PerfSONAR: A Service Oriented Architecture for Multi-domain Network Monitoring

  • Andreas Hanemann
  • Jeff W. Boote
  • Eric L. Boyd
  • Jérôme Durand
  • Loukik Kudarimoti
  • Roman Łapacz
  • D. Martin Swany
  • Szymon Trocha
  • Jason Zurawski
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3826)

Abstract

In the area of network monitoring a lot of tools are already available to measure a variety of metrics. However, these tools are often limited to a single administrative domain so that no established methodology for the monitoring of network connections spanning over multiple domains currently exists. In addition, these tools only monitor the network from a technical point of view without providing meaningful network performance indicators for different user groups. These indicators should be derived from the measured basic metrics.

In this paper a Service Oriented Architecture is presented which is able to perform multi-domain measurements without being limited to specific kinds of metrics. A Service Oriented Architecture has been chosen as it allows for increased flexibility and scalability in comparison to traditional software engineering techniques. The resulting measurement framework will be applied for measurements in the European Research Network (GÉANT) and connected National Research and Education Networks in Europe as well as in the United States.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Boote, J., Boyd, E., Durand, J., Hanemann, A., Kudarimoti, L., Lapacz, R., Simar, N., Trocha, S.: Towards multi-domain monitoring for the european research networks. In: Proceedings of the Tenera Networking Conference 2005 (TNC 2005), Poznan, Poland (June 2005); TERENAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, T., Hu, L.: Internet performance monitoring. Proceedings of the IEEE 90(9), 1592–1603 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DANTE homepage including information about GÉANT, performit and GN2 projects, http://www.dante.net/
  5. 5.
    Wp7 - network services, DataGrid project, http://ccwp7.in2p3.fr
  6. 6.
    E2Epi performance evaluation system (piPEs), Internet2, End-to-End Performance Initiative, http://e2epi.internet2.edu/
  7. 7.
    Joint Research Activity 4, Enabling Grids for E-SciencE (EGEE) project, http://egee-jra4.web.cern.ch/EGEE-JRA4/
  8. 8.
    Energy Sciences Network, http://www.es.net
  9. 9.
    Globus toolkit, version 4.0, http://www.globus.org/
  10. 10.
    INTERMON project, http://www.intermon.org/
  11. 11.
    JINI network technology, Sun Microsystems, http://www.sun.com/software/jini, http://www.jini.org
  12. 12.
    JXTA, Sun Microsystems, http://jxta.org/
  13. 13.
    MONitoring Agents using a Large Integrated Services Architecture (MonALISA), California Institute of Technology, http://monalisa.caltech.edu/
  14. 14.
    Network measurements working group (NMWG), Global Grid Forum, http://www-didc.lbl.gov/NMWG
  15. 15.
    PlanetLab project, http://www.planet-lab.org/
  16. 16.
    Round robin database tool homepage, http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/rrdtool/
  17. 17.
    Specification of the general architecture, protocolas, and message formats of the shibboleth mechanism, http://shibboleth.internet2.edu/docs/draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-06.pdf
  18. 18.
    Simple Object Access Protocol, World Wide Web consortium, http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group
  19. 19.
    Apache Tomcat, Apache Jakarta project, http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/
  20. 20.
    Xerces xml parser, c++ version, Apache project, http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Hanemann
    • 1
  • Jeff W. Boote
    • 2
  • Eric L. Boyd
    • 2
  • Jérôme Durand
    • 3
  • Loukik Kudarimoti
    • 4
  • Roman Łapacz
    • 5
  • D. Martin Swany
    • 6
  • Szymon Trocha
    • 5
  • Jason Zurawski
    • 6
  1. 1.German Research Network (DFN), c/o Leibniz Supercomputing CenterMunichGermany
  2. 2.Internet2Ann ArborUSA
  3. 3.GIP RenaterParisFrance
  4. 4.DANTECambridgeUnited Kingdom
  5. 5.Poznan Supercomputing and Networking CenterPoznanPoland
  6. 6.Department of Computer and Information SciencesUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations