Advertisement

Analysing Meeting Records: An Ethnographic Study and Technological Implications

  • Steve Whittaker
  • Rachel Laban
  • Simon Tucker
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3869)

Abstract

Whilst there has been substantial research into the support of meetings, there has been relatively little study of how meeting participants currently make records and how these records are used to direct collective and individual actions outside the meeting. This paper empirically investigates current meeting recording practices in order to both understand fundamental collaboration processes and to determine how these might be better supported by technology. Our main findings were that participants create two types of meeting record. Public records are a collectively negotiated contract of decisions and commitments. Personal records, in contrast, are a highly personalised reminding tool, recording both actions and the context surrounding these actions. These observations are then used to informally evaluate current meeting support technology and to suggest new directions for research.

Keywords

Ethnographic Study Public Record Detailed Note Meeting Minute Meeting Participant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Green, W.A., Lazarus, H.: Are today’s executives meeting with success. Journal of Management Development 1(10), 14–25 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moran, T.P., Palen, L., Harrison, S., Chiu, P., Kimber, D., Minneman, S., Melle, W., Zellweger, P.: I’ll get that off the audio: A Case study of salvaging multimedia meeting records. In: Proceedings of the CHI 1997, Atlanta, Georgia (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilcox, L., Schilit, B.N., Sawhney, N.: Dynomite: A Dynamically Organized Ink And Audio Notebook. In: Proceedings of CHI 1997, Atlanta, Georgia (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Whittaker, S., Hyland, P., Wiley, M.: Filochat: Handwritten Notes Provide Access To Recorded Conversations. In: Proceedings of CHI 1994, Boston, Massachusetts, USA (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chiu, P., Boreczky, J., Girgensohn, A., Kimber, D.: LiteMinutes: An Internet-Based System For Multimedia Meeting Minutes. In: Proceedings of 10th WWW Conference, Hong Kong, pp. 140–149 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cutler, R., Rui, Y., Gupta, A., Cadiz, J.J., Tashev, I., He, L., Colburn, A., Zhang, Z., Liu, Z., Silverberg, S.: Distributed Meetings: A Meeting Capture And Broadcasting System. In: Proc. of the 10th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 503–512 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tucker, S., Whittaker, S.: Accessing multimodal meeting data: Systems, problems and possibilities. In: Bengio, S., Bourlard, H. (eds.) MLMI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3361, pp. 1–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Whittaker, S., Hitschberg, J., Amento, B., Stark, L., Bacchiani, M., Isenhour, P., Stead, L., Zamchick, G., Rosenberg, A.: SCANMail: A Voicemail Interface That Makes Speech Browsable, Readable and Searchable. In: Proceedings of CHI 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Colbath, S., Kubala, F.: Rough ‘n’ Ready: A Meeting Recorder and Browser. In: Proceedings of the Perceptual User Interface Conference, San Francisco, CA, November 1998, pp. 220–223 (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee, D., Erol, B., Graham, J., Hull, J.J., Murata, N.: Portable Meeting Recorder. In: Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia, pp. 493–502 (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reidsma, D., Akker, R., Rienks, R., Poppe, R., Poppe, R., Nijholt, A., Heylen, D., Zwiers, J.: Virtual Meeting Rooms: From Observation to Simulation. In: Proceedings of Social Intelligence Design (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wellner, P., Flynn, M., Guillemot, M.: Browsing Recordings of Multi-party Interactions in Ambient Intelligent Environments. In: CHI 2004 Workshop #9: Lost in Ambient Intelligence (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lalanne, D., Sire, S., Ingold, R., Behera, A., Mekhaldi, D., Rotz, D.: A Research Agenda For Assessing The Utility Of Document Annotations In Multimedia Databases Of Meeting Recordings. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Multimedia Data And Document Engineering, Berlin, Germany (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davis, R.C., Landay, J.A., Chen, V., Huang, J., Lee, R.B., Li, F.C., Lin, J., Morrey, C.B., Schleimer, B., Price, M.N., Schilit, B.N.: NotePals: Lightweight Sharing by the Group, for the Group. In: Proceedings of CHI 1999, pp. 338–345 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steve Whittaker
    • 1
  • Rachel Laban
    • 1
  • Simon Tucker
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information StudiesUniversity of Sheffield, Regent CourtSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations