. In: Proceedings of the 40th ACL conference, Philadelphia (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hermjakob, U., Echihabi, A., Marcu, D.: Natural language based reformulation resource and wide exploitation for question answering. [20]Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kwok, C.C.T., Etzioni, O., Weld, D.S.: Scaling question answering to the web. In: World Wide Web, pp. 150–161 (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Radev, D.R., Qi, H., Zheng, Z., Blair-Goldensohn, S., Zhang, Z., Fan, W., Prager, J.M.: Mining the web for answers to natural language questions. In: CIKM, pp. 143–150 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Duclaye, F., Yvon, F., Collin, O.: Using the Web as a Linguistic Resource for Learning Reformulations Automatically. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2002), Las Palmas, Spain, pp. 390–396 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kosseim, L., Plamondon, L., Guillemette, L.J.: Answer formulation for question-answering. In: Gedeon, T(T.) D., Fung, L.C.C. (eds.) AI 2003. LNCS, vol. 2903. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Plamondon, L., Lapalme, G., Kosseim, L.: The QUANTUM Question-Answering System at TREC-11. In: [20]Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    NIST: Proceedings of TREC-8, Gaithersburg, Maryland, NIST (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    NIST: Proceedings of TREC-9, Gaithersburg, Maryland, NIST (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Plamondon, L., Lapalme, G., Kosseim, L.: The QUANTUM Question Answering System. In: Proceedings of The Tenth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-10), Gaithersburg, Maryland, pp. 157–165 (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramshaw, L., Marcus, M.: Text chunking using transformation-based learning. In: Proceedings of the Third ACL Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pp. 82–94. MIT, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Porter, M.: An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 14, 130–137 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    NIST: Proceedings of TREC-11, Gaithersburg, Maryland, NIST (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jamileh Yousefi
    • 1
  • Leila Kosseim
    • 1
  1. 1.CLaC Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Software EngineeringConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations