Constraint-Based Deployment of Distributed Components in a Dynamic Network

  • Didier Hoareau
  • Yves Mahéo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3894)


Hierarchical software components offer interesting characteristics for the development of complex applications. However, supporting the deployment of such applications is difficult, especially on challenging distributed platforms. This paper addresses the distribution and the deployment of hierarchical components on heterogeneous dynamic networks. Such networks may include fixed and mobile resource-constrained devices and are characterized by the volatility of their hosts and connections, which may lead to their fragmentation. The distribution scheme and the associated mechanisms we propose allow a component to provide its services in an ubiquitous way and to operate in a degraded mode. The deployment of hierarchical components is described: we present an ADL extension for specifying a context-aware deployment and we detail a hierarchically-controlled deployment designed for dynamic networks. This deployment is performed in a propagative way and is driven by constraints put on the resources of the target hosts.


Dynamic Network Location Constraint Composite Component Consensus Problem Target Host 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Roussain, H., Guidec, F.: Cooperative Component-Based Software Deployment in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. In: Dearle, A., Eisenbach, S. (eds.) CD 2005. LNCS, vol. 3798, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoareau, D., Mahéo, Y.: Distribution of a Hierarchical Component in a Non-Connected Environment. In: 31th Euromicro Conference - Component-Based Software Engineering Track, Porto, Portugal. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruneton, E., Coupaye, T., Leclercq, M., Quéma, V., Stefani, J.B.: An Open Component Model and its Support in Java. In: Crnković, I., Stafford, J.A., Schmidt, H.W., Wallnau, K. (eds.) CBSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3054, pp. 7–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Ommering, R.C.: Koala, a Component Model for Consumer Electronics Product Software. In: ESPRIT ARES Workshop, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, pp. 76–86 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Magee, J., Dulay, N., Eisenbach, S., Kramer, J.: Specifying Distributed Software Architectures. In: Botella, P., Schäfer, W. (eds.) ESEC 1995. LNCS, vol. 989, pp. 137–153. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Plasil, F., Balek, D., Janecek, R.: SOFA/DCUP: Architecture for Component Trading and Dynamic Updating. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Configurable Distributed Systems (ICCDS 1998), Annapolis, Maryland, US (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Medvidovic, N., Taylor, R.N.: A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 26(1), 70–93 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    xacme: Acme extensions to xarch. School of Computer Science Web Site (2001),
  9. 9.
    Dashofy, E.M., van der Hoek, A., Taylor, R.N.: An infrastructure for the rapid development of XML-based architecture description languages. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2002), Orlando, Florida, USA, pp. 266–276 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dearle, A., Kirby, G.N.C., McCarthy, A.J.: A framework for constraint-based deployment and autonomic management of distributed applications. In: ICAC, pp. 300–301 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Quéma, V., Balter, R., Bellissard, L., Féliot, D., Freyssinet, A., Lacourte, S.: Asynchronous, hierarchical and scalable deployment of component-based applications. In: Emmerich, W., Wolf, A.L. (eds.) CD 2004. LNCS, vol. 3083, pp. 50–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mostéfaoui, A., Rajsbaum, S., Raynal, M., Roy, M.: Condition-based consensus solvability: a hierarchy of conditions and efficient protocols. Distributed Computing 17(1), 1–20 (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mahéo, Y., Guidec, F., Courtrai, L.: A Java Middleware Platform for Resource-Aware Distributed Applications. In: 2nd Int. Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Computing (ISPDC 2003), Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp. 96–103. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Medvidovíc, N., Mikic-Rakic, M.: Software Architectural Support for Disconnected Operation in Highly Distributed Environments. In: Crnković, I., Stafford, J.A., Schmidt, H.W., Wallnau, K. (eds.) CBSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3054, pp. 23–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li, T., Hoffmann, A., Born, M., Schieferdecker, I.: A platform architecture to support the deployment of distributed applications. In: ICC, IEEE International Conference on Communications, vol. 4, pp. 2592–2596 (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mikic-Rakic, M., Medvidovic, N.: Architecture-level support for software component deployment in resource constrained environments. In: Bishop, J.M. (ed.) CD 2002. LNCS, vol. 2370, pp. 31–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Didier Hoareau
    • 1
  • Yves Mahéo
    • 1
  1. 1.Valoria LabUniversity of South BrittanyFrance

Personalised recommendations