Advertisement

Socionics pp 199-217 | Cite as

Coordination in Scaling Actor Constellations

The Advantages of Small-World Networks
  • Christian W. G. Lasarczyk
  • Thomas Kron
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3413)

Abstract

The emergence of order in systems with many actors or agents is an interesting problem for sociology as well as for computer science. Starting the from sociological theory of the dyadic “situation of double contingency”, our main focus is on large actor populations and their capability to produce order depending on different actors’ constellations. Based on the theory for dyadic actor constellations we present our model of the actor. We do not want the actors to identify one another, so we do not need to modify this model if we scale up population size next and introduce constellations. Thereby we take regular, random and small–world constellations into account. After describing our measures of order we study emergence of order in different constellations for varying population sizes. By means of simulation experiments we show that systems with small–worlds exhibit highest order on large populations which gently decreases on increasing population sizes.

Keywords

Random Graph Social Order Interaction Partner Coordination Problem Regular Lattice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schimank, U.: Handeln und Strukturen. Juventa, Weinheim (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Esser, H.: Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. Band 3: Soziales Handeln. Campus, Frankfurt/Main, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hobbes, T.: Leviathan. In: Molesworth, W. (ed.) Collected EnglishWorks of Thomas Hobbes, vol. 3. Taylor and Francis Books Ltd, Aalen (1966) (first edn. 1651)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith, A.: The Wealth of Nations. Oxford Pniversity Press (1985) (first edn. 1904)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Durkheim, E.: De la division du travail social. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris (1968) (first edn. 1893)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parsons, T.: The Structure of Social Action. Free Press, New York (1937)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parsons, T.: The System of Modern Society. Englewood Cliffs (1971)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Axelrod, R.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Simmel, G.: Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main (1992) (first edn. 1908)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schimank, U.: Theorien gesellschaftlicher Differenzierung. Leske + Budrich, Opladen (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parsons, T.: Social interaction. In: Sills, D.L. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 7, pp. 429–441. MacMillan, New York (1968)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parsons, T.: The Social System. Free Press, New York (1951)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Münch, R.: The American Creed in Sociological Theory: Exchange, Negotiated Order, Accommodated Individualism and Contingency. Sociological Theory 4, 41–60 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luhmann, N.: Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main (1984)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schimank, U.: Gesellschaftliche Teilsysteme als Akteurfiktionen. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 4, 619–639 (1988)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schimank, U.: Erwartungssicherheit und Zielverfolgung. Sozialität zwischen Prisoner’s Dilemma und Battle of the Sexes. Soziale Welt 2, 182–200 (1992)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leydesdorff, L.: “Structure” / “Action” Contingencies and the Model of Parallel Processing. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 23, 47–77 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Papendick, S., Wellner, J.: Symbolemergenz und Strukturdifferenzierung. In: Kron, T. (ed.): Luhmann modelliert. Sozionische Ansätze zur Simulation von Kommunikationssystemen. Leske + Budrich, Opladen, pp. 175–208 (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dittrich, P., Kron, T., Banzhaf, W.: On the Scalability of Social Order. Modeling the Problem of Double and Multi Contingency Following Luhmann. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 6 (2003), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/1/3.html
  20. 20.
    Kron, T., Dittrich, P.: Doppelte Kontingenz nach Luhmann – Ein Simulationsexperiment. In: Kron, T. (ed.): Luhmann modelliert. Ansätze zur Simulation von Kommunikationssystemen. Leske + Buderich, Opladen, Germany, pp. 209 – 251 (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lasarczyk, C.W.G., Kron, T.: Globale Kohärenz in sozialen Systemen. In: Burkhard, H.D., Uthmann, T., Lindemann, G. (eds.) Modellierung und Simulation menschlichen Verhaltens, Berlin. Informatik Berichte, vol. 163, pp. 77–91, Humboldt–Universität zu Berlin (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shannon, C.E.: A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27, 379–423, 623–656 (1948)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Esser, H.: Soziologie. Allgemeine Grundlagen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Esser, H.: Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. Bd. 1: Situationslogik und Handeln. Campus, Frankfurt/Main, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barabási, A.L.: Linked. Perseus Books Group, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Buchanan, M.: Nexus: Small Worlds and the Groundbreaking Science of Networks. W. Norton & Co., New York (2002)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Watts, D.J.: Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age. W.W. Norton & Company, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Newmann, M.E.J.: Models of the Small World. Journal of Statistical Physics 101, 819–841 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Milgram, S.: The Small–World Problem. Psychology Today 1, 60–67 (1967)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Granovetter, M.: The Strengh of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78, 1360–1380 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Watts, D.J., Strogatzith, S.H.: Collective Dynamics of ‘Small-World’ Networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Watts, D.J.: Networks, Dynamics and The Small World Phenomenon. American Journal of Sociology 105, 493–527 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Watts, D.J.: Small-Worlds. The Dynamics of networks between Order and Randomness, Princeton University–Press, Princeton (1999)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Amaral, L.A.N.: Classes of small-world networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 97, 11149–11152 (2000)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Erickson, B.: Social Networks: the Value of Variety. Contexts 2, 25–31 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Greshoff, R., Kneer, G.: Struktur und Ereignis in theorievergleichender Perspektive. Westdeutscher, Opladen (1999)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Reckwitz, A.: Struktur. Zur sozialwissenschaftlichen Analyse von Regeln und Regelmäßigkeiten. Westdeutscher, Opladen (1997)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kron, T., Lasarczyk, C.W.G., Schimank, U.: Zur Bedeutung von Netzwerken für Kommunikationssysteme – Ergebnisse einer Simulationsstudie. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 32 (2003)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mead, G.H.: Geist, Identität und Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main (1973)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Merton, R.K.: The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action. American Sociological Review 6, 894–904 (1936)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Durkheim, E.: Über soziale Arbeitsteilung. Studie über die Organisation höherer Gesellschaften. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main (1992)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kron, T.: Moralische Individualität. Leske + Budrich, Opladen (2001)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Münch, R.: Dialektik der Kommunikationsgesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main (1991)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Giddens, A.: The Constitution of Society. Polity Press, Cambridge (1984)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lepperhoff, N.: Dreamscape: Simulation der Entstehung von Normen im Naturzustand mittels eines computerbasierten Modells des Rational-Choice-Ansatzes. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 29, 463–486 (2000)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Latora, V., Marchiori, M.: Economic small–world behavior in weighted networks. The European Physical Journal B 32, 249–263 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Steels, L.: The spontaneous self-organization of an adaptive language. In: Muggleton, S. (ed.) Machine Intelligence 15 Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian W. G. Lasarczyk
    • 1
  • Thomas Kron
    • 2
  1. 1.Computer ScienceUniversity of Dortmund 
  2. 2.Institute for SociologyOpen University of Hagen 

Personalised recommendations