Towards Reliable and Trustworthy Cooperation in Grid: A Pre-evaluating Set Based Trust Model

  • Xiangli Qu
  • Jingwei Zhong
  • Xuejun Yang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3984)


Without reliable trust relationship between cooperative parities, the paradigm of large scale resource sharing and cooperated problem-solving as envisioned by most will not come true in Grid. With wide application in Electronic Commerce and online communities, Reputation mechanism emerges as a promising solution for trust establishment in Grid, especially between unknown entities. With little consideration of Grid’s distinct characteristics such as the sparseness of ratings and the strangeness of entities, most reputation evaluation methods currently available are not feasible to Grid. In this paper, we propose a pre-evaluating set based bias-tuned method for reputation evaluation in Grid. The introduction of the pre-evaluating set is to track an entity’s rating criteria, overcome the sparseness and strangeness mentioned above. With this pre-evaluating set, we can reasonably filter out malicious ratings by examining inconsistency between ratings to this set and to real transactions, effectively tune a rater’s bias to cater to the current evaluator’s criteria by interpolation approach and scientifically weight a rater’s rating in aggregation by the introduction of Criteria Coherent Degree.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Lorch, M., Kafura, D.: Grid Community Characteristics and their Relation to Grid Security. VT CS Technical Report (2003),
  2. 2.
    Azzedin, F., Maheswaran, M.: Evolving and Managing Trust in Grid Computing Systems. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical Computer Engineering (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abdul-Rahman, A., Hailes, S.: Supporting Trust in Virtual Communities. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 6 (January 2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yu, B., Singh, M.P.: A Social Mechanism of Reputation Management in electronic Communities. In: Cooperative Information Agents, pp. 154–165 (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dellarocas, C.: Immunizing Online Reputation Reporting Systems Against Unfair Ratings and Discriminatory Behavior. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, Minneapolis, MN, October 17–20 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Whitby, A., Josang, A., Indulska, J.: Filtering out unfair ratings in bayesian reputation systems. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Trust in Agent Societies, at the 3rd International conference on Autonomous Agents & Multi Agent Systems (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kamvar, S.D., Schlosser, M.T., Garcia-Molina, H.: The EigenTrust Algorithm for Reputation Management in P2P Networks. In: Twelfth International World Wide Web Conference (2003),
  8. 8.
    Damiani, E., di Vimercati, D.C., Paraboschi, S., Samarati, P., Violante, F.: Reputation-based Method for Choosing Reliable Resources in Peer-to-peer Networks. In: Proc. of the 9th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yu, B., Singh, M.P.: An Evidential Model of Distributed Reputation Management. In: Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Part 1, pp. 294–301 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Richardson, M., Agrawal, R., Domingos, P.: Trust management for the Semantic web. In: Proceedings of the Second International Semantic Web Conference, pp. 351–368 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xiong, L., Liu, L.: PeerTrust: Supporting Reputation-Based Trust in Peer-to-Peer Communities. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (TKDE), Special Issue on Peer-to-Peer Based Data Management 16(7) (July 2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Massa, P., Bhattacharjee, B.: Using trust in recommender systems: An experimental analysis. In: Jensen, C., Poslad, S., Dimitrakos, T. (eds.) iTrust 2004. LNCS, vol. 2995, pp. 221–235. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Qu, X., Xiao, N., Xiang, G., Yang, X.: Reputation-aware contract-supervised grid computing. In: Jin, H., Pan, Y., Xiao, N., Sun, J. (eds.) GCC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3252, pp. 44–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Czajkowski, K., Foster, I., Kesselman, C., Sander, V., Tuecke, S.: SNAP: A protocol for negotiating service level agreements and coordinating resource management in distributed systems. In: Feitelson, D.G., Rudolph, L., Schwiegelshohn, U. (eds.) JSSPP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2537, pp. 153–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Qu, X., Yang, X.J., Tang, Y., Zhou, H.: A behavior characteristics-based reputation evaluation method for grid entities. In: Sloot, P.M.A., Hoekstra, A.G., Priol, T., Reinefeld, A., Bubak, M. (eds.) EGC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3470, pp. 567–577. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiangli Qu
    • 1
  • Jingwei Zhong
    • 1
  • Xuejun Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer ScienceNational University of Defense TechnologyChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations