A Blind Method Towards Performance Improvement of High Performance TCP with Random Losses

  • Qiang Fu
  • Grenville Armitage
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3970)


The deployment of high performance networks and the emergence of broadband wireless access technologies challenge the performance of standard TCP. Recent years have seen a few high performance and aggressive TCP variants being proposed. These TCP variants still suffer significant performance degradation from random/transient packet losses. In this paper, we introduce and evaluate a new method to improve high performance TCP in the presence of random packet losses. It is ‘blind’ in that our method does not attempt to differentiate between random and congestion-induced losses. Our method combines both TCP parallelisation and modification to the aggressiveness of studied AIMD algorithms. We show that our proposed method is no more aggressive than the studied TCP variants in the presence of congestion but more effectively utilises bandwidth in the presence of random packet losses.


Packet Loss Packet Loss Rate Congestion Window Random Loss Throughput Ratio 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Barman, D., Smaragdakis, G., Matta, I.: The Effect of Router Buffer Size on HighSpeed TCP Performance. In: Globecom 2004, Dallas, USA (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barakat, C., Altman, E.: Bandwidth Tradeoff between TCP and Link-Level FEC. Computer Networks 39(2) (June 2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang, C., Tsaoussidis, V.: The Interrelation of TCP Responsiveness and Smoothness in Heterogeneous Networks. In: ISCC 2002, Washington, USA (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tsaoussidis, V., Zhang, C.: The Dynamics of Responsiveness and Smoothness in Heterogeneous Networks. IEEE J. on Selected Areas in Comm. 23(6) (June 2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kelly, T.: Scalable TCP: Improving performance in highspeed wide area networks. Computer Communication Review 32(2) (April 2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Floyd, S.: HighSpeed TCP for Large Congestion Windows. RFC 3649 (December 2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shorten, R., Leith, D.: H-TCP: TCP for high-speed and long-distance networks. In: PFLDnet 2004, Argonne, USA (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xu, L., Harfoush, K., Rhee, I.: Binary Increase Congestion Control for Fast Long-Distance Networks. In: INFOCOM 2004, Hong Kong, China (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rhee, I., Xu, L.: CUBIC: A New TCP-Friendly High-Speed TCP Variant. In: PFLDnet 2005, Lyon, France (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fu, Q., Indulska, J.: Examining TCP Parallelization Related Methods for Various Packet Losses. In: Braun, T., Carle, G., Koucheryavy, Y., Tsaoussidis, V. (eds.) WWIC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3510, pp. 54–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fu, Q., Indulska, J.: The Impact of Fast Recovery on Parallel TCP connections. In: HET-NETs 2004, Ilkley, UK (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li, Y., Leith, D., Shorten, R.: Experimental Evaluation of TCP Protocols for High-Speed Networks (June 2005), URL:
  13. 13.
    Shenker, S., Zhang, L., Clark, D.: Some observations on the dynamics of a congestion control algorithm. In: SIGCOMM (1990)Google Scholar
  14. 14.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qiang Fu
    • 1
  • Grenville Armitage
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Advanced Internet ArchitecturesSwinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations