ICCS 2006: Computational Science – ICCS 2006 pp 256-263 | Cite as
Nagel-Schreckenberg Model of Traffic – Study of Diversity of Car Rules
Conference paper
Abstract
The Nagel-Schreckenberg model of traffic is modified by the assumption that each car has an individual velocity limit. By simulations, the effect of supplementary rules is checked: (a) a speed limit of the slowest car is changed and\(\slash\)or (b) a speed limit of a car with zero gap behind is increased . It is shown that both rules increase the mean velocity; (b) rule influences the character of congested traffic – cars move though at low velocity.
Keywords
Speed Limit Cellular Automaton Model Vehicle Density Fundamental Diagram Slow Vehicle
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Download
to read the full conference paper text
References
- 1.Chowdhury, D., Santen, L., Schadschneider, A.: Statistical physics of vehicular traffic and some related systems. Phys. Rep. 329, 199–329 (2000)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 2.Helbing, D.: Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 1067–1141 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Nagel, K., Schreckenberg, M.: A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. J. Phys. I France 2, 2221–2229 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Fukui, M., Ishibashi, Y.: Traffic flow in 1d cellular automaton model including cars moving with high speed. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 1868–1870 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Knospe, W., Santen, L., Schadschneider, A., Schreckenberg, M.: An empirical test for cellular automaton models of traffic flow. Phys. Rev. E 70, 016115–1–016115–25 (2004)Google Scholar
- 6.Knospe, W., Santen, L., Schadschneider, A., Schreckenberg, M.: Towards a realistic microscopic description of highway traffic. J. Phys. A 33, L477–L485 (2000)Google Scholar
- 7.Brockfeld, E., Barlovic, R., Schadschneider, A., Schreckenberg, M.: Optimizing traffic lights in a cellular automaton model for city traffic. Phys. Rev. E 64, 056132 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Boccara, N., Fukś, H., Zeng, Q.: Car accidents and number of stopped cars due to road blockage on a one-lane highway. J. Phys. A 30, 3329–3332 (1997)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 9.Moussa, N.: Car accidents in cellular automata models for one-lane traffic flow. Phys. Rev. E 68, 36127 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Ebersbach, A., Schneider, J., Morgenstern, I.: Simulation traffic on german highways based on the nagel-schekenberg-model. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 12, 1081–1089 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Moussa, N.: Cellular automata for traffic flow with ”slow-to-start” rule: Effect of randomization. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 15, 29–43 (2004)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 12.Nakayama, A., Sugiyama, Y., Hasebe, K.: Effect of looking at the car that follows in an optimal velocity model of traffic flow. Phys. Rev. E 65, 016112–1–06112–6 (2001)Google Scholar
- 13.Xue, Y., Dong, L., Li, L., Dai, S.: Effects of changing ordres in the update rules on traffic flow. Phys. Rev. E 71, 026123–1–026123–6 (2005)Google Scholar
- 14.Bak, P., Tang, C., Wiesenfeld, K.: Self-organized criticality. Phys. Rev. A 38, 365–374 (1988)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006