EUC 2005: Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing – EUC 2005 Workshops pp 189-197 | Cite as
Intrinsically Motivated Intelligent Rooms
Abstract
Intelligent rooms are responsive environments in which human activities are monitored and responses are generated to facilitate these activities. Research and development on intelligent rooms currently focuses on the integration of multiple sensor devices with pre-programmed responses to specific triggers. Developments in intelligent agents towards intrinsically motivated learning agents can be integrated with the concept of an intelligent room. The resulting model focuses developments in intelligent rooms on a characteristic reasoning process that uses motivation to guide action and learning. Using a motivated learning agent model as the basis for an intelligent room opens up the possibility of intelligent environments being able to adapt both to people’s changing usage patterns and to the addition of new capabilities, via the addition of new sensors and effectors, with relatively little need for reconfiguration by humans.
Keywords
Intelligent Agent Ubiquitous Computing Agent Model World State Novelty DetectorReferences
- 1.Brooks, R.A., Coen, M., Dang, D., DeBonet, J., Kramer, J., Lozano-Perez, T., Mellor, J., Pook, P., Stauffer, C., Stein, L., Torrance, M., Wessler, M.: The Intelligent Room Project. In: Proceedings of the Second International Cognitive Technology Conference (CT 1997), Aizu, Japan, pp. 271–279 (1997)Google Scholar
- 2.Coen, M.H.: Design Principles for Intelligent Environments. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth National / Tenth Conference on Artificial Intelligence / Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Madison, Wisconsin, United States, pp. 547–554 (1998)Google Scholar
- 3.Singh, S., Barto, A.G., Chentanez, N.: Intrinsically Motivated Reinforcement Learning (2004), http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~baveja/Papers/FinalNIPSIMRL.pdf (Accessed 7/4/2004)
- 4.Jeng, T.: Designing a Ubiquitous Smart Space of the Future: The Principle of Mapping. In: Gero, J.S. (ed.): Design Computing and Cognition 2004, pp. 579–592. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands (2004)Google Scholar
- 5.Kulkarni, A.: Design Principles of a Reactive Behavioral System for The Intelligent Room. Bitstream: The MIT Journal of EECS Student Research, 1–5 (April 2002)Google Scholar
- 6.Kottahachchi, B., Laddaga, R.: Access Controls for Intelligent Environments. In: Proceedings of ISDA 2004: 4th Annual International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, Budapest, Hungary (2004)Google Scholar
- 7.Hanssens, N., Kulkarni, A., Tuchinda, R., Horton, T.: Building Agent-Based Intelligent Workspaces. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Internet Computing, pp. 675–681 (2002)Google Scholar
- 8.Román, M., Hess, C.K., Cerqueira, R., Ranganathan, A., Campbell, R.H., Nahrstedt, K.N.: Gaia: A Middleware Infrastructure to Enable Active Spaces. In: IEEE Pervasive Computing, pp. 74–83 (October-December 2002)Google Scholar
- 9.Johanson, B., Fox, A., Winograd, T.: The Interactive Workspaces Project: Experiences With Ubiquitous Computing Rooms. IEEE Pervasive Computing Magazine 1(2), 67–74 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Kidd, C., Orr, R., Abowd, G., Atkeson, C., Essa, I., MacIntyre, B., Mynatt, E., Starner, T., Newstetter, W.: The Aware Home: A Living Laboratory for Ubiquitous Computing Research. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Cooperative Buildings, Pittsburgh, PA (1999)Google Scholar
- 11.Norman, T.J., Long, D.P.: Goal Creation in Motivated Agents. In: Wooldridge, M.J., Jennings, N.R. (eds.) Intelligent Agents: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 890, pp. 277–290. Springer, Heidelberg (1995a)Google Scholar
- 12.Norman, T.J., Long, D.P.: Alarms: Heuristics for the Control of Reasoning Attention. In: Moore, J., Lehman, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 494–499 (1995)Google Scholar
- 13.Norman, T.J., Long, D.P.: Alarms: An Implementation of Motivated Agency. In: Tambe, M., Müller, J., Wooldridge, M.J. (eds.) IJCAI-WS 1995 and ATAL 1995. LNCS(LNAI), vol. 1037, pp. 219–234. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)Google Scholar
- 14.Beaudoin, L.P., Sloman, A.: A Study of Motive Processing and Attention. In: Sloman, A., Hogg, D., Humphreys, G., Partridge, D., Ramsay, A. (eds.) Prospects for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 229–238. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1993)Google Scholar
- 15.Aylett, R.S., Coddington, A.M., Petley, G.J.: Agent-Based Continuous Planning (2000), http://planning.cis.strath.ac.uk/plansig/pastsigs/open-univ-19/aylett.pdf (Accessed 7/4/2005)
- 16.Kasmarik, K., Uther, W., Maher, M.-L.: Motivated Agents. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 1505–1506 (2005)Google Scholar
- 17.Saunders, R., Gero, J.S.: Designing for Interest and Novelty: Motivating Design Agents. In: de Vries, B., van Leeuwen, J., Achten, H. (eds.) CAADFutures 2001, pp. 725–738. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001)Google Scholar
- 18.Saunders, R., Gero, J.S.: Curious Agents and Situated Design Evaluations. In: Gero, J.S., Brazier, F. (eds.) Agents in Design 2002, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, pp. 133–149. University of Sydney, Australia (2002)Google Scholar
- 19.Saunders, R., Gero, J.S.: The Digital Clockwork Muse: A Computational Model of Aesthetic Evolution. In: Wiggins, G. (ed.) Proceedings of the AISB 2001 Symposium on AI and Creativity in Arts and Science, pp. 12–21. University of York, York (2001)Google Scholar
- 20.Schmidhuber, J.: What’s interesting? Technical Report IDSIA-35-97, Lugano, Switzerland (1997)Google Scholar