Practical Declarative Model Transformation with Tefkat
We present Tefkat, an implementation of a language designed specifically for the transformation of MOF models using patterns and rules. The language adopts a declarative paradigm, wherein users may concern themselves solely with the relations between the models rather than needing to deal explicitly with issues such as order of rule execution and pattern searching/traversal of input models. In this paper, we demonstrate the language using a provided example and highlight a number of language features used in solving the problem, a simple object-to-relational mapping.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Duddy, K., Gerber, A., Lawley, M., Raymond, K., Steel, J.: Model transformation: A declarative, reusable patterns approach. In: Proc. 7th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, EDOC 2003, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 174–195 (2003)Google Scholar
- 3.Duddy, K., Gerber, A., Lawley, M., Raymond, K., Steel, J.: Declarative transformation for object-oriented models. In: van Bommel, P. (ed.) Transformation of Knowledge, Information, and Data: Theory and Applications. Idea Group Publishing, USA (2004)Google Scholar
- 4.Lawley, M., Duddy, K., Gerber, A., Raymond, K.: Language features for re-use and maintainability of MDA transformations. In: OOPSLA workshop on Best Practices for Model-Driven Software Development, Vancouver, Canada (2004)Google Scholar
- 5.DSTC, IBM, CBOP: MOF Query/View/Transformation, initial submission (2003)Google Scholar
- 6.OMG: Request for Proposal: MOF 2.0 Query/Views/Transformations RFP. OMG Document: ad/02-04-10 (2002)Google Scholar
- 7.Metke, A.: Change propagation in the MDA: A model merging approach. Master’s thesis, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland (2005)Google Scholar
- 8.Henderson, F., Somogyi, Z., Conway, T.: Determinism analysis in the Mercury compiler. In: Proceedings of the Australian Computer Science Conference, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 337–346 (1996)Google Scholar
- 9.Naish, L.: A three-valued declarative debugging scheme. Technical Report 97/5, Department of Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (1997)Google Scholar
- 10.Dai, Z.R.: Model-driven testing with UML 2.0. In: Akehurst, D. (ed.) Second European Workshop on Model Driven Architecture (MDA), Canterbury, Kent, pp. 179–187. University of Kent (2004)Google Scholar
- 11.Beale, T., Goodchild, A., Heard, S.: EHR design principles(2002), http://titanium.dstc.edu.au/papers/ehr_design_principles.pdf