Systematically Evolving Configuration Parameters for Computational Intelligence Methods

  • Jason M. Proctor
  • Rosina Weber
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3776)

Abstract

The configuration of a computational intelligence (CI) method is responsible for its intelligence (e.g. tolerance, flexibility) as well as its accuracy. In this paper, we investigate how to automatically improve the performance of a CI method by finding alternate configuration parameter values that produce more accurate results. We explore this by using a genetic algorithm (GA) to find suitable configurations for the CI methods in an integrated CI system, given several different input data sets. This paper describes the implementation and validation of our approach in the domain of software testing, but ultimately we believe it can be applied in many situations where a CI method must produce accurate results for a wide variety of problems.

References

  1. 1.
    Abraham, A., Nath, B.: Hybrid Heuristics for Optimal Design of Neural Nets. In: John, R., Birkenhead, R. (eds.) Developments in Soft Computing: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Recent Advances in Soft Computing, pp. 15–22. Springer, Berlin (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agarwal, D.: A Comparative Study of Artificial Neural Networks and Info Fuzzy Networks on Their Use in Software Testing. In: Computer Science & Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa FL (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barr, T.: Architectural Overview of the Computational Intelligence Testing Tool. In: Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE International Symposium on High Assurance Systems Engineering, pp. 269–270. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berndt, D., Fisher, J., Johnson, L., Pinglikar, J., Watkins, A.: Breeding Software Test Cases with Genetic Algorithms. In: Sprague Jr., R.A. (ed.) Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2003), IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bezdek, J.C.: Computational Intelligence Defined - by Everyone! In: Kaynak, O., Zadeh, L.A., Türksen, B., Rudas, I.J. (eds.) Computational Intelligence: Soft Computing and Fuzzy-Neuro Integration with Applications, pp. 10–37. Springer, Berlin (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Last, M., Friedman, M., Kandel, A.: The Data Mining Approach to Automated Software Testing. In: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 388–396. ACM Press, New York NY (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pedrycz, W.: Computational Intelligence As an Emerging Paradigm of Software Engineering. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, pp. 7–14. ACM Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saraph, P., Last, M., Kandel, A.: Test Set Generation and Reduction with Artificial Neural Networks. In: Last, M., Kandel, A., Bunke, H. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence Methods in Software Testing, World Scientific, Singapore (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weber, R., Proctor, J.M., Waldstein, I., Kriete, A.: CBR for modeling complex systems. In: Muñoz-Avila, H., Ricci, F. (eds.) ICCBR 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3620, pp. 625–639. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yao, X.: Evolving Artificial Neural Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE 87, 1423–1447 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Roles of Soft Computing and Fuzzy Logic in the Conception, Design and Deployment of Information/Intelligent systems. In: Kaynak, O., Zadeh, L.A., Türksen, B., Rudas, I.J. (eds.) Computational Intelligence: Soft Computing and Fuzzy-Neuro Integration with Applications, pp. 1–9. Springer, Berlin (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason M. Proctor
    • 1
  • Rosina Weber
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Information Science & TechnologyDrexel University 

Personalised recommendations