On Service Discovery Process Types

  • Peer Hasselmeyer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3826)


With the growing adoption of service-oriented computing, locating services becomes increasingly commonplace. Accordingly, a large number of systems for service discovery have been developed. Although all these systems perform the same function, they do it in lots of different ways. Finding commonalities of and differences between these systems can be hard due to the lack of criteria to compare and classify various discovery schemes.

This paper identifies the processes of registration and look-up as a distinguishing feature of the various discovery systems. It describes the possible types of processes, shows how they are distributed across the lifecycles of the involved entities and classifies existing service discovery systems according to these criteria. Some hints are given on how the process-based view can help guide the selection of a particular discovery style for a problem at hand.


Process Type Service Discovery Discovery System Service Description Static Registration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Bettstetter, C., Renner, C.: A Comparison of Service Discovery Protocols and Implementation of the Service Location Protocol. In: Proceedings EUNICE Open European Summer School, Twente, Netherlands (September 2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gao, J., Steenkiste, P.: Design and Evaluation of a Distributed Scalable Content Discovery System. Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 22(1), 54–66 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gray, C.G., Cheriton, D.R.: Leases: An Efficient Fault-Tolerant Mechanism for Distributed File Cache Consistency. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Symposium on Operating System Principles, December 1989, pp. 202–210 (1989)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Helal, S.: Standards for Service Discovery and Delivery. IEEE Pervasive Computing 1(3), 95–100 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clark, M.: UDDI – The Weather Report (November 2001),
  6. 6.
    Mockapetris, P.V.: Domain Names - Concepts and Facilities. Internet RFC 1034 (November 1987)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Ratnasamy, S., Francis, P., Handley, M., Karp, R., Schenker, S.: A Scalable Content-Addressable Network. In: Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications (SIGCOMM 2001), August 2001, pp. 161–172 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sun Microsystems Inc. Jini Architecture Specification – Version 2.0 (June 2003),
  10. 10.
    Vanthournout, K., Deconinck, G., Belmans, R.: A Taxonomy for Resource Discovery. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Journal 9(2), 81–89 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peer Hasselmeyer
    • 1
  1. 1.C&C Research Laboratories, NEC Europe Ltd.Sankt AugustinGermany

Personalised recommendations